A pretender for the Burchill crown?

[monkeytrousers]

nice of her to put so much effort into it..

she doesnt tar all sahms with the same brush - she used "posh spice" as her marker

she put a sentance in about historical context. she is clearly taking about a certain type of person with money.

and i dont despise anyone for having it

there is no lumping everyone in the same boat here - its clearly a trishaesq attack on poncey rich people

i enjoyed this debate

can we have another one?

Oh, you say you enjoyed it but where is the evidence to back you up. Eh??

i have the pants to prove it

Oh-er!

Just as an inside - what is going in the journalistic world when this article here appears in the Guardian, whereas the far more reasonable one from the other thread appeared in the Daily Mail?

depends on where you stand on the other one - is that the newstatesman one emkana?

you see i felt much like many of you do about this one - i felt that that article failed by omission

There's a few letters about this in todays mag. Is anyone owning up?

not me i dont buy papers. and am to lazy to be bothered!

Link please!!!!

here

ha ha haaah haah ah haaa haa "Carol Sarler's article showed all the insight of a Daily Mail exposé on social workers. "

ha haaa haa haaa ha thats soooo funny! like it

Mine didn't get printed. Love 'em all though!

Interesting that not one agreed with her. I guess that must mirror the proportion of opinions received?