I see the usual victim blamer / rape apologists are out in force.
Rather than ask what these ‘groupies’ - who in a lot of cases were CHILDREN - hoped to gain, maybe ask why DW consistently targeted 14/15 year olds not known for being worldly wise or sensible.
Lucy Beaumont has done an interview with Cathy Newman where she talks about a young man who worked with Walliams being told to bring young girls to his dressing room. He went to Lucy for help because he knew what was happening was wrong. She reached out to the victims.
In almost every case the girls were described as ‘very working class’, not from London and generally quite naive or vulnerable.
Any one with half a brain can put together why a millionaire tv star would be approaching young girls with no money, from unglamorous backgrounds, with little to no life experience who might find navigating a big city to find help if they found themselves in trouble daunting.
Many of the incidences predate social media / digital saviness. Same with Brand’s offending. As young people became more online and arguably savvier or at least less naive about finding help or being able to document things that are now less tolerated, the opportunity for these predators diminished.
But having half a brain would be more than most rape apologists could aspire to, I suppose.