we are itn THE TIMES...AGAIN RE SHREK

[FluffyMummy123]

Message withdrawn

Message withdrawn

wonder who the times reporter spy is then??

Message withdrawn

have just posted on mccann thread.
we need some of pur opinions on there as all the views are for the ad and saying we are selfish

morning cod..the power of mnet strikes again

lucyjones
who said that and is that what you think??
I'm confused

no that is not what I think
the comments at the bottom of the article all are saying that the ad is a good idea and we, the coplainers, are selfish

should say complainers

Message withdrawn

Message withdrawn

Message withdrawn

you know cod, your never gonna get quoted in a paper with your typing

maybe that why you do it

Message withdrawn

Message withdrawn

i thought mn had copyrght over all mn content including posts?

I've emailed.

So, is MN truly the barometer of all parenting opinions, or are journos just getting v.v. lazy?

(Oh, just if it ever does appear I'm "Janet" from Bournemouth... my rl name is a tad too distinctive for getting arsey on news sites)

I have e-mailed.

Was going to post on the Times blog, but all the spelling mistakes on the previous posts just made me want to vent, which wasn't quite the objective!!

'Please note that Mumsnet has copyright in all submissions to the chat board, and reserves the right to edit and re-publish these in print form.'

so mn must know who the journo is ?

I'm frequently surprised by the comments below stories in The Times, which I thought was aimed at intelligent people. It's as though they have a group of thick people on standby ready to post inane comments

aimed at a certain class - doesn't mean intelligent