Surely it's not contempt of court to talk about what is already out in public? Otherwise the papers wouldn't have been able to publish the article linked to in the OP?
Talking about stuff not published I can understand. But stuff that is?
Pag Absolutely. With the whole Saville thing there were a lot of comments about how he "looked the type", which is ridiculous. And why so many get away with it.
Though in this case my shock is less to do with how this guy looks, or who he is, more the thought that anyone could even think about doing anything like that to a 1 year old. It's just totally beyond my comprehension.