Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be agreeing with new conservative benefits proposal re alcohol etc

799 replies

Tigerthebreadroll · Today 07:26

They will cut benefits for people that haven't paid into the system and been unemployed for over 6 months (don't quote me on that number ) by 30 % and it will be given on a prepaid type card. Meaning it won't be accepted by betting shops, for alcohol or cigarettes. I feel that's right . Why should tax payers money be spent on funding cigarettes etc but I have no problem with funding the basics like food etc.
Thoughts?
Basically you will claim full benefits if you've worked and paid into the system. Should reduce generational unemployment hopefully

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Binnyforthewin · Today 13:18

TheFishFish · Today 13:16

Yes, it is, in exactly the same way that your wages are your own money.

Nope. Benefits are not wages. If you can't see the difference it might explain why the left are screwing up the country. Benefits are allocation of state money. If the state chooses to allocate that in vouchers rather than cash that is fine.

Ireallycantthinkofagoodone · Today 13:20

TheFishFish · Today 13:14

It's a terrible idea.

Fundamentally all restrictions like this do is remove choice.

So, your pre-paid card that you can only spend on food. What happens if your car breaks down, and the only spare money you have is "for food"?

What happens if you lose your job as a result of that?

Edited

It doesn’t apply to working people.

Periperi2025 · Today 13:20

Pumpkindice · Today 13:08

A family member of mine is one of the people the supporters of this would be targeting. Long term unemployed, long history of petty crime, alcoholic, smoker.
If he actually went without alcohol, he'd be dead pretty quickly, which I'm sure some would be happy about. The reality is if he were given a cashless system he'd just sell the card, same as how he shoplifts to fund his habits already. It's a forty year addiction, he isn't going to change his ways because of a government policy. Even if he tried to get sober the chances of it working are miniscule. He has been though all the programmes offered through NHS/probation in the past, none stuck and I can't see any reason that further public money should be spent on those for him, they're extremely expensive.
Sure someone could try and send him to work, but he'd be useless. How would you do health and safety with someone who needs to drink daily to avoid having a seizure? What use would he be as a litter picker when he has neuropathy from long term alcohol abuse?
Yes its a pain he's taking money in benefits, but the reality is he won't make it to 60, so he's never going to get a pension. He won't cost the public purse for that much longer.

The other part that people tend to ignore is how individuals end up in this situation. He's no angel, of course, and maybe could have tried a different route. But he came from s background of bereavement, neglect and abuse, with these patterns starting pre teen. Perhaps if there had been more intervention then things would be different, but trying a scheme like this 40 years later wouldn't work, it would just make some voters feel smug and superior.

Prehaps if he hadn't had an alcoholic lifestyle funded via benefits when he was younger he would be doing better now, who knows.

The current system isn't sutainable and isn't working, it may be too late for systems changes to improve his outlook, but that doesn't mean things shouldn't change.

TheFishFish · Today 13:21

Binnyforthewin · Today 13:18

Nope. Benefits are not wages. If you can't see the difference it might explain why the left are screwing up the country. Benefits are allocation of state money. If the state chooses to allocate that in vouchers rather than cash that is fine.

No, it's really not fine. Even if you don't think it's morally reprehensible to restrict what people do with the money - which it is - practically it doesn't work and when it's been tried before it's been shown to not work.

The people who you think you are punishing will find a way to access the products you don't want them to buy regardless, and plenty people will be caught in the crossfire - see my point about food stamps above, for example.

OneFastPinkTraybake · Today 13:21

Binnyforthewin · Today 13:18

Nope. Benefits are not wages. If you can't see the difference it might explain why the left are screwing up the country. Benefits are allocation of state money. If the state chooses to allocate that in vouchers rather than cash that is fine.

How are the left screwing up the country. They've just made cuts to disability benefits. That will no doubt please some people. Vouchers will be completely unworkable

Allisnotlost1 · Today 13:22

Overthebow · Today 13:10

Why? All the funded childcare hours are a set paid amount to the childcare setting, it doesn’t cost the government more to pay to a private setting then a state one. It would cost them more in setting up of more nurseries though if this was mandated.

Why should people getting free hours have a choice about where to put their children? If they want to go somewhere else, let them pay.

You’re right though, administration costs are always higher when we divide the population into deserving and undeserving, rather than treating them equally as citizens and service users.

Periperi2025 · Today 13:23

TheFishFish · Today 13:14

It's a terrible idea.

Fundamentally all restrictions like this do is remove choice.

So, your pre-paid card that you can only spend on food. What happens if your car breaks down, and the only spare money you have is "for food"?

What happens if you lose your job as a result of that?

Edited

How would a card that is restricted from using for the purchase of alcohol or ciggerates stop you spending on fixing your car? Unless you're fuelling your care on vodka then the two things are unrelated.

Greenhippos · Today 13:23

People will buy items with the card and sell them cheap to get cash for cigarettes and booze. Which they will then buy on the black market.

Edited to add - kids at my secondary school would use their pre paid lunch cards (free school meals) to buy a lunch - his mate/associate would then pay 50p for a £1.00 lunch and the free school meals kid would buy chips or cigarettes in town.

Icedvanillacoffee · Today 13:23

@DuncinToffee
No argument here. I'm afraid Im a bit of an old trot I think public transport should be free for many more groups in our country. I have a freedom pass and its awesome.
Weirdly I was using it to travel home from the best paid job I ever had until I retired.

TheFishFish · Today 13:23

OneFastPinkTraybake · Today 13:21

How are the left screwing up the country. They've just made cuts to disability benefits. That will no doubt please some people. Vouchers will be completely unworkable

It's fucking hilarious that problems that are a direct result of decisions made by right-wing parties have now become the left screwing the country.

Brexit and austerity have led us directly to the "state" of the UK, and whose ideas were they, again?

PinkFruitbat · Today 13:24

Refreshing to see people have finally had enough of the endless money poured into welfare.

Allisnotlost1 · Today 13:24

Periperi2025 · Today 13:23

How would a card that is restricted from using for the purchase of alcohol or ciggerates stop you spending on fixing your car? Unless you're fuelling your care on vodka then the two things are unrelated.

How would a pre-paid card stop someone buying alcohol or cigarettes in a supermarket?

AliceMcK · Today 13:25

namechangeforthisonelol · Today 07:39

Smoking and drinking is only for the working rich people of society?

Yes! And I say that as a parent on benefits and the child of parents who always had money for fags and booze but not to provide essentials for myself and my sibling's.

Periperi2025 · Today 13:25

Allisnotlost1 · Today 13:24

How would a pre-paid card stop someone buying alcohol or cigarettes in a supermarket?

Same as a rooster card for a kid, by automatically stopping transactions of merchandise limited to sale to 18+ only.

TheFishFish · Today 13:25

Periperi2025 · Today 13:23

How would a card that is restricted from using for the purchase of alcohol or ciggerates stop you spending on fixing your car? Unless you're fuelling your care on vodka then the two things are unrelated.

It's not hard to understand.

If, as was suggested by the poster, that child benefit can only be spent on food, what does someone on the breadline do if they can't access that money for a car repair, for example.

You have £200 on a food card. You need £100 for car repairs or you lose your job. Bit of an issue, don't you think?

You have the money, it's just some idiot has decreed that you can only spend it in Asda.

If you want to say well, we only restrict it for alcohol, what do you think happens? Addicts just go "oh sure, that's fine" or they do they perhaps go "shit, i now need to trade off £40 of my benefit card for £20 of booze" on the black market?

Such schemes do. not. work because desperate people will always find a way around them.

OriginalUsername2 · Today 13:26

TheFishFish · Today 13:23

It's fucking hilarious that problems that are a direct result of decisions made by right-wing parties have now become the left screwing the country.

Brexit and austerity have led us directly to the "state" of the UK, and whose ideas were they, again?

This. The stupidity is astounding.

Allisnotlost1 · Today 13:26

dustabsorber · Today 13:00

No, I stopped in 1997. Just after Diana's death. I won't take it up again as I would like to live as long as my parents did and garner 28 years state pension.

But obviously you won’t spend any of it on sherry, lottery tickets or high fat foods.

AliceMcK · Today 13:27

Allisnotlost1 · Today 13:24

How would a pre-paid card stop someone buying alcohol or cigarettes in a supermarket?

I presume the same way the food vouchers worked, if alcohol or cigarettes are in the shop then the vouchers wouldn’t be accepted when scanning them.

Allisnotlost1 · Today 13:27

Periperi2025 · Today 13:25

Same as a rooster card for a kid, by automatically stopping transactions of merchandise limited to sale to 18+ only.

And who operates that system?

aCatCalledFawkes · Today 13:29

AliceMcK · Today 13:25

Yes! And I say that as a parent on benefits and the child of parents who always had money for fags and booze but not to provide essentials for myself and my sibling's.

You do know though that was your parents, and not all parents even the ones on benefits that treat their kids like this? Lots of them also might go without in the week but try to budget for something nice at the weekend like a bottle of wine which doesn't mean getting shitfaced or smoking endless packs of fags.

GasPanic · Today 13:29

XenoBitch · Today 13:12

Whoever comes up with this shite seems to have no clue what amounts people on UC get, or how bad the job market is right now.

The Tories appear to believe Burnham is going to go for an election in November.

So they are starting to put some clear policy ideas out there to help people understand what they stand for ahead of that. Some of that will be real policy that affects the country and the finances. And some of it will just be ideological fluff like this, just designed to appeal to their voter base, or more importantly, the voter base they want to steal or shore up from Reform.

They will talk a good game on stuff like this but in all probability they won't actually do anything about it, because as you point out, it probably won't work or make any significant difference.

LakieLady · Today 13:29

2dogsandabudgie · Today 11:51

How strange that on a thread about cutting benefits for people who are long term unemployed, there's cries of 'but there's a shortage of jobs'. Yet on a thread about migrant crossings yesterday there were cries of 'but we need these people to do the low skilled jobs'.

Yes, different posters have different opinions; it's truly remarkable.

TonyDancer · Today 13:29

GasPanic · Today 13:29

The Tories appear to believe Burnham is going to go for an election in November.

So they are starting to put some clear policy ideas out there to help people understand what they stand for ahead of that. Some of that will be real policy that affects the country and the finances. And some of it will just be ideological fluff like this, just designed to appeal to their voter base, or more importantly, the voter base they want to steal or shore up from Reform.

They will talk a good game on stuff like this but in all probability they won't actually do anything about it, because as you point out, it probably won't work or make any significant difference.

Quite

Allisnotlost1 · Today 13:30

AliceMcK · Today 13:27

I presume the same way the food vouchers worked, if alcohol or cigarettes are in the shop then the vouchers wouldn’t be accepted when scanning them.

Which depends on shop staff managing the system and process, and likely means only some shops would accept them
at all.

Another poster has suggested the Rooster card, which is owned by (I think) NatWest. Who I’m sure will be thrilled to give the model away to government for free.

TigerRag · Today 13:30

Binnyforthewin · Today 13:18

Nope. Benefits are not wages. If you can't see the difference it might explain why the left are screwing up the country. Benefits are allocation of state money. If the state chooses to allocate that in vouchers rather than cash that is fine.

And if your local shop doesn't accept vouchers for food shopping then what?

Swipe left for the next trending thread