Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

is there a moldies part three?

1015 replies

Tortington · 03/01/2009 15:31

just wondering, as i can't find it.

OP posts:
notnowplease · 06/01/2009 10:53

ok i can see now how the splinter group occurred daftpunk it may have bee you alone

morningpaper · 06/01/2009 10:55

adds to List Of Symptoms

FairLadyRantALot · 06/01/2009 10:55

you never heard of digging yourself deeper?
Well, I do that all the time....but yeah, would maybe bollockbrain is right and you are using a JCB, so, my services will not be needed

lou031205 · 06/01/2009 10:57

Can I just clear up a detail on the TTR/Mouldies angle, please?

I only started posting about DD in September, as that was when I found out she had SN. I had never heard of TTR until it was brought up on these threads, despite being a member since 2005.

BUT once I saw "TTR" mentioned in relation to SN I thought "What's that?" I DID A MN SEARCH

The URL is posted several times on here, so I went to the site and saw (clearly stated) that it was an invitation only site. It also stated who I could contact. One email later, and I was accepted as a member.

Now frankly, I would rather have seen TTR - SN, and thought, not interested, doesn't apply to me. Unfortunately life isn't quite like that & DD had SALT yesterday, will start epilepsy meds tomorrow, sees Portage on Thursday...

Now, then, does anyone want to persist with a comparison between a group that is exclusive for those that are 'worthy' or 'cool' or 'trusted', which no-one can google, no-one can know about without someone spilling the beans, and a group that is MN searchable, exclusive for those whose lives have been changed forever by being thrust into a world they didn't choose, and easily joined by a simple email?

Didn't think so

daftpunk · 06/01/2009 10:57

ha ha...so i caused 150 to run did i?

FairLadyRantALot · 06/01/2009 10:59

ooops, no idea where that would came from, lol

FairLadyRantALot · 06/01/2009 11:02

finally we got someone to blame....it's all daftpunks fault....not the collective stupidity of the new breed of common mumsnetter....phew...

Remotew · 06/01/2009 11:02

I agree with lou, not a good comparison.

ABudafulSightWereHappyTonight · 06/01/2009 11:02

Does it really matter if Moldies are still reading MN? Or posting?

I really don't have a problem that there is another forum. There were some valid reasons that it was set up in the first place and then re-ignited (for want of a better phrase). I think a non-googleable place is a great idea. I do agree that something seems to have gone awry in the invite/voting system but from what I know of those involved in the Moldies (and no I am not one) it would not have been done maliciously. As someone pointed out about 5 threads ago most of the people involved are not professional forum setter-uppers (again for want of a better phrase!) and I am sure that Moldies was a work in progess to see how best it could work and keep to the ethos of being somewhere safe that people could post.

I understand that some people have been extremely hurt (Custy especially) but this whole MN v. Moldies is not really going to help anyone move on.

I for one am very sad that so many posters that I liked (Kewcumber, LL, Dior, Colditz, MB etc) seem to have gone completely. They all added a great deal to MN.

Remotew · 06/01/2009 11:05

Also agree with Buda. There are lots of names missing now but I can understand why they did it. It's a shame in a way but time to move on I think.

daftpunk · 06/01/2009 11:07

this bloody blame culture...gets everywhere!

FairLadyRantALot · 06/01/2009 11:08
Grin
VinegarTits · 06/01/2009 11:18

Morning

[yawns]

[farts]

Remotew · 06/01/2009 11:21

lucky lazy mare.

VinegarTits · 06/01/2009 11:24

sorry i meant to say

Thomcat · 06/01/2009 11:26

Can I just say - I'm a Moldie and have never ever, not once been asked to vote on whther someone can join or not. I was told about Moldies, didn't ever really feel it was an invite as such. I joined, was happy to see an unclutted site where I could 'see' some Mumsnetters I had formed some sort of friendship with over the years and recognised 98% of the names on there and thought oh how nice so space to talk with some old friends. Never did anyone ask me what I thought about x or y joining or not joining.
Just want to make that clear as some people seem to think that all people who are on Moldies are underhand, sneaky bitches who are all huddled together picking who they consider to be the cream of the cream and that's just not the case.

Tn0g · 06/01/2009 11:29

Not all, TC

That implies that some are...

harleyd · 06/01/2009 11:30

not all

says it all

harleyd · 06/01/2009 11:30

x-post tnog

took me that long to figure out fecking italica

Tortington · 06/01/2009 11:30

Thomcatnpeoples very membership makes them complicit in accepting such behaviour as acceptable, no?

OP posts:
harleyd · 06/01/2009 11:31

italics...grrr

Tn0g · 06/01/2009 11:32

Harold, you thicko

< types furiously with one finger >

VinegarTits · 06/01/2009 11:32

Ok prove it then Thomcat, post a link to the Moldies site?

Bet you wont

Your not allowed to are you?

TWINSETinapeartree · 06/01/2009 11:32

lol at the not all I fear TC may be getting blackballed.

FairLadyRantALot · 06/01/2009 11:33

thomcat...completely off topic...but just looked at your profile and some lovely pics...but wow at your Birthpiccie....

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread