Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Andy Burnham should put the damn social care tax on landlords and big occupational pensions

307 replies

CurdinHenry · Yesterday 13:30

Why is it always workers who pay

OP posts:
LBFseBrom · Yesterday 17:24

Presumably landlords do pay income tax, so do pensioners of which I am one. I believe in social care and am happy for my tax to contribute to it, I may need some help one day.

BiteSizedLife · Yesterday 17:24

the80sweregreat · Yesterday 17:21

People setting up trust funds. It’s a solution , but again only if you can afford the fees to do it and the council doesn’t get wind of people doing it to avoid care home fees. I’m not sure how it works though.
I bet politicians all do it for their offspring.

I looked into doing this.

But you "lose" the money (or asset) the day you put it into the trust fund. From that day onwards that money is no longer yours. Meaning you make yourself penniless on the blind hope you wont ever need the money.

Trust funds - for people with more money than they will ever need.

magnomam · Yesterday 17:25

Trusts are for those who can afford them. For people asset rich & cash poor not so much

Digerydont · Yesterday 17:27

Viviennemary · Yesterday 17:01

I agree. Everybody needs to contribute according to their means.

To me that includes people who don't work, but could, working. Make people do something in exchange for their benefits, and a lot of resentment towards UC claimants would vanish.

TheFrendo · Yesterday 17:29

Since Labour came to power in 2024, 450,000 millionaires have left the UK. These people were paying a lot of tax, both in absolute terms and proportionately.

With them gone, everybody else will have to pay more tax.

This will only get worse. The national debt is £3T, the interest is ~£150b a year and we are borrowing that too.

Fecked.

Dishwashersforever · Yesterday 17:33

Happyjoe · Yesterday 16:44

Not to be a total dick but why does someone who inherits have to pay and someone in social housing with no property to leave have little to pay?

There needs to be a fair system.

What I would like is the care homes to be council run, instead of most of them charing so so much money and it just going to huge investment companies overseas. As soon as these investment companies take over things the prices go so high, like at the vets for example.

Edited

Oh I totally agree that carehomes should be government run or at least not for profit. I think inheritance tax would be on everything, not just houses etc, but savings and anything else. You obviously can’t tax people on something they don’t have though …I’d rather leave a house to my kids and pay inheritance tax than not have a house to leave at all.

sweatybettytoday · Yesterday 17:34

Landlords are selling up due the the new renters rights. Tax them more and they’ll be hardly any left so rents will increase with demand?

magnomam · Yesterday 17:35

@TheFrendoWhat?

450k millionaires left the UK in the last 2 years?!

You need to check your figures! 😆😆

Digerydont · Yesterday 17:36

magnomam · Yesterday 17:35

@TheFrendoWhat?

450k millionaires left the UK in the last 2 years?!

You need to check your figures! 😆😆

AB wants 10 years. Who will be left to soak by then?

magnomam · Yesterday 17:37

@Digerydontnot sure why you have quoted me?

AzureStaffy · Yesterday 17:40

Jenkibuble · Yesterday 17:21

This needs to be done carefully or it can be clawed back - deprivation of assets !

7 years I believe!

No, there's no time limit on Deprivation of Assets. The 7 years refers to inheritance tax. Local councils will go over everything to see if a person has the means to pay towards their care and can claw money back if there's been an attempt to dispose of assets or cash.

PussyGaylore · Yesterday 17:47

Are you working for the governments nudge unit OP?

Dalesway · Yesterday 17:47

CurdinHenry · Yesterday 13:30

Why is it always workers who pay

You do realise it's workers who have occupational pensions, usually having contributed heavily during their working lives?

How much do you contribute to your pension currently?

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 17:47

Tax is absolutely fine when it's then spent on us

I agree, @happyjoe, but all too often the very services and people who need it are the last to actually see any of the money

There's a touching faith that the state, if handed even more money, could solve everything for us, but I'm afraid it's not a faith I share - at least not with the way things are currently set up

5128gap · Yesterday 17:48

Paganpentacle · Yesterday 16:58

So... if you don't have any inheritance to leave you get away with not contributing... again.
The burden always seems to fall on the same shouolders.

Neither the person with assets or the person without contributes. Because they are both dead.

IggysPop · Yesterday 17:48

Orangemintcream · Yesterday 17:21

State pension needs to rise with inflation to protect people from the cost of living rises.

I like the idea of 10% IHT for all aside from - for example - the first 10k - as well as phased tax bands - everyone ought to be paying something.

Then the NHS needs total reform. European style system instead with employer, insurance and individual payments via tax. Fix the waiting lists, allow people to see consultants when they need them and not have to wait a year to get in front of one.

I 100% agree with taxing wealth rather than income with IHT being a case in point. I am sure there are brilliant people working on different models as we speak. But this has been happening for years.

What this really needs is a good communication strategy about the model that is chosen as to why it is the fairest and most equitable. And then hope that people don’t selfishly choose the option that appears to impact them least - or by falling for the latest low cost lies party.

Witchlite · Yesterday 17:49

BiteSizedLife · Yesterday 17:13

"exceptijg between husband and wife"

Punish people who never found love.

how nice.

at this point I'm going to leave the lot to charity.

ETA - continue to punish... we already are punished IHT wise for not finding someone to marry.

Edited

My reason for excepting between husband and wife (include same sex etc) is because there is a state sanctioned partnership to share assets. So the tax should be applied after both have died.

It is not to punish anyone - just recognising the joint ownership in this instance.

if it is a punishment, it is against those who live together, but have not formed a civil partnership or marriage. However, this is usually a personal choice, as is the decision to leave everything to charity.

Dishwashersforever · Yesterday 17:54

5128gap · Yesterday 15:31

Getting rid of Inheritance tax isn't fair either though. Why should working people pay more tax so that other people get a big unearned windfall? The deceased doesn't lose out, because they're dead. The only losers in Inheritance tax are the beneficiaries who did nothing to earn it, so it seems one of the fairer taxes to me.
Agree that private care homes need scrutiny and ideally dispensing with.

But I think the million pound exemption ( when two parents leave a home to children or grandchildren) would be lifted so it’s swings and roundabouts really. You’re better off with ten percent of that than zero. The very rich will always have professional inheritance advice no what you do.

Ted27 · Yesterday 17:54

@TheFrendo

Do you have a source for that statistic?
I think you may be out by several hundred thousand

Darker · Yesterday 17:55

In my opinion we need to look at the money being made by the private companies running care homes and children’s homes. Take it back into public ownership.

magnomam · Yesterday 17:56

Ted27 · Yesterday 17:54

@TheFrendo

Do you have a source for that statistic?
I think you may be out by several hundred thousand

They will be no source because it’s absolutely nonsense

Lightuptheroom · Yesterday 18:02

Council run care homes used to exist, then the local authorities slowly closed them all and adopted the 'rent a bed' approach instead. I was an administrator for a group of 6 council run care homes, by 2015 they had closed them all

Ted27 · Yesterday 18:02

@magnomam

I know, but I like to give people a chance to evidence their claims

magnomam · Yesterday 18:04

I did too but I assume they realised it’s nonsense & scuttled off

Dishwashersforever · Yesterday 18:11

lolawasashowgirl · Yesterday 14:42

As I recall Teresa May’s death tax required a universal £30k contribution for free adult social care for life. I would absolutely have snapped her hand off for that as should anyone who had any genuine understanding of the cost of social care and how the system works.

Oh my goodness me too! 30 000 barely covers six months in a middle of the road carehome.

Swipe left for the next trending thread