Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Jonathan Ross

204 replies

Undahpressurah · Yesterday 13:49

Is he next?

thought this could be a good place to discuss his ‘jokes’ about a 15 year old going home with Walliams. He clearly knew far more about Brand and Walliams than he let on.

Repulsive.

OP posts:
Fedupmumofadultsons · Yesterday 19:18

Additup · Yesterday 15:01

Im not sure how JR can be criticised in that scenario. Presumably he was doing Lily Allen a favour by moving her?

This exactly if anything JR was actually protecting lily Allen nothing wrong with that x

Puppylucky · Yesterday 19:26

Re the Comedy Awards comment which is causing so much angst has it not occurred to anyone that it is actually a jibe / reveal against David Walliams? This show was screened in 2005 ( JR makes reference to it being the 15th year) - long before any rumours really leaked out about his behaviour. By calling out David Walliams preferences albeit in a jokey way JR is actually sending up a red flag - or is that too generous a reading for this thread !

Puppylucky · Yesterday 19:27

Redbags · Yesterday 18:47

There's a picture in the news today with Walliams arm round a teen he's accused of grooming. Surprise surprise, Ross is in the picture too.

Along with his wife and 10 other people.

Redbags · Yesterday 19:30

Puppylucky · Yesterday 19:26

Re the Comedy Awards comment which is causing so much angst has it not occurred to anyone that it is actually a jibe / reveal against David Walliams? This show was screened in 2005 ( JR makes reference to it being the 15th year) - long before any rumours really leaked out about his behaviour. By calