Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Politics

How long do you give Andy Burnham as PM?

213 replies

AndyBurnham2L · 16/07/2026 06:25

Build ‘em up.
Knock ‘em down.

Short honeymoon and then the grumbling will start. It will all be over for him by Christmas.

So, who’s next?

OP posts:
dwordle · 20/07/2026 17:28

Why are some of you so negative, we had years of Tory failed policy, our utilities are ripping us off, our railways are a global joke and people can't bare that we may get a government that's going to set us on a path of change.

Stuff needs to change so young people get a chance of living better lives. If that means sacrifice now then that's what it has to be.

So many people moaning about tax but in reality we don't pay any where near enough. The vast majority of welfare is paid out on pensions and whilst I'll agree there needs to be a work ethos I do not share the idea that we are a nation of welfare spongers.

What do people actually want? If you want railways and utilities like the French and Japanese then unfortunately it means investment. We have tried and tested private investments but it's resulted in poor service and poor investment. Something has to change.

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 17:30

dwordle · 20/07/2026 17:28

Why are some of you so negative, we had years of Tory failed policy, our utilities are ripping us off, our railways are a global joke and people can't bare that we may get a government that's going to set us on a path of change.

Stuff needs to change so young people get a chance of living better lives. If that means sacrifice now then that's what it has to be.

So many people moaning about tax but in reality we don't pay any where near enough. The vast majority of welfare is paid out on pensions and whilst I'll agree there needs to be a work ethos I do not share the idea that we are a nation of welfare spongers.

What do people actually want? If you want railways and utilities like the French and Japanese then unfortunately it means investment. We have tried and tested private investments but it's resulted in poor service and poor investment. Something has to change.

Edited

The tax burden is already high. Even the OECD and IMF have said relying on ever increasing taxes isn’t helping.

SummerPeonies2026 · 20/07/2026 17:35

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 17:30

The tax burden is already high. Even the OECD and IMF have said relying on ever increasing taxes isn’t helping.

An eye watering £3trillion in debt no less

dwordle · 20/07/2026 17:36

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 17:30

The tax burden is already high. Even the OECD and IMF have said relying on ever increasing taxes isn’t helping.

So how do you propose we invest in Railways, healthcare, education and utilities.

I certainly support oil exploration with 70 percent tax on revenues... including the oil fields around the ascension islands.

I support taxes on Amazon and Google at source of 40 percent.

But people still need to pay in. Income tax should follow German and France and we should move to reduce VAT to 10 percent.

dwordle · 20/07/2026 17:37

SummerPeonies2026 · 20/07/2026 17:35

An eye watering £3trillion in debt no less

Have you seen Americas national debt....that's more worrying to be honest because it's completely off the rails.

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 17:40

dwordle · 20/07/2026 17:36

So how do you propose we invest in Railways, healthcare, education and utilities.

I certainly support oil exploration with 70 percent tax on revenues... including the oil fields around the ascension islands.

I support taxes on Amazon and Google at source of 40 percent.

But people still need to pay in. Income tax should follow German and France and we should move to reduce VAT to 10 percent.

Yes good news on oil but it may have to go further than Labour manifesto for oil licences.

VAT maybe, we’re at peak high income PAYE according to OECD. Taxing that demographic more won’t yield what is wanted.

The Google etc I’m not sure what at source means, can you say?

dwordle · 20/07/2026 17:41

Everyone is quick to criticise but this is the situation they have inherited and been inflicted with. Our so called allies across the bond have waged war on our trade networks, they have started wars where no wars were needed starting, forced out hands in defence spending, inflicted punishing levies on our companies

dwordle · 20/07/2026 17:42

EasternStandard · 20/07/2026 17:40

Yes good news on oil but it may have to go further than Labour manifesto for oil licences.

VAT maybe, we’re at peak high income PAYE according to OECD. Taxing that demographic more won’t yield what is wanted.

The Google etc I’m not sure what at source means, can you say?

Edited

Where it's sold at source....not where profits occur

user134913049923 · 20/07/2026 18:32

this is the situation they have inherited and been inflicted with

Yes lifting the two child cap for child benefit to spuff more money up the wall wasn't a new labour policy was it.
Dicking around with immigration for 2 years into government.
Farmers.
Tax.

Burnham blaming Thatcher for problems when that is 36 years ago and postdated by 13 years of a Labour government under Blair/Brown just shows what a fucking joke person he is.

I think we've got him til the next election. It's a car crash.

