Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Polanski is a buffoon

1000 replies

Bertiebiscuit · 07/02/2026 18:28

How anyone can take the Green party leader Zac Polanski seriously is completely beyond me. He has zero grasp of economics, beyond conning women out of ££££s by pretending he could hypnotise them to increase their bust measurements. He is the worst representative of gay men who worship the men pretending to be women, with no regard for womens and girls' right to privacy, dignity and safety. The man is a 24 carat buffoon.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
Goldenbear · 10/02/2026 08:18

EasternStandard · 10/02/2026 08:08

Shill means someone is being paid to promote online. It’s not a factual description at all but one uses by pro Labour a lot on here. You shouldn’t accuse pp with this for having different views to your own.

And the thicko stuff yes is an attempt at an insult.

Exactly, it is a description not a feeling. Opinions straight out of the extreme right handbook do appear to come across in this way.

I don't why you quoted my post and didn't read it. Collective thick is in response to the unquestioning adherence to the extreme right line of thought. I literally described how I was battling off the bullies because they don't like me highlighting the attack on Liberal democracies even though such a destruction would be devastating for women's rights. You aren't going to shout me down either so don't bother trying.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:18

As pp said, if you don’t want women to be turned off by left wing parties, you need to tell them to drop the mad shit. Your position is completely incoherent, one minute apparently no one cares what we think (so?) and the next we’re responsible for the right wing gaining ground. Try to get your posts to make sense occasionally, maybe?

Goldenbear · 10/02/2026 08:18

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:05

And actually don’t bother, I don’t care about anything you have to say, I’ll wait until there is someone worth engaging with.

Oh you don't like your bullying collective behaviour, your anti democratic beliefs being highlighted. I get it.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:19

EasternStandard · 10/02/2026 08:08

Shill means someone is being paid to promote online. It’s not a factual description at all but one uses by pro Labour a lot on here. You shouldn’t accuse pp with this for having different views to your own.

And the thicko stuff yes is an attempt at an insult.

It’s a bit of an ironic one IMO.

Goldenbear · 10/02/2026 08:20

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:18

As pp said, if you don’t want women to be turned off by left wing parties, you need to tell them to drop the mad shit. Your position is completely incoherent, one minute apparently no one cares what we think (so?) and the next we’re responsible for the right wing gaining ground. Try to get your posts to make sense occasionally, maybe?

Again, the clarity is there, but you prefer to denigrate as you are a bully of people that don't agree with you. I voted for greens with Caroline Lucas as the Leader, I am a voter, I don't have loyalty to any party. Tell them yourself.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:20

Shill

collective thick

hairy handed desciples (sic)

you’re the bully.

FMLGFastMovingLuxuryGoods · 10/02/2026 08:20

Goldenbear · 10/02/2026 01:03

Gender identity as a topic of concern is not realistically on the voting public's radar and you said yourself that your teens are over it or something like that. There are bigger problems to worry about with regards to women's rights.

No, I said they laugh at “identify as” nonsense. But given policymakers and politicians are not enforcing the SC ruling, this ideology which is endangering women is very much on women’s radar. So many groups are having tantrums over the ruling - which shows that nobody should ever have been letting men in our spaces in the first place - that enforcing the law remains high on our radar
its so weird you keep insisting it isn’t on women’s radara, without a scrap of evidence.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:21

Goldenbear · 10/02/2026 08:20

Again, the clarity is there, but you prefer to denigrate as you are a bully of people that don't agree with you. I voted for greens with Caroline Lucas as the Leader, I am a voter, I don't have loyalty to any party. Tell them yourself.

As I pointed out, your voting for the Greens is pure self indulgence by your own yardstick.

FMLGFastMovingLuxuryGoods · 10/02/2026 08:23

Goldenbear · 10/02/2026 01:09

I was responding to the stream of invective directed towards me.

It’s a discussion form, people will disagree with you. The fact you respond by name calling and insults (when nobody else has done anywhere near the same) shows total petulance and unwillingness to engage.

FMLGFastMovingLuxuryGoods · 10/02/2026 08:24

Goldenbear · 10/02/2026 01:11

Well if you have taken from my posts that I don't worry then you have really misunderstood my position and there isn't I can say to alter that so on that note I am off.

Flounce number 2, commenced.

You said not only that nobody cares but you told another poster it’s morally wrong to put women’s rights first above other policies like homelessness

AnnasFangs · 10/02/2026 08:25

As pp said, if you don’t want women to be turned off by left wing parties, you need to tell them to drop the mad shit

Are women being turned off left wing parties? There is a surge in young women turning to the Greens atm.

theweek.com/politics/why-young-women-voting-green

I am not a Green btw. I don't really like Polanski.

EasternStandard · 10/02/2026 08:30

Goldenbear · 10/02/2026 08:18

Exactly, it is a description not a feeling. Opinions straight out of the extreme right handbook do appear to come across in this way.

