Please or to access all these features

News

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Archie Battersbee - Thread 4

1000 replies

BreadInCaptivity · 03/08/2022 00:09

Previous thread:

Archie Battersbee - Thread 3 http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/inthee_news/4601962-archie-battersbee-thread-3

OP posts:
BreadInCaptivity · 03/08/2022 19:05

dapsnotplimsolls · 03/08/2022 19:03

Can she challenge the refusal to move him to a hospice?

Apparently ITV reporting she's going to try to appeal on that basis.

OP posts:
Supersimkin2 · 03/08/2022 19:06

This reply has been deleted

We've removed this post as we don't feel it's in the spirit given the human tragedy being discussed.

Unforgettablefire · 03/08/2022 19:06

OliveTree75 · 03/08/2022 18:28

I am glad I came across this thread. I was becoming increasingly frustrated at comments mainly on FB about this, blaming tiktok and saying he should be given more time. I was beginning to think I was the only one who thinks keeping him on life support is cruel.

I've just had a browse at some of the comments. One man has threatened another saying he'll track him down and snap his neck for "making shit up" all for pointing out and trying to explain Archie is not comatose, but brain dead and won't recover. Some of those posts are hysterical and frantic they all seem convinced he's alive and calling anyone evil who suggests otherwise. Unbelievable.

thoroughlypipinghotbeforeserving · 03/08/2022 19:06

ECHR have been quick

bellac11 · 03/08/2022 19:06

Pruella · 03/08/2022 19:01

She’s not putting him through anything, he’s beyond suffering.

I dont know if Im comfortable with that concept. Does that apply in cases where corpses are found to be abused or violated?

They're already dead so are beyond suffering?

TiddyTidTwo · 03/08/2022 19:08

"ECHR have been quick"

Think that is incredibly telling.

thoroughlypipinghotbeforeserving · 03/08/2022 19:09

They were ready for it

bellac11 · 03/08/2022 19:09

BreadInCaptivity · 03/08/2022 19:05

Apparently ITV reporting she's going to try to appeal on that basis.

Wasnt one of her earlier appeals about the hospitals wish to do an MRI and she opposed him being moved

I dont think she can now say he is ok to be moved having used that argument to prevent him being moved to have a scan

Quia · 03/08/2022 19:10

BreadInCaptivity · 03/08/2022 18:53

I think this is the end of the road now.

The request to move to a hospice has been denied already (ergo would be a move abroad).

I'm not aware of any other legal challenges to be made and I hope the family do not go down the route of protests or trying to physically prevent withdrawal of treatment.

The request hasn't been denied by the courts, so that may well be the next application.

I know it would be very hard to do, but maybe the time has come for the courts to say there can be no more delays, and therefore that no application for that purpose will be considered for anything short of a miraculous recovery.

itsgettingweird · 03/08/2022 19:10

Arsewangry · 03/08/2022 18:53

I personally find some of the comments on this thread to be quite unkind to a woman in the process of losing her child. If it were me, I have a boy the same age, and I would have to go down every avenue to fight on his behalf just so "what if?" thoughts didn't haunt me for the rest of my life.

She's probably already feeling an enormous amount of guilt that he's in this situation - not that it's her fault at all - on top of the denial. It's all she can do now for him to fight his corner for any tiny chance 'just in case', because once it's done it's done, and can't be undone.

It's really sad that a child in Archie's situation is thought of as a "bed-blocker" wasting NHS resources.

I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy what that family are going through.

What do you think fighting for him to remain in life support can do?

You have read the medical notes publicly available - yes?

His brain is necrosising and dripping into his spine.

Every part of his existence is artificial except his heartbeat.

He cannot improve. The only reason he cannot be legally declared dead is because when they wanted to test his brain stem etc his mum refused the tests.

TiddyTidTwo · 03/08/2022 19:11

Sorry if already posted:

Archie Battersbee - Thread 4
bellac11 · 03/08/2022 19:13

Quia · 03/08/2022 19:10

The request hasn't been denied by the courts, so that may well be the next application.

I know it would be very hard to do, but maybe the time has come for the courts to say there can be no more delays, and therefore that no application for that purpose will be considered for anything short of a miraculous recovery.

Wouldnt she need to show that a hospice space is available and willing to take him. What would a hospice do?

BreadInCaptivity · 03/08/2022 19:14

The request hasn't been denied by the courts, so that may well be the next application.

But isn't the fact that the court have already said continued treatment is not in his best interests result in a hospice move (that would take time to plan if it were possible) effectively cutting off this tactic.

