Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to question no hosepipe ban exemption for people on benefits?

454 replies

Crosorbled · 14/07/2026 14:14

No hosepipe ban for people on benefits .

OP posts:
ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 14/07/2026 15:30

I don't understand how being disabled or being on benefits means you need to use a hosepipe more? We don't even have a hosepipe I don't think. If we do, I've never used it. Is it because some people can't carry a watering can for the garden?

Latenightreader · 14/07/2026 15:31

I do wonder whether the people fuming about their right to use a hosepipe despite the ban (put in place to try to conserve water for everyone when the reservoirs are low) are the same people who romanticise the Second World War and the way the country pulled together for the greater good...

EasternStandard · 14/07/2026 15:32

PosieNosie · 14/07/2026 15:30

I live in Scotland where there hasn't been a hosepipe ban in about thirty years, but I use a watering can filled from a water butt for my tomatoes because it's more environmentally friendly anyway.

I think it's fine to scold people for wasting water, littering, and leaving dog shit around, it's objectively rotten behaviour.

Just to check you think it’s bad for anyone to use a hosepipe when there’s no ban?

PosieNosie · 14/07/2026 15:35

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 14/07/2026 15:30

I don't understand how being disabled or being on benefits means you need to use a hosepipe more? We don't even have a hosepipe I don't think. If we do, I've never used it. Is it because some people can't carry a watering can for the garden?

Yes, it's more to do with the possibility of not being able to use alternatives, like watering cans (which you obviously can and should do if on benefits, but people on benefits aren't really the target of this exemption, it's just that some of them are caught by it because it avoids complex messaging that could lead to confusion about who is and isn't exempt).

ImpracticalMagic · 14/07/2026 15:37

angelos02 · 14/07/2026 14:25

OK - if it isn't the government imposing this nonsense, apologies, I didn't realise. Can someone answer the question - what condition requires a watered garden or a filled paddling pool over someone else?

I may be wrong, but I thought it was for those who would struggle with buckets/a watering can for the garden? As most non disabled people would manage to carry out buckets of water from the kitchen to fill a paddling pool, for example?

Jessiesjammy · 14/07/2026 15:37

So I get that people who are disabled are in a tariff because they may need to do more washings etc. Totally understand.

But why are they entitled to use their hose pipe and we are not?? What does watering your gardens or having filled pools got to do with having a disability?

Surely the hose pipe ban should be universal and the people on the tariff can still benefit from lower rates (or whatever it does)

Tableforjoan · 14/07/2026 15:39

Jessiesjammy · 14/07/2026 15:37

So I get that people who are disabled are in a tariff because they may need to do more washings etc. Totally understand.

But why are they entitled to use their hose pipe and we are not?? What does watering your gardens or having filled pools got to do with having a disability?

Surely the hose pipe ban should be universal and the people on the tariff can still benefit from lower rates (or whatever it does)

The theory is why can’t a child with a disabled parent have a pool or why can’t a disabled person have flowers / crops.

Just because that person cannot carry a watering can or bucket. Obviously some disabled people would still be able to depending on disability.

PosieNosie · 14/07/2026 15:40

EasternStandard · 14/07/2026 15:32

Just to check you think it’s bad for anyone to use a hosepipe when there’s no ban?

I think if you can use more environmentally friendly alternatives, like a watering can and water butt, you should. I think in general we should be following the Monty Don approach of changing the way we garden to account for and mitigate climate change, rather than blithely continuing to use unnecessarily large quantities of water with no regard to the environmental impact. Most of the time a hosepipe isn't necessary for watering, and is a very wasteful means of doing so.

That said, if there is no hosepipe ban in place and someone wants to fill up a (reasonably sized) paddling pool for their kids on a hot day then fine, go ahead. There's a balance to be struck between trying to be a good, environmentally conscious citizen and still living your life.

angelos02 · 14/07/2026 15:40

ThreadGuardDog · 14/07/2026 15:16

That’s great. A few more years of climate change with longer/more frequent heatwaves and you’ll be using it to store your drinking water when there’s nothing coming out of the taps.

I don't have kids so DH & I will no doubt use a fraction of water than those that do.

XenoBitch · 14/07/2026 15:40

I see the likes of The Daily Mail has succeeded in getting people to froth about benefits again.

It is aimed at people who would struggle with a watering can, such as people with Blue Badges and/or people on PIP who have disabilities that would make using a watering can difficult, rather than all people on benefits.

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 14/07/2026 15:41

ImpracticalMagic · 14/07/2026 15:37

I may be wrong, but I thought it was for those who would struggle with buckets/a watering can for the garden? As most non disabled people would manage to carry out buckets of water from the kitchen to fill a paddling pool, for example?

That makes sense and I understand that no-one wants their entire garden to turn to the Sahara after every heat wave. Regarding pools though, isn't the whole point of the ban to save water, so people shouldn't be using them right now? There are plenty of ways to cool down without a paddling pool and I'd argue that paddling pools aren't essential for anyone.

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 14/07/2026 15:42

angelos02 · 14/07/2026 15:40

I don't have kids so DH & I will no doubt use a fraction of water than those that do.

