Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think these theatre prices are outrageous?

403 replies

takeharry · 08/07/2026 14:24

Currently looking at HAMILTON tickets, now I understand they have a ‘star’ casting in Leslie Odom Jr, original broadway cast but FIVE HUNDRED fucking pounds? For one ticket?

There are a few £250/£275 tickets left but the vast majority left are £500.

AIBU to think there should be some sort of regulatory body to prevent this kind of bullshit pricing?

£1k for a couple to have an evening at the theatre Biscuit

OP posts:
DeetAils · 10/07/2026 15:15

Are there people from the industry on here? I wonder how people feel about celebs taking the top roles.

I have to say, I don’t like it. Firstly, I see it as a distraction as a lot of the focus becomes about the celeb rather than the play. I also think that the top roles should be for people in the industry who have not become famous yet but who get the roles on the basis of their own talent. I don’t know if that is naive. And thirdly, I think it is a lot of pressure on the celeb. For example I didn’t think Sigourney Weaver was that bad at all in the Tempest but she got horrible reviews.

Or is it all good because it attracts people to the theatre? From what I can see though, people flock to the West End and the National etc, no matter what…?

DjokovicsTowel · 10/07/2026 15:38

Nofeckingway · 10/07/2026 12:13

I haven't read everything as too many replies . But the premise that ticket prices are way too high is correct . Nobody minds anyone making profit as they are indeed a business but these margins are not justified. Art and theatre should be attainable by everyone not just the well off. Opera has always had an elitist vibe and that is because it is cost prohibitive for many people . Ironically this is not what the composers intended as it was music and drama for the masses . It is a damn shame as so many people round live the opportunity to be exposed to more cultural things if they were able .

And as a supply and demand scenario, I call bullshit . It costs the same to put on a production each night whether the tickets were sold at £50 or £500 . Just greed for more profit .

£500 includes a hefty donation to charity

The cost to put it on might be the same but the more expensive tickets subsidise the cheaper tickets

Yokodoko · 10/07/2026 15:43

Bonkers prices 😡 I was looking at Glyndebourne events and they to are very expensive 🥲

DjokovicsTowel · 10/07/2026 15:50

DeetAils · 10/07/2026 13:45

What? I might’ve got the dates muddled, but we booked them well before they cast the show. So we saw Rachel Z with our £89 tickets. After the casting was announced the ticket prices went up, and increased exponentially during the last two weeks.

That's why

You booked before the big name announcement

plipplops · 10/07/2026 15:51

We saw it yesterday (bought tickets the day they went on sale) - I didn't pay anything like that much and it was BRILLIANT.

As an aside, we live in Bristol and tickets for the Hippodrome there are maybe £80pp which I think is loads considering the rake of the seats mean the view is nearly always terrible. The view at Hamilton was great.

DjokovicsTowel · 10/07/2026 15:58

DeetAils · 10/07/2026 15:15

Are there people from the industry on here? I wonder how people feel about celebs taking the top roles.

I have to say, I don’t like it. Firstly, I see it as a distraction as a lot of the focus becomes about the celeb rather than the play. I also think that the top roles should be for people in the industry who have not become famous yet but who get the roles on the basis of their own talent. I don’t know if that is naive. And thirdly, I think it is a lot of pressure on the celeb. For example I didn’t think Sigourney Weaver was that bad at all in the Tempest but she got horrible reviews.

Or is it all good because it attracts people to the theatre? From what I can see though, people flock to the West End and the National etc, no matter what…?

It's a devisive topic tbh

There's a difference between "stunt casting" - where someone is cast purely on their name and isn't talented/able and "big name casting" - where it's someone who has worked hard, is well known and is talented and able to do the role.

Working towards those big roles is what they aim for, giving it to "newcomers" could be seen as devaluing them

And lots of people do book purely on a name and it does help fill seats. But equally a lot of people feel they get overlooked for a stunt cast

LOJ is definitely not stunt casting

aMessageFromTheKing · 10/07/2026 16:41

DjokovicsTowel · 10/07/2026 15:58

It's a devisive topic tbh

There's a difference between "stunt casting" - where someone is cast purely on their name and isn't talented/able and "big name casting" - where it's someone who has worked hard, is well known and is talented and able to do the role.

Working towards those big roles is what they aim for, giving it to "newcomers" could be seen as devaluing them

And lots of people do book purely on a name and it does help fill seats. But equally a lot of people feel they get overlooked for a stunt cast

LOJ is definitely not stunt casting

It really varies, doesn't it? I think OG cast members and now-famous people with a strong theatrical background are usually very welcome. They bring in new audience members and get feature articles written about the production, not just a review in the theatre column.

I've seen people like Amy Adams, Bryan Cranston and James McAvoy in the West End, and they were all fantastic on the stage and also made sure to highlight other cast members in all the puff pieces and social media PR.

Very different to some big britches deciding to waltz in for a summer in London and do us all the favour of stealing a lead role because theatre seems quaint.

But stunt-casting gone wrong just pisses everyone off, sometimes disproportionately so. You'd better be pretty fucking great. Didn't Beanie Feldstein get absolutely trashed for doing Funny Girl? And she wasn't terrible, just... fine (apparently). Also Dylan Mulvaney in Six. Nothing worse than someone with middling skills being given the lead for clickbait, novelty, connections or whatever. You can't hide it when you're out of your depth in a live show.

In fairness, I thought Rachel Zegler in Evita was going to be similar, but she turned out to be amazing (and then I couldn't get one of the extremely expensive tickets). So you never know how it'll go.

DeetAils · 10/07/2026 16:53

DjokovicsTowel · 10/07/2026 15:50

That's why

You booked before the big name announcement

Well yes. I know. That’s what I was saying.

DeetAils · 10/07/2026 16:54

DjokovicsTowel · 10/07/2026 15:58

It's a devisive topic tbh

There's a difference between "stunt casting" - where someone is cast purely on their name and isn't talented/able and "big name casting" - where it's someone who has worked hard, is well known and is talented and able to do the role.

Working towards those big roles is what they aim for, giving it to "newcomers" could be seen as devaluing them

And lots of people do book purely on a name and it does help fill seats. But equally a lot of people feel they get overlooked for a stunt cast

LOJ is definitely not stunt casting

Yes. LOJ is a bona fide great stage artist.

Did Rachel Z start off on Broadway? I think my daughter said she did.

pinck · 10/07/2026 18:50

DeetAils · 10/07/2026 16:54

Yes. LOJ is a bona fide great stage artist.

Did Rachel Z start off on Broadway? I think my daughter said she did.

Nope. She made her break in Spielberg’s West Side Story and didn’t make her Broadway debut until about three years later in Romeo + Juliet.

Vargas · 10/07/2026 19:20

I just had a look and there are now tickets for £275. Maybe the £500 ones aren't selling so well....

KissKissByeBye · 10/07/2026 19:57

cardibach · 10/07/2026 14:28

Some seats will be horrendous. I saw Eddie Redmayne and Jessie Buckley in Cabaret for £30. There were tickets available costing multiple hundreds of pounds, but not all of them.
I agree that some theatre etiquette and politeness has disappeared though.

It’s because people who go to see West End musicals have often never been to the theatre apart from this particular musical, and they’ve never learned any. The rules of staying quiet are muddled by some musicals where the audience are encouraged to join in, and they’re more used to cinema where if you show up after the advertised time, it’s fine because you’ve only missed the trailers, and the volume is such that you could probably have a shouted conversation about who has the pick and mix during a car chase and no one around you would notice because everyone’s chatting or on their phones. I don’t think some people get their heads around the fact that there are live actors on stage a few feet away that you are distracting or annoying, and that there are people sitt8ng all round you who’ve come to hear that actor, not your rendition of ‘My Shot’, even if you do know all the words.

Which is not to say you’re not going to get some people misbehaving at an Albee play at the NT or the Donmar, but to nowhere near the same extent.

cardibach · 10/07/2026 20:40

That’s always been the case though @KissKissByeBye - why is it worse recently?

Jane379 · 10/07/2026 20:46

GeorgeMichaelsCat · 10/07/2026 04:09

I looked at tickets to see Jesus's Christ Superstar with Sam Ryder. To get a seat near the stage was nearly £700.

Yes, but to see the show you could pay less than £40. It' one thing for the best seats to be crazy, another for seeing the show itself to be a crazy price

fromgothtoboss · 10/07/2026 20:51

Seat view websites are always good, you often find that some seats, including those marked as restricted, are surprisingly good value for money.

GeorgeMichaelsCat · 10/07/2026 22:16

Jane379 · 10/07/2026 20:46

Yes, but to see the show you could pay less than £40. It' one thing for the best seats to be crazy, another for seeing the show itself to be a crazy price

Maybe for you. I don't want to see a stick insect on the stage versus up close.

pinck · 11/07/2026 00:41

aMessageFromTheKing · 10/07/2026 16:41

It really varies, doesn't it? I think OG cast members and now-famous people with a strong theatrical background are usually very welcome. They bring in new audience members and get feature articles written about the production, not just a review in the theatre column.

I've seen people like Amy Adams, Bryan Cranston and James McAvoy in the West End, and they were all fantastic on the stage and also made sure to highlight other cast members in all the puff pieces and social media PR.

Very different to some big britches deciding to waltz in for a summer in London and do us all the favour of stealing a lead role because theatre seems quaint.

But stunt-casting gone wrong just pisses everyone off, sometimes disproportionately so. You'd better be pretty fucking great. Didn't Beanie Feldstein get absolutely trashed for doing Funny Girl? And she wasn't terrible, just... fine (apparently). Also Dylan Mulvaney in Six. Nothing worse than someone with middling skills being given the lead for clickbait, novelty, connections or whatever. You can't hide it when you're out of your depth in a live show.

In fairness, I thought Rachel Zegler in Evita was going to be similar, but she turned out to be amazing (and then I couldn't get one of the extremely expensive tickets). So you never know how it'll go.

Yes, exactly, that’s the distinction people keep missing. Stunt casting is not “recognizable person in a show.” It’s someone being cast mainly because their name, follower count, or novelty value will generate attention regardless of whether they can actually carry the role. A proper theatre name, an original cast member, or someone with serious stage training is just star casting.

Leslie is obviously not stunt casting. He is an established stage performer with a major theatre résumé and the ability to back it up. Same with Aaron Tveit, Jeremy Jordan, Jonathan Groff, Audra McDonald, Sutton Foster, Idina Menzel, etc. These people are famous within theatre because they are genuinely good.

Beanie was different because the issue was not “how dare a known person be cast,” it was whether she had the vocal/stage fit for that specific role. That’s where stunt-casting criticism actually makes sense, but lumping bona fide theatre performers in with random novelty casting just because their names sell tickets is stupid. Ticket-selling ability does not magically cancel out talent. Sometimes people become names because they can actually do the job.

And honestly, Lea Michele should have been cast in Funny Girl from the start. Before anyone starts shrieking “stunt casting,” she got her start on Broadway as a child, did Spring Awakening, and could actually sing the score. That is not a random famous person being shoved into a lead because marketing panicked. That is someone with an actual theatre background being cast in a role she was obviously suited for.

I’d argue the recent Chess revival is another example. Even with a theatre name like Aaron Tveit involved, the production clearly depended heavily on Lea’s presence. The show ended up closing on the same date she was due to leave, which rather proves the point: her casting was not just some gimmick, it was a major reason the revival worked commercially at all. That is not stunt casting, that is a bankable theatre performer helping make a notoriously difficult show viable.

Melancholyflower · 11/07/2026 10:23

takeharry · 08/07/2026 15:47

Some people love to stick the boot in for no reason. I bet none of them would pay it either though!

You've posted in AIBU, so there will always be people who just want to argue how unreasonable you are. Most of them will have no interest in the price of Hamilton tickets, or that they are much more expensive whilst he is in it. If you had posted elsewhere you might have got a discussion about whether the price hike is really justified, rather than a pile-on.

Nofeckingway · 11/07/2026 11:15

@DjokovicsTowel Great if you can afford to donate a large sum for charity but a ticket for £250 is still too much . I saw Hamilton already , it was great but let's face it , it's a contemporary musical show that should be more affordable for more people .

cardibach · 11/07/2026 11:16

GeorgeMichaelsCat · 10/07/2026 22:16

Maybe for you. I don't want to see a stick insect on the stage versus up close.

This sounds like someone who hasn’t tried the cheaper seats. It’s not like that at all. Plus for a musical some height and distance is positively beneficial for seeing the full effect of dances and stage dressing.

fundamentallyauthentic · 11/07/2026 11:18

Nofeckingway · 11/07/2026 11:15

@DjokovicsTowel Great if you can afford to donate a large sum for charity but a ticket for £250 is still too much . I saw Hamilton already , it was great but let's face it , it's a contemporary musical show that should be more affordable for more people .

Not all the tickets are priced at £250 or £500.

GeorgeMichaelsCat · 11/07/2026 11:41

cardibach · 11/07/2026 11:16

This sounds like someone who hasn’t tried the cheaper seats. It’s not like that at all. Plus for a musical some height and distance is positively beneficial for seeing the full effect of dances and stage dressing.

I have, thank you very much. Been close to the stage, up in the gods and everywhere in between. How arrogant to think you know someone else's experiences.

cardibach · 11/07/2026 11:50

GeorgeMichaelsCat · 11/07/2026 11:41

I have, thank you very much. Been close to the stage, up in the gods and everywhere in between. How arrogant to think you know someone else's experiences.

Arrogant? To say my experience of cheap seats doesn’t match yours so to wonder whether you have tried it? What an odd thing to get on your high horse about.
Cheap seats are fine. It isn’t ’stick insects’ and for some, possibly all, musicals, they are actually better than the more expensive ones for grasping the whole production.

fundamentallyauthentic · 11/07/2026 12:19

There’s cheap and then there’s really cheap. The latter offer shit views and are just not bothering with, in my view, especially if you can watch the show at home. The area where those really cheap tickets are situated is called “The Gods” for a good reason.

pinck · 11/07/2026 12:22

cardibach · 11/07/2026 11:50

Arrogant? To say my experience of cheap seats doesn’t match yours so to wonder whether you have tried it? What an odd thing to get on your high horse about.
Cheap seats are fine. It isn’t ’stick insects’ and for some, possibly all, musicals, they are actually better than the more expensive ones for grasping the whole production.

Oh, please. Telling someone they "haven't tried the cheaper seats" just because they actually want to see the actors' faces is the ultimate theater cope.

Let's be real—if you prefer a front-row mezzanine view to see the full choreography, that’s completely valid. But guess what? Those premium mezzanine seats cost just as much as prime orchestra. You aren't saving a dime; you're just picking a different VIP view.

Sitting way up in the balcony, however, has never been an artistic vantage point—it's a budget constraint. Enjoy your "beneficial height and distance".