actually words dont fail me.
dd2 was this weight at a year old. i was told to put her on a diet and i refused. was i being irresponsible? No, i knew dd2 was eating ok, she just put on weight quickly. she was very tall and her height corresponded to her weightm despite the hv dimissing that as not relevent.
dd2 is now 5, very tall and lean. she doesnt have an ounce of fat on her. she stands heads and shoulders above her class mates, has big feet and when she runes, looks like a wild pony with her arms and legs lean and working hard.
obviously crisps, chips and coke arent ideal for a baby, but i hate this article for the way it implys that being big at this very yung age is a bad thing.
oh and the crappy picture i saw related to this article (may not have been on mail site, it was yesterday i read it) had the baby eaing what looks like deep fried chips.
my kids like chips, i use potaoes cut up, boiled for 3 mins, drained until dry, toss them about in the pan for a minute to rough up the edges, spray with one cal oil spray and then oven back. they love them.