Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be agreeing with new conservative benefits proposal re alcohol etc

993 replies

Tigerthebreadroll · Today 07:26

They will cut benefits for people that haven't paid into the system and been unemployed for over 6 months (don't quote me on that number ) by 30 % and it will be given on a prepaid type card. Meaning it won't be accepted by betting shops, for alcohol or cigarettes. I feel that's right . Why should tax payers money be spent on funding cigarettes etc but I have no problem with funding the basics like food etc.
Thoughts?
Basically you will claim full benefits if you've worked and paid into the system. Should reduce generational unemployment hopefully

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
OneFastPinkTraybake · Today 09:35

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I've never done cash in hand jobs any time I've been on benefits and I'm not scum. I'm actually disabled.

I live in a council flat that was built in 1934. Not fancy. I don't drive either.

If you remove benefits from people -you make them homeless costing the taxpayer more.

ladylioness · Today 09:37

Tigerthebreadroll · Today 07:26

They will cut benefits for people that haven't paid into the system and been unemployed for over 6 months (don't quote me on that number ) by 30 % and it will be given on a prepaid type card. Meaning it won't be accepted by betting shops, for alcohol or cigarettes. I feel that's right . Why should tax payers money be spent on funding cigarettes etc but I have no problem with funding the basics like food etc.
Thoughts?
Basically you will claim full benefits if you've worked and paid into the system. Should reduce generational unemployment hopefully

Basically stolen from Reform.

mothra · Today 09:37

They tried this in parts of Australia. The prepaid cards are linked to big businesses only. This means you can no longer access second hand school/uni books and uniforms, charity shops, and food markets (I live close to a big undercover food market and the fruit, veg and meat is cheaper than the supermarkets). No FB marketplace or the like. It's problematic.

gamerchick · Today 09:38

drspouse · Today 07:47

People will just sell on their prepaid cards at a discount to get cash. Especially if they have an addiction.

That's exactly what would happen.

RubyWooVixen · Today 09:38

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Are disabled people scum? Are people who lose their jobs "scum"? Are people who work for a low wage "scum"?

justasking111 · Today 09:38

BigButtons · Today 07:29

There is a family at the school where I work- we have to feed their kid breakfast because they say they do not have enough money. Both parents stand at the school gates puffing away. They do not work.

On their shiny new phones at our local school 🙄

MyLifeHasChanged · Today 09:39

GingerdeadMan · Today 09:09

This is what worries me.

Im not sure people like us have been accounted for or whether we will just go in the 'malingering' pile and not be eligible for anything, despite our unpaid labour saving the state thousands.

Yep, we and those that we care for will be punished

OneFastPinkTraybake · Today 09:39

justasking111 · Today 09:38

On their shiny new phones at our local school 🙄

More stereotypes. I have a 70 pounds SIM free Motorola phone.

RubyWooVixen · Today 09:39

ladylioness · Today 09:37

Basically stolen from Reform.

Yes. Badenoch is out of ideas and is stealing from Reform.

Bobbieiris · Today 09:40

But it's so hard to find a job these days, it takes much longer than 6 months to find work. My sister in law spent over a year looking for a new job. And also what if you have been miserable job searching for months and just want a little drink to cheer yourself up? What's wrong with that? People can spend what they want with their money and people having to claim benefits are hardly rolling in money.

RubyWooVixen · Today 09:40

justasking111 · Today 09:38

On their shiny new phones at our local school 🙄

How do you know they are on benefits?

Purpleelephantsandunicorns · Today 09:41

I think that philosophical ideas aside it is entirely unworkable. It would cost far more to set up such a system than could possibly be saved.

The impact in the rural poor will also be massive as a lot of small village shops won't pay to set up this kind of payment causing more problems.

MyLifeHasChanged · Today 09:41

justasking111 · Today 09:38

On their shiny new phones at our local school 🙄

My phone has sellotape around it! - and I dont work because im run off my feet with care duties. So it isnt 'all' benefit claimants.

LittleGreenShoots · Today 09:41

millymollymoomoo · Today 07:27

ynbu but lefties on here will hate it and scream human rights and tax the rich ( defined as anyone working )

Oh grow up. This is not a radical thing to suggest to people on either side of the political spectrum. Why not just have a conversation without accusing anyone of screaming?

