A pretender for the Burchill crown?

[monkeytrousers]

nice of her to put so much effort into it..

[Tortington]

she doesnt tar all sahms with the same brush - she used "posh spice" as her marker

she put a sentance in about historical context. she is clearly taking about a certain type of person with money.

and i dont despise anyone for having it

there is no lumping everyone in the same boat here - its clearly a trishaesq attack on poncey rich people

[Tortington]

i enjoyed this debate

can we have another one?

[monkeytrousers]

Oh, you say you enjoyed it but where is the evidence to back you up. Eh??

[Tortington]

i have the pants to prove it

[monkeytrousers]

Oh-er!

[emkana]

Just as an inside - what is going in the journalistic world when this article here appears in the Guardian, whereas the far more reasonable one from the other thread appeared in the Daily Mail?

[Tortington]

depends on where you stand on the other one - is that the newstatesman one emkana?

you see i felt much like many of you do about this one - i felt that that article failed by omission

[monkeytrousers]

There's a few letters about this in todays mag. Is anyone owning up?

[Tortington]

not me i dont buy papers. and am to lazy to be bothered!

[Caligula]

Link please!!!!

[monkeytrousers]

here

[Tortington]

ha ha haaah haah ah haaa haa "Carol Sarler's article showed all the insight of a Daily Mail exposé on social workers. "

ha haaa haa haaa ha thats soooo funny! like it

[Caligula]

Mine didn't get printed. Love 'em all though!

Interesting that not one agreed with her. I guess that must mirror the proportion of opinions received?