If you're regularly filling a pool large enough to take 3 hours of the hosepipe being on, I think having a kid is neither here nor there.

MrFluffyDogIsMyBestFriend · 14/07/2026 15:43

The reason that the middle classes are paying more tax is because billionaires are not paying any. They are a black hole sucking money out of the economy.

Therefore either the middle classes pay more tax or the welfare state is demolished (I'm quoting Gary Stevenson). Both of which are happening but the middle classes don't realise this because they're being told that more and more money is being paid to benefits recipients. And they've never tried to claim PIP so they think it's easy, when actually it's far more difficult now than it has ever been.

I'm wasting my breath. People just ignore it because there's nothing anyone can do.

chinupimdancing · 14/07/2026 15:44

Write to your water company and ask why they’ve enacted that policy

MaturingCheeseball · 14/07/2026 15:45

Why not just say, those who cannot carry a bucket may use a hose to water their plants ?

It’s ridiculous to extend the exemption to the non-disabled on a social tariff and imply it’s fine for them to wash cars/fill pools with a hose.

JudgeJ · 14/07/2026 15:48

Backedoffhackedoff · 14/07/2026 14:37

I’m actually laughing at people being jealous of disabled children because they get to USE THEIR HOSEPIPE

you couldn’t fucking make it up

But you could take statements and twist them to create a situation, just as you have done here.

Lexibletheflexible · 14/07/2026 15:48

youalright · 14/07/2026 14:27

Honestly people read a headline and instantly believe it, its embarrassing how gullible some adults are. Instead of actually reading the details

What's interesting on here is that I'd bet a fair amount of money the average IQ of the membership is significantly above the mean IQ for the country. Despite that, people are so ruled by their biases that they will not apply their usual standards of assessment to things they want to believe that align with their prejudices.

Lexibletheflexible · 14/07/2026 15:50

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 14/07/2026 15:41

That makes sense and I understand that no-one wants their entire garden to turn to the Sahara after every heat wave. Regarding pools though, isn't the whole point of the ban to save water, so people shouldn't be using them right now? There are plenty of ways to cool down without a paddling pool and I'd argue that paddling pools aren't essential for anyone.

Like what? Seriously? I haven't found a better way for kids or dogs, frankly. Hosing Hinself down when he was hot and grumpy even put him in a better mood!

Error404FucksNotFound · 14/07/2026 15:50

MargoLivebetter · 14/07/2026 15:27

I do wonder why the British press need to pit Brit against Brit. What does it achieve?!

Firstly, we have the frothers who are incensed that someone on benefits might be able to use a hosepipe, when they the hard working bill payer can't.

Then we have the frothers on benefits saying that they'll use their hosepipe if they damn well want to because they somehow qualify for doing that.

Then we have the frothers who think hosepipe bans are somehow to do with the Government, even though the water companies have been privately owned companies since the Conservative Govt privatised them in 1989 (yes that's nearly 30 years ago since the Government were responsible).

It has been hot and dry for a long time now in certain areas. The water supply is struggling - there are lots of reasons for this and we could have a variety of threads discussing this and I think that water companies have a great deal to answer for.

However, I can't help thinking that regardless of what the rights and wrongs are, that it would be a good idea for everyone to be more careful with their water consumption just until it rains again, without it turning into a battle about who can get around the hosepipe bans!

It achieves what is has always achieved. It gets ordinary people blaming each other instead of banding together.

Divide and rule.

MargoLivebetter · 14/07/2026 15:51

Maybe this story was seeded by one of the water companies, so that Non- Benefits Brits would froth against Benefits Brits about who is more or less entitled to use a hosepipe and that will be the massive argument, rather than what the fuck have the water companies been doing that this has happened in the first place!

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 14/07/2026 15:52

MargoLivebetter · 14/07/2026 15:51

Maybe this story was seeded by one of the water companies, so that Non- Benefits Brits would froth against Benefits Brits about who is more or less entitled to use a hosepipe and that will be the massive argument, rather than what the fuck have the water companies been doing that this has happened in the first place!

Well it's in the interests of water companies for us to use water isn't it, so I can't see why they'd cause a hosepipe ban on purpose. Water companies are willing to evacuate and flood Welsh villages just to obtain and sell more water. I'm sure if they could control the weather, we wouldn't have water shortages.

XenoBitch · 14/07/2026 15:52

I am surprised no one has asked how anyone on benefits could afford to live somewhere that has a garden, or who can afford plants in it.

Tableforjoan · 14/07/2026 15:53

XenoBitch · 14/07/2026 15:52

I am surprised no one has asked how anyone on benefits could afford to live somewhere that has a garden, or who can afford plants in it.

The pool and plants come free with the big tv and goat 🐐

Along with the free house with big garden.

MyDailyCake · 14/07/2026 15:53

Your title says no hosepipe ban exemption for people on benefits, but your post says there is an exemption.

MargoLivebetter · 14/07/2026 15:54

@ImImmortalNowBabyDoll no, it is in the interests of the water companies to reward their shareholders. We all have to use water, so that's neither here nor there!

Swipe left for the next trending thread