Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

"Darlington Nurses" vs County Durham and Darlington NHS Trust Tribunal Thread 9

419 replies

ThreeWordHarpy · 16/01/2026 12:36

Thread 1, 7-Oct to 23-Oct
Thread 2, 23-Oct to 28-Oct
Thread 3, 28-Oct to 29-Oct
Thread 4, 29-Oct to 31-Oct
Thread 5, 31-Oct to 04-Nov
Thread 6, 04-Nov to 05-Nov
Thread 7, 05-Nov to 11-Nov
Thread 8, 11-Nov to 16-Jan (last thread with the schedule and abbreviations)

Five nurses working at Darlington Memorial Hospital filed a legal case against their employer, an NHS trust, for sexual harassment and sex discrimination. The nurses objected to sharing the women’s changing facilities with a male colleague, Rose, who identifies as female. The hearing was held between 20th October and 11th November and was live tweeted by Tribunal Tweets who have comprehensive information regarding this case on their substack, including archives of the twitter threads, lists of people involved and press releases.

At the time this thread was started, the judgment had not yet been published on the Courts website but was widely reported in the media that the NHS was found to have discriminated against the nurses, but the claims against Rose were not upheld.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
Holymolymoon · 24/06/2026 16:48

Can I just ask, are the new unisex facilities being provided in addition to the single sex facilities, or replacing them?

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 24/06/2026 16:28

This is great news. It will be very hard for employers to ignore this result, surely?

singthing · 24/06/2026 16:24

I can almost feel the fury burning through the words "sincere apologies" from the Trust's letter. They would have been apoplectic at having been found so dismally contrary to the law first of all, and now they have to APOLOGISE as well?

Good. Now go "learn your lessons".

MyAmpleSheep · 24/06/2026 13:46

Damages for malpractice £3.3bn, damages for harassment, £0.00018bn

lcakethereforeIam · 24/06/2026 13:43

If £1m is such a piddling amount I hope this guy sues for being prosecuted and jailed for stealing only a little over a 10th of that

https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/former-nhs-manager-jailed-ps123000-fraud

His barrister could have pointed out how other NHS managers have been allowed to blithely piss away much, much more than he took.

The Trust's victim statement said

the money could have been used to improve patient care, for example providing additional roles within GP practices to supply more healthcare appointments for patients. The statement outlined that the funds could have paid for:
• Four Nursing Associates for a year or,
• Two Community Paramedics for a year or,
• Two Clinical Pharmacists for a year.
• One tenth of a court case trying to ensure a man could get his kit off where women (nurses no less) were also attempting to get changed.

Former NHS manager jailed for £123,000 fraud | The Crown Prosecution Service

https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/former-nhs-manager-jailed-ps123000-fraud

PrettyDamnCosmic · 24/06/2026 13:32

MyAmpleSheep · 24/06/2026 13:29

NHS Legal’s budget is in excess of £3bn per year. This isn’t a rounding error on a rounding error error.

NHS Legal’s budget is in excess of £3bn per year.

I believe that includes all the compensation paid out for clinical negligence cases.

MyAmpleSheep · 24/06/2026 13:29

Madcats · 24/06/2026 13:06

If Darlington NHS has £603k legal costs and has to pay Darlington nurses £187k (their legal costs subject to a further hearing), I can’t see there being any change from £1M.

I hope there are some tough conversations going on in “NHS Legal”.

3 years this has been going on!

NHS Legal’s budget is in excess of £3bn per year. This isn’t a rounding error on a rounding error error.

sohard · 24/06/2026 13:27

The NHS trust not ruling out disciplinary action is outrageous!! How much more of our money is to be spent on their witch hunt against GC women?!

GailBlancheViola · 24/06/2026 13:26

Excellent news for the nurses and well deserved.

I did like the dig in the threadreader about the NHS spending £603,000 and counting on legal fees to defend allowing men to have access to women in their changing rooms. That is the crux of the matter - MEN accessing unconsenting women in a state of undress, it beggars belief. Only the worst kind of person would insist on that happening, there is something very wrong with the peole who advocate for, demand and attempt to impose this.

moto748e · 24/06/2026 13:07

And their union hung them out to dry. Shame on all of them who don't do their core job of supporting their members.

Madcats · 24/06/2026 13:06

If Darlington NHS has £603k legal costs and has to pay Darlington nurses £187k (their legal costs subject to a further hearing), I can’t see there being any change from £1M.

I hope there are some tough conversations going on in “NHS Legal”.

3 years this has been going on!

CassOle · 24/06/2026 12:56

impossibletoday · 24/06/2026 12:37

Nitter version: https://nitter.poast.org/CConcern/status/2069736250701992281#r

PrettyDamnCosmic · 24/06/2026 12:44

It's a pretty full & frank aploogy with substantial costs awarded but there are still some unresolved matters...

The Trust has, however, refused to rule out taking disciplinary action against the nurses for speaking about their case, despite the Tribunal ruling going to the media was ‘a protected act.’

“We call upon the Trust to immediately ensure that all NMC disciplinary action against the Darlington nurses for bringing their case is immediately withdrawn.”

christianconcern.com/ccpressreleases/darlington-nurses-legal-victory-trust-pays-out-187000-in-damages-apologises-and-commits-to-separate-changing-facilities-between-male-and-female-staff/

FarriersGirl · 24/06/2026 12:41

Brilliant news for the nurses and the trust will have to pay costs of the case on top. I assume this will reverberate around the NHS trusts and make them take notice.....or maybe not as they seem to have great difficulty coming to terms with the law.

moto748e · 21/06/2026 01:34

And so Labour give people (well, women, mostly) more reason not to trust them. I have no great hope or faith in Burnham over Starmer, but at least maybe he's a bit better at reading the room?

Not that I'm at all convinced that Labour could win the next GE anyway.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 21/06/2026 01:25

lcakethereforeIam · 20/06/2026 22:07

I'm just adding this because I don't believe I've seen it mentioned elsewhere. Wes Streeting would have met with the Darlington nurses a few days ago if he had continued in post. I read that James Murray, his replacement, did not keep the meeting and I'm not aware that he has any plans to reschedule it.

Wanker.

CassOle · 20/06/2026 22:08

Typical.

lcakethereforeIam · 20/06/2026 22:07

I'm just adding this because I don't believe I've seen it mentioned elsewhere. Wes Streeting would have met with the Darlington nurses a few days ago if he had continued in post. I read that James Murray, his replacement, did not keep the meeting and I'm not aware that he has any plans to reschedule it.

ItsCoolForCats · 06/06/2026 17:50

ickky · 05/06/2026 23:09

Interview with the Darlington Nurses on WRN

Interestingly Beth said the HR lady, the one that wanted them to be re educated by Rose, apparently cried when she heard the Judgement.

I listened to this earlier. I love that they don't hold back 😄

Shocking that the are still under investigation by the Nursing a d Midwifery Council.

ickky · 05/06/2026 23:09

Interview with the Darlington Nurses on WRN

Interestingly Beth said the HR lady, the one that wanted them to be re educated by Rose, apparently cried when she heard the Judgement.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4maHxkgXTE

MistyGreenAndBlue · 23/01/2026 16:30

RedToothBrush · 23/01/2026 16:16

I was bloody agreeing with you in the first fucking place! Sometimes I quote and highlight a point TO BACK IT UP.

I do it a lot. It's my posting style.

It wasn't my mistake. It was yours.

And yes you did ruddy demand an acknowledgement that 'id made a mistake'.

Seriously.

I acknowledged that I had misunderstood you and apologised and accepted that you hadn't actually misunderstood me as another poster did.
There doesn't seem to be anything else to say.
Except I guess we can agree to ... er agree? 😂

RedToothBrush · 23/01/2026 16:16

MistyGreenAndBlue · 23/01/2026 16:12

Don't remember "demanding" anything. Just made a passing remark that you seemed to also have misunderstood me and had not acknowledged my reply.

I do not think that you were "out to get me" just that it appeared you had misunderstood my (admittedly badly written) post. You say you didn't. Ok I accept that.
I think if another poster hadn't jumped all over me for it, leading me to feel as if I was being misunderstood all round, I would probably have left it at that. I just wanted to explain what I actually meant - just as you have done here.
(and that I would never suggest something so horrendous).

I was definitely a bit upset at the idea that I was being thought to have said religious beliefs are a mental illness and probably overreacted to that poster who said that and dragged you into it by tagging you in my fuller explanation. So, sorry for that.

FWIW I think we agree on this which is all I originally intended to convey.

I was bloody agreeing with you in the first fucking place! Sometimes I quote and highlight a point TO BACK IT UP.

I do it a lot. It's my posting style.

It wasn't my mistake. It was yours.

And yes you did ruddy demand an acknowledgement that 'id made a mistake'.

Seriously.