Account deleted?

[FlyingHotChocolatr]

How does Mumsnet decide who is and isn’t a troll?

I set up a new account because I want to stop using this one (too many outing threads that DH may come across), started a new thread this morning, and within an hour my thread was deleted and I have been banned, with no communication. Surely you would see that the IP address is of a well used account, so why ban without communicating? What do you actually investigate? Do you just decide that if there is a new thread by a new user that quickly becomes popular, it must be a troll and they must be removed?

WomanStanleyWoman

I bet the OP is wishing they’d never asked and hoping to be banned again after this thread. 😂

Hee hee.

It would be amusing if OP returned to find this thread has been deleted

And my super shouty woman cat salad meme will be lost forever.

@FlibbertyGiblets

And my super shouty woman cat salad meme will be lost forever.

If it does get deleted I’ll accuse you of being a pretentious head girl on another thread and you can recycle it.

Oh you are so thoughtful Sparklers yes please do that.

We shall laugh our heads off

PS don't forget JUDGEMENTAL

Who made you Head Girl?

What is the problem?

The correct info was given. Three hours before MNHQ came onto the thread.

There’s nothing wrong with being helpful.

@FlibbertyGiblets

PS don't forget JUDGEMENTAL

Oh yes and the jumping in obviously.

So just to clarify, it is wrong for posters to answer questions placed in the Site Stuff board?
Thank you.

If you don’t think it was a problem, fine. We’re all entitled to our own views

So what was your problem with the correct and helpful information?

So just to clarify, it is wrong for posters to answer questions placed in the Site Stuff board?

No.
It appears only one poster had an issue with this.
You gave the correct answer hours before MNHQ did.

@FlibbertyGiblets

So just to clarify, it is wrong for posters to answer questions placed in the Site Stuff board? Thank you.

I vote no it’s not wrong because posters can get their answer more quickly from posters that happen to know the guidelines. However if I was the OP I would probably have emailed MNHQ.

The 11 and a bit hours passing between @FlibbertyGiblets comments and @WomanStanleyWoman crushing put down must be some sort of world record in delayed snark...?

Thank you, I had a minor clammy brow thinking that HQ were secretly irritated by posters' "helpfulness" on here. I bob in, like many do, with tips on how to use our beloved chonky non intuitive talk board.

If a poster only wants an answer directly from MNHQ then they should email directly. If you post on site stuff then you have to accept that there is a chance some fucker is gonna rock up with factually correct information.

@myrtleWilson

The 11 and a bit hours passing between *@FlibbertyGiblets comments and @WomanStanleyWoman* crushing put down must be some sort of world record in delayed snark...?

Even longer - OP 17 Nov, 10am ish; the snarking started tonight, 21 Nov. Long burn. Ooh.