Justdontwanttodothisnomore · 20/07/2026 18:34

Is he still PM then?.....

BermudaRhombus · 20/07/2026 22:43

dwordle · 20/07/2026 17:28

Why are some of you so negative, we had years of Tory failed policy, our utilities are ripping us off, our railways are a global joke and people can't bare that we may get a government that's going to set us on a path of change.

Stuff needs to change so young people get a chance of living better lives. If that means sacrifice now then that's what it has to be.

So many people moaning about tax but in reality we don't pay any where near enough. The vast majority of welfare is paid out on pensions and whilst I'll agree there needs to be a work ethos I do not share the idea that we are a nation of welfare spongers.

What do people actually want? If you want railways and utilities like the French and Japanese then unfortunately it means investment. We have tried and tested private investments but it's resulted in poor service and poor investment. Something has to change.

Edited

I’m negative because we had a democratically elected PM who won a landslide public vote and was selected by the Labour Party membership as leader. The party was clear on two previous occasions that we did not want Andy Burnham. But rather than having the decency and humility to accept this, Burnham plotted, schemed and undermined Kier Starmer before seizing power in a manner that avoided any form of scrutiny by the party membership or the public. Burnham is a grubby, self-centred, egotistical opportunist who lacks any of the qualities necessary to lead this country. He is vastly out of his depth and will be found out very quickly. I hope that the public realise this and he’s gone by Christmas. At least we’d then have something to celebrate!

ForeverNowWithin · 20/07/2026 22:54

You've got to love a Labour prime minister whose first day on the job sees him promise to end rough sleeping and to help ordinary people with the cost of living crisis while his wife stands there in an £850 dress by Victoria Beckham.

So down with the little people, those Burnhams.

dwordle · 20/07/2026 23:04

user134913049923 · 20/07/2026 18:32

this is the situation they have inherited and been inflicted with

Yes lifting the two child cap for child benefit to spuff more money up the wall wasn't a new labour policy was it.
Dicking around with immigration for 2 years into government.
Farmers.
Tax.

Burnham blaming Thatcher for problems when that is 36 years ago and postdated by 13 years of a Labour government under Blair/Brown just shows what a fucking joke person he is.

I think we've got him til the next election. It's a car crash.

People don't have children to claim more benefits, capping benefits to larger families is cruel and causes huge problems for children growing up in poverty. They simply can't escape it as poverty traps people into endless suffering, poor educational outcomes and poor health...this is the end costs the country a lot more than simply lifting the cap. So I'm afraid politics of finger pointing and judgment has no place in our society.

Farms were taxed because the very wealthy are using land as a tax avoidance investment. This is seeing huge areas of land purchased by hedge funds and billionaires. I'll agree that some farmers have been caught up in the snare but we can't have a situation where huge swathes of land is exchanging hands and no tax is paid

Meadowfinch · 21/07/2026 04:12

dwordle · 20/07/2026 23:04

People don't have children to claim more benefits, capping benefits to larger families is cruel and causes huge problems for children growing up in poverty. They simply can't escape it as poverty traps people into endless suffering, poor educational outcomes and poor health...this is the end costs the country a lot more than simply lifting the cap. So I'm afraid politics of finger pointing and judgment has no place in our society.

Farms were taxed because the very wealthy are using land as a tax avoidance investment. This is seeing huge areas of land purchased by hedge funds and billionaires. I'll agree that some farmers have been caught up in the snare but we can't have a situation where huge swathes of land is exchanging hands and no tax is paid

Don't be naive. People have been having more children to gain benefits since they existed. In 1966, my f tried to persuade my dm to have baby no. 7 so he could "give up work and live off the family allowance". (The pill was available by then and thankfully she refused. )

I know one woman, the ex of a friend of mine who now has four dds by four different dads but she's achieved her objective of a HA house, rather than a flat.

CagneyLacey · 21/07/2026 06:35

Good morning.

Here’s a sobering stat for everyone.

On average, Burnhams new cabinet has 2.5 years experience in ‘real jobs’ as opposed to political appointments, and most of that experience was low grade work.

How the hell can this group claim to represent the working people of this country given their unfamiliarity with what work is?

I hope the pain is short and sharp, so that we can be rid of socialism.

dwordle · 21/07/2026 07:46

Meadowfinch · 21/07/2026 04:12

Don't be naive. People have been having more children to gain benefits since they existed. In 1966, my f tried to persuade my dm to have baby no. 7 so he could "give up work and live off the family allowance". (The pill was available by then and thankfully she refused. )

I know one woman, the ex of a friend of mine who now has four dds by four different dads but she's achieved her objective of a HA house, rather than a flat.