I don't why you quoted my post and didn't read it. Collective thick is in response to the unquestioning adherence to the extreme right line of thought. I literally described how I was battling off the bullies because they don't like me highlighting the attack on Liberal democracies even though such a destruction would be devastating for women's rights. You aren't going to shout me down either so don't bother trying.

Yes it’s not a factual description at all I can’t believe you can’t see this. Would you be ok with being called a Green / Labour shill?

Stop using it and just make points and you won’t get such pushback in return.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:34

AnnasFangs · 10/02/2026 08:25

As pp said, if you don’t want women to be turned off by left wing parties, you need to tell them to drop the mad shit

Are women being turned off left wing parties? There is a surge in young women turning to the Greens atm.

theweek.com/politics/why-young-women-voting-green

I am not a Green btw. I don't really like Polanski.

It’s pp who is raging about it, ask them.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:39

EasternStandard · 10/02/2026 08:30

Yes it’s not a factual description at all I can’t believe you can’t see this. Would you be ok with being called a Green / Labour shill?

Stop using it and just make points and you won’t get such pushback in return.

I think this poster is enjoying it all hugely, IMO.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:42

Anyway, how about Zack Polanski being delighted that a violent male thug wasn’t convicted for battering a female police officer with a sledgehammer while committing a criminal offence? I’d like to see how all these very moral people square that.

Goldenbear · 10/02/2026 08:42

FMLGFastMovingLuxuryGoods · 10/02/2026 08:24

Flounce number 2, commenced.

You said not only that nobody cares but you told another poster it’s morally wrong to put women’s rights first above other policies like homelessness

Wow, how do you have the bravado to misrepresent people in this way. That was stated precisely fucking nowhere but you have plucked that out of context to suit your own extreme right sympathies. You are anti liberal democracies I get it but why?

AnnasFangs · 10/02/2026 08:43

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:34

It’s pp who is raging about it, ask them.

But you agreed with the statement in your post.

Goldenbear · 10/02/2026 08:45

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:39

I think this poster is enjoying it all hugely, IMO.

Again, I disagree with you so on to the next installment of the extreme right play book, close down the discussion by making it personal.

Why are you intent on destroying Liberal democracies where freedoms and rights of women are protected?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:47

@AnnasFangs

You ignored half my post. Women are being turned off by the Greens, I never claimed it was a majority. The point I was making is that the poster’s claims were all over the place. If you want to discuss why a lot of women do support the Greens, I don’t have any issue with that, it’s just not something I’m personally interested in debating.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:48

Goldenbear · 10/02/2026 08:45

Again, I disagree with you so on to the next installment of the extreme right play book, close down the discussion by making it personal.

Why are you intent on destroying Liberal democracies where freedoms and rights of women are protected?

You’re very funny.

AnnasFangs · 10/02/2026 08:50

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:47

@AnnasFangs

You ignored half my post. Women are being turned off by the Greens, I never claimed it was a majority. The point I was making is that the poster’s claims were all over the place. If you want to discuss why a lot of women do support the Greens, I don’t have any issue with that, it’s just not something I’m personally interested in debating.

I can understand why you don't want to debate that, so fair enough.

Goldenbear · 10/02/2026 08:51

FMLGFastMovingLuxuryGoods · 10/02/2026 08:23

It’s a discussion form, people will disagree with you. The fact you respond by name calling and insults (when nobody else has done anywhere near the same) shows total petulance and unwillingness to engage.

As I explained in a previous post, I responded in kind to the bullying behaviour of someone i.e. me, I was called a sociopath and it got deleted. How is that not abuse?

Take your own advice here, it is a chat forum, I disagree with you, that's allowed.

Why don't you want to live in a Liberal democracy?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:52

Goldenbear · 10/02/2026 08:42

Wow, how do you have the bravado to misrepresent people in this way. That was stated precisely fucking nowhere but you have plucked that out of context to suit your own extreme right sympathies. You are anti liberal democracies I get it but why?

You did say that. You said it was morally wrong to support women’s sex based rights. The only person who has actually misrepresented anyone is you, remember that you already made up that this poster called you “hysterical” and used it to wang on about how sexist she was. She didn’t call you hysterical, it was a fabrication. “Hysterical” is a sex based insult, “unhinged” is not. You also pretended to be “young” when you aren’t. Desperate.

Goldenbear · 10/02/2026 08:55

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:47

@AnnasFangs

You ignored half my post. Women are being turned off by the Greens, I never claimed it was a majority. The point I was making is that the poster’s claims were all over the place. If you want to discuss why a lot of women do support the Greens, I don’t have any issue with that, it’s just not something I’m personally interested in debating.

They have been consistent. I voted Greens under Caroline Lucas. I'm not a Green party Member. I think echoing the far right on this is not going to help the cause for women's rights. I was flabbergasted that a poster was justifying a vote for Trump and upholding women's rights in the same breath!

Why do you want the complete destruction of Liberal Democracies?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/02/2026 08:56

AnnasFangs · 10/02/2026 08:50

I can understand why you don't want to debate that, so fair enough.

Edited

I don’t care. They’re misguided, but it’s up to them. Hope that helps.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread