To think members of the feminism chat forum shouldn't be allowed to have threads that contradict their transphobic views removed from the forum?

[DrSue]

Twice now a thread has been started about prominent lesbians opposing transphobia and twice members of the forum have engineered derailing tactics that have resulted in MN taking the thread down.

Wouldn’t this be better in feminism chat, or site stuff?

"engineered derailing tactics"?

Nice try. We prefer "radicalisation portal" though. Has more drama.

Take this to Site Stuff.

How very dare they 🙄

members of the forum have engineered derailing tactics that have resulted in MN taking the thread down.

😂😂😂😂😂

Paranoid much?

If it's the thread I'm thinking of YABU. It's deeply lesbophobic to suggest lesbians accept dick.

Sexual orientation is a protected characteristic.

They dont

Someone reported your thread

MNHQ didnt like it and they removed it

Then you didnt take the hint and had another go and the thread was removed for being a TAAT

MNHQ invited a load of randoms on twitter to complain about any posts they dont like...so its probably them as much as any MN members

I didnt see your first thread

It didnt sound very nice

And site stuff is a good idea

Ill report it for you so it can be moved if MNHQ see fit

This is a second TAAT, and your initial thread was homophobic.

Are you saying that it is transphobic to state that lesbians are exclusively same sex attracted and shouldn't be pressured into having sex with someone who has a penis?

No wonder your homophobic posts were taken down.

Oh and you are calling all the people on the FWR chat transphobic and thats very rude

Of course lesbians don't want to shag a penis. They're lesbians. If they fancied men they'd be straight.

Is that transphobic too now???

Well this surely means that just about everyone on the planet is bisexual

Cept obviously not before someone yells at me

Nah just fwr isn't the place for homophobia

This is confusing? So a lesbian on,y being attracted to women is now somehow wrong? Surely that is homophobia

Goady Threads are always removed.

Plus, you don't want a discussion, you want a propaganda broadcast...

HTH

Is that transphobic too now???

Apparently. 🙄 Isn't everything these days? You can't move without tripping over one or other of the professionally offended.

I don't think members of the forum 'engineered' some of the posts by the OP which (imo) broke standard talk guidelines.

Homophobic. And rapey as fuck.

Male lesbians being attracted to female lesbians is not anything-phobic at all.

In fact it is stunning and brave and every lesbian should automatically want to bed them and their female penises.

However female lesbians being attracted to female lesbians is deeply transphobic, apparently.

So funny.

Try harder, meanwhile back under your bridge.

but strangely no one seems to expect gay men to have sex with transmen. I wonder why that is?

Was it 'their transphobic views' that got the threads removed or your homophobic views, OP?

Me, I suspect it might have been the goady fucker who suggested Prosecco's day is done and it's time for Babycham to make a comeback - MNHQ stepped in to head off the inevitable bunfight and so they bloody well should.