Edited

Typical Daily Mail prop, regardless so we punish the children because of the mothers lifestyle. Or we can drag families out of this cycle and the children don't grow up in endless poverty and all the problems that comes with that...just the impact of the health service should be enough to claw back the money spent.

thefireinyourheart · 21/07/2026 07:54

Well it’s day one and he’s announced a policy that will produce a real terms cut to energy bills for consumers come winter.

I can’t wait for people to spin this one as bad!

Fiendishandfiery · 21/07/2026 07:55

thefireinyourheart · 21/07/2026 07:54

Well it’s day one and he’s announced a policy that will produce a real terms cut to energy bills for consumers come winter.

I can’t wait for people to spin this one as bad!

Has he said how he will pay for it? Increase borrowing, taxes? You understand there is no magic money tree right?

thefireinyourheart · 21/07/2026 07:56

Fiendishandfiery · 21/07/2026 07:55

Has he said how he will pay for it? Increase borrowing, taxes? You understand there is no magic money tree right?

Funded from the digital ID budget for the first year and then funding is to be reviewed after that.

EasternStandard · 21/07/2026 08:27

thefireinyourheart · 21/07/2026 07:56

Funded from the digital ID budget for the first year and then funding is to be reviewed after that.

It’s great digital ID has been binned but Darren Jones confirmed it was unfunded. His tweet:

‘But the DigitalID program was unfunded.

The government will have to set out how it will pay for its new policies at the budget.’

LizzieSiddal · 21/07/2026 08:36

user134913049923 · 20/07/2026 18:32

this is the situation they have inherited and been inflicted with

Yes lifting the two child cap for child benefit to spuff more money up the wall wasn't a new labour policy was it.
Dicking around with immigration for 2 years into government.
Farmers.
Tax.

Burnham blaming Thatcher for problems when that is 36 years ago and postdated by 13 years of a Labour government under Blair/Brown just shows what a fucking joke person he is.

I think we've got him til the next election. It's a car crash.

He didn’t blame only Thatcher. He blamed all governments since Thatcher.

Pacificwave · 21/07/2026 08:53

To be fair, his cabinet picks were sensible. Doing something on energy prices straight away is responsive. On the downside, the VAT is unfunded, so there will be a sting in the tail. The focus on rough sleeping was odd- of course everyone would like to end rough sleeping, but surely there are more pressing concerns for the country as a whole. Was this a distraction technique?

Fiendishandfiery · 21/07/2026 08:57

Pacificwave · 21/07/2026 08:53

To be fair, his cabinet picks were sensible. Doing something on energy prices straight away is responsive. On the downside, the VAT is unfunded, so there will be a sting in the tail. The focus on rough sleeping was odd- of course everyone would like to end rough sleeping, but surely there are more pressing concerns for the country as a whole. Was this a distraction technique?

I don’t object to most of his cabinet either, although I do raynor and milliband. Both as they are fucking inept.

the spending money he doesn’t have is just more labour shite. Tax and spend. We will need to pay for that vat relief , and he thinks the electorate is too fucking stupid to realise.

and the rough sleeping was odd. He made the same promise in Manchester and failed, he knows that’s not about resources, it’s a very complex mental health issue in the main, and is not a promise he can deliver on. So again he seems to have done it for the popularity vote, even though it was a pile of shite. And thinks the public is too stupid to realise.

EasternStandard · 21/07/2026 09:06

Pacificwave · 21/07/2026 08:53

To be fair, his cabinet picks were sensible. Doing something on energy prices straight away is responsive. On the downside, the VAT is unfunded, so there will be a sting in the tail. The focus on rough sleeping was odd- of course everyone would like to end rough sleeping, but surely there are more pressing concerns for the country as a whole. Was this a distraction technique?

This is my take too so far.

CagneyLacey · 21/07/2026 10:27

Pacificwave · 21/07/2026 08:53

To be fair, his cabinet picks were sensible. Doing something on energy prices straight away is responsive. On the downside, the VAT is unfunded, so there will be a sting in the tail. The focus on rough sleeping was odd- of course everyone would like to end rough sleeping, but surely there are more pressing concerns for the country as a whole. Was this a distraction technique?

Well, Labour can simply reallocate the PS VAT revenue to fund it, and reduce the 6,500 state school teachers they had promised.

Cue silence from Labour.

Swipe left for the next trending thread