I'd also go back to a pp where I noted that on the 25th May the reason the family refused an MRI was because it could harm him.

OP posts:
Quia · 03/08/2022 19:18

I personally find some of the comments on this thread to be quite unkind to a woman in the process of losing her child. If it were me, I have a boy the same age, and I would have to go down every avenue to fight on his behalf just so "what if?" thoughts didn't haunt me for the rest of my life.

I don't think you would, if you were faced with the reality. Ultimately most parents put their children first every time, no matter how much it hurts them as parents.

LilyMumsnet · 03/08/2022 19:18

Hi all

This is a desperately sad case and an incredibly difficult position for a mother to be in. We are, at our very core, a parenting site that provides support.

We have already removed a large amount of posts that are not in the spirit of the site. We will remove this thread if we continue having to delete posts - so please bear this in mind going forward.

Eeksteek · 03/08/2022 19:20

thereisonlyoneofme · 03/08/2022 18:24

I dont understand what she hopes will be achieved. Does she just want his physical body there to visit as there is no hope of him ever having any sort of life or does she truly believe that all the doctors are wrong

Only speculation, but I honestly think she just can’t bear to go home. Getting home and finding him like that must have been horrific. I wouldn’t ever want go there again.

TheLassWiADelicateAir · 03/08/2022 19:21

bellac11 · 03/08/2022 19:06

I dont know if Im comfortable with that concept. Does that apply in cases where corpses are found to be abused or violated?

They're already dead so are beyond suffering?

The dead are entitled to be treated with dignity- morally, ethically and legally.

TiddyTidTwo · 03/08/2022 19:22

Understood Lily. I do think this has been one of the most sensible discussions out there and would be a shame to lose it as many have shared our own stories and for me, has helped as I was starting to question my own decision with my father, but soon got back on track by coming here.

I'm hoping now the ECHR has dismissed the action, this little chap can now peacefully move on.

Mennex · 03/08/2022 19:22

Yes it will be terrible being at home but, as a point of fact, she was in the house (her bedroom) when it happenned according to her own statements.

Quia · 03/08/2022 19:23

bellac11 · 03/08/2022 19:13

Wouldnt she need to show that a hospice space is available and willing to take him. What would a hospice do?

Presumably, yes. Also that it is safe to move him, which may be difficult given that previously she opposed him being taken even for an MRI scan because of the danger involved.

I'm sure that if he could be moved to a hospice the hospital would be delighted to allow it. It would make all sorts of sense given that this is the sort of situation they are set up for, and it would presumably remove all the stresses and hostility around the relationship with the hospital. But I don't see how it can be done.

The other possibility, of course, is the move to Turkey/Japan or wherever. I do hope however that her lawyers won't even try that without even halfway credible supporting evidence, which we've heard nothing about so far.

itsgettingweird · 03/08/2022 19:23

Having sat with my mum in a hospice when it was clear she was rotting I can honestly say i don't think many people would insist in keeping someone in Archie's condition alive artificially.

Until you've seen this you really dont understand. It's horrific and I found myself wanting death to take her in the end.

The fact they have his room so cold with AC shows the state of his body. He's effectively been in 'cold room' conditions for weeks now.

(You can Google cold rooms or I linked before to the together for shirt lives leaflet)

TheCountessOfGrantham · 03/08/2022 19:23

Just popped back to say I haven't read all of the previous threads but Hollie does have form for using the media to force a preferred outcome . There's a story about Archie getting very sore eyes from eye drops when he was four and the pharmacy apologising but the mum still taking it to the press, presumably for attention drawn to it and/or compensation.

www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2774629/Boy-four-suffers-agonising-burns-Boots-pharmacy-gave-ear-drops-eye-infection.html

So perhaps she's very easily manipulated into whatever her Facebook group/army want her to do AND is the sort of person who thinks media attention will get her what she wants.

bellac11 · 03/08/2022 19:25

TheLassWiADelicateAir · 03/08/2022 19:21

The dead are entitled to be treated with dignity- morally, ethically and legally.

Absolutely, Im astounded at that posters suggestion that because he's dead it doesnt matter what happens to him

Soubriquet · 03/08/2022 19:25

That article was written in 2014 so not relevant and tbh I would have kicked up a fuss too if my child had sore eyes from a prescription gone wrong

OpinionsUnseen · 03/08/2022 19:25

In order to have him moved to a hospice she would have to have a hospice bed available to him. No hospice is going to agree to take him in this instance.

The courts aren’t going to allow an appeal to have him moved based on the fact there is nowhere to move him to.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread