Also, as usual, the populism is string with this one. And wasn't he all in favour of repeal & replace, then repeal only, then repeal & replace again and now apparently whatever this incoherent message is meant to convey.
FWIW, when I say I don't fundamentally disagree what I really mean is that I don't disagree with the notion of people over profit. But then again, having spent 30 seconds thinking about it, I've come to the conclusion that this can't be what he's trying to say because ... well, there's his entire biography.