Do you think Michael Jackson was guilty?

[InnocentOrGuilty]

Of the sexual abuse of boys.
I'm interested in a poll.
G = you think he was definitely guilty
I = you think he was innocent
(Stemming from a debate with DH last night!)

I’d be more concerned that someone was offering a payout in the first place in an attempt to shush me and stop it going to court. But personally, as a mother I would not accept a payout, I’d want it to go to court if I honestly felt that person was guilty so yes I do find it strange that it was settled that way but I also think MJ is guilty.

Because he was messed up. He didn't think of it as wrong.

I'm not saying I'm right, but this is just my gut. He wasn't right in the mind, in my opinion. Perhaps this is just what I would like to believe!

Guilty but if you ask this question in the US I'm sure they would say innocent as he was like royalty there.

Guilty but his music is still so revered and played everywhere. Rolf Harris and Gary Glitter less so.

Jarvis Cocker invading his sickening display on the brits was genius at the time but watching it back now 😳
He was literally flaunting his repulsive behaviour in our faces - thank god Jarvis was brave enough to try and disrupt it.

Guilty without a doubt.

Where is the record?

Innocent.

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/real-crime-profile/id1081244497?i=1000434021398

Yes, guilty but protected by his fame.

@Mirabai thanks, before I listen to a biased podcast, do you know the name of the the FBI agent? is he being interviewed on the podcast or is it just the podcaster talking about him?

Innocent.

It started through one person realising that they could sue. Then began the money train that everybody decided to jump on.

I believe Michael Jackson never reached psychological maturation and his looking after boys particularly white boys was to try to relive his own childhood in a new way. I believe he was generous and naive and it was all a psychological role play for his childhood self which he projected onto the children. He wanted to be the father he never had to his own self and did it projected through others.

I believe people around him saw his vulnerability or even themselves believed that he did it. Then they went after him.

He was cleared at trial.

The two latest accusers in the documentary have gained a lot. There was a lot to gain in accusing Michael Jackson and people went for it.

He’s in the podcast. Why would the FBI agent be biased?

There speaks someone who has never listened to any of the victims’ testimony or sifted through the detailed list of all the sordid stuff the police found in his room and his pc searches - endless porn and photos of young boys.

The horrifying thing is that it was clear he had considered trying to adopt kids.

Newsflash: he was an adult with adult sexual tastes and the little boy lost persona was simply a ruse to groom you and his victims. How anyone was fooled was beyond me.

Did anyone here ever seen him in real life?

No I am not a Michael Jackson fan so have no skin in this game .. however I am a criminal investigator who followed the trial and evidence presented ..!just from professional interest..

I absolutely believe he was innocent.. everyone who thinks he is guilty needs to look back on his life !!he simply had NO CHILDHOOD and try to recreate it .

So how do you explain the porn?

He did not have child pornography, that is a lie. Read here about it: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/no-child-porn-found-at-neverland-thenor-now-the_b_577fdfbce4b0f06648f4a3f8

biased podcast

is what I said

Michael Jackson was not in possession of any child pornography.

thank you

Guilty- not even a question of doubt in my mind.

How do you know it’s biased if you have listened to it? He’s one of the 3 people discussing the case.

I did not say he did if you read my post more carefully.

however I am a criminal investigator who followed the trial and evidence presented ..!just from professional interest..

Not a very good one clearly.

Have you watching Leaving Neverland?