Plenty of us on the left are very much in favour of the benefits system being re-evaluated. Why do you assume those getting the benefits are on the left? One look at Farage's supporters would suggest a lot of them are very much right wing these days.

My husband was studying and then had a 15 month work contract which he completed with thanks from his employer, followed by a period of several months unemployment while he was looking for further work. It was very frustrating to be told he was ineligible for any benefits to live on while he searched because the contract hadn't been for two years or more. I don't know how people are managing to claim unemployment for so long because it's been of no use to us.

Tigerthebreadroll · Today 09:41

AStonedRose · Today 07:35

I fucking hope you never find yourself unable to find work, OP.

Why so cross? I haven't been unemployed in 25 years. Paid enough in taxes to get benefits for years to come. And I'd expect to get them if I cannot find work. If you have worked before you will be fine ? Disability is not included in the proposal and shouldn't be

OP posts:
Bobbieiris · Today 09:41

Oh and also, I have had to claim benefits in the past when I lost my job. It was awful. Why make things even more miserable for people?

Thezookeepersneice · Today 09:42

RubyWooVixen · Today 09:39

Yes. Badenoch is out of ideas and is stealing from Reform.

I agree, and I find it genuinely disappointing - I thought she had more about her.

Politically, I think this is a gift to the Lib Dems.

OneFastPinkTraybake · Today 09:42

Tigerthebreadroll · Today 07:26

They will cut benefits for people that haven't paid into the system and been unemployed for over 6 months (don't quote me on that number ) by 30 % and it will be given on a prepaid type card. Meaning it won't be accepted by betting shops, for alcohol or cigarettes. I feel that's right . Why should tax payers money be spent on funding cigarettes etc but I have no problem with funding the basics like food etc.
Thoughts?
Basically you will claim full benefits if you've worked and paid into the system. Should reduce generational unemployment hopefully

Oh yeah because that's all people out of work do. Sit sipping Chardonnay (a single person over 25 on UC gets 434 a month). Puffing on Benson and Hedges and putting bets on.

I mean fuck paying my gas bill. Paddy power is where it's at.

Dontcallmescarface · Today 09:42

Blinkett · Today 09:08

So pay it to the parent, not the child.

So the parent has control of a 25 year old's money? Have a little think about how badly that could go wrong.

EasternStandard · Today 09:43

Thezookeepersneice · Today 09:42

I agree, and I find it genuinely disappointing - I thought she had more about her.

Politically, I think this is a gift to the Lib Dems.

Not sure, the op has majority yanbu.

User454545454546565 · Today 09:43

CandyCrushLevel14809 · Today 09:35

Nice.
There are not enough jobs to go around at the moment.
No amount of humiliating community service will change that.
You think all the long-term unemployed are scroungers?

Read my post properly instead of kicking off?

I said the 6-month thing isn't fair - precisely because there aren't enough jobs, obviously - and that jobs need protecting against AI. I'm a medium term claimant myself - because the job market is horrendous.

Tigerthebreadroll · Today 09:43

ThisOliveKoala · Today 07:45

They had 14 years in power during which the benefits bill rose to its highest, so in 14 years they couldn’t do any of these things?

However labour who just came back in are at fault?

It’s worrying that in 14 years they weren’t able to do much, however now they have the talking points.

Totally agree... I think its obviously to win votes but regardless of which party supports this i feel its a sensible next step to pilot

OP posts:
nofacenonamenonumber · Today 09:44

Why do you believe anything that a politician tells you ?

Dweetfidilove · Today 09:45

Thezookeepersneice · Today 09:14

Exactly this. Even if you take any moral or compassionate arguments out of it, it’s bad policy making. I imagine that’s why they never tried it during their fourteen years in power, but even so I find it genuinely disappointing to see Kemi Badenoch resorting to this kind of performative, ideological nonsense.

I am not a great fan of hers, but recognise her as an intellectual and capable woman; which I hoped would translate to a very robust opposition leader. She has her moments, but on days like today I just shake my head with disappointment.

Tigerthebreadroll · Today 09:45

I do think the posters that said 6 months isn't enough have a point- no idea what the right amount of time is myself but I am sure they will have to figure out a fair system

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread