Please or to access all these features

Add post

Watch this thread

Save thread

Start a new thread

Flip thread

Hide thread

My feed

Active Unanswered threads

Getting started FAQ's

Unanswered threads Acronyms Talk guidelines

Hide shortcut buttons

Talk

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

Flip

1 2 3

Original poster

Should there be a watershed on MN??

62 replies

beetroot · 01/09/2006 11:38

No sex, swearing...ERRR....

UNTIL AFTER 9PM?

IMO, this is far to controlling. If I don't want my kids to read something I tell them to go away!

OP posts:

Spagblog · 01/09/2006 13:35

my idea

Holidaymum · 01/09/2006 13:37

Beware Dinosaur or you too shall have channel 5 knocking on your door to tear your family to shreds, just give a bottle and dump out on the streets with mine!

dinosaur · 01/09/2006 15:06

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

expatinscotland · 01/09/2006 15:07

I have to agree w/you there, LGJ, the Judge Flounce flounce thread was one of the best!

MN Hall of Fame, that one.

AvaLou · 01/09/2006 15:19

At least if it echoes it means it's clean...

Californicationfrau · 01/09/2006 17:34

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Blondilocks · 01/09/2006 17:57

I usually have 2 screens up anyway so I flick over if I don't want LO to see anything if she comes in the room (else I just minimise the browser).

southeastastra · 01/09/2006 17:59

it's just some words on the thread titles god i sound like mary whitehouse but my son is 12 and can read from miles away

AvaLou · 01/09/2006 18:33

Very true, I've had to start ignoring emails from some friends until I am well and truly alone after I opened one and scrolled down, with DS playing in the room behind me, to see a very, very nasty picture.
I hope he didn't see.
And why would I want to?
Damn I need new friends...

rustybear · 01/09/2006 19:35

16 y-o DD found me on the bj thread - she was totally grossed out

ocd · 01/09/2006 19:43

i do think thread titile are much more explicit now than they used to be.
peopel were more uraded
i rememrb when i put bloody in a titile adn relaly felt daring.

i htink theres a half way house here
title can be less risque so you cna browse the whoel window wihtout clicking madly

SoupDragon · 01/09/2006 20:13

I don't think there should be any sort of watershed but it would be nice if people were thoughtful enough to censor their thread titles - even a few well placed *s are enough. The one that particularly pissed me off was the one about the 4x4 ad which, unnecessarily, had FUCK in capitals in the title.

Flip

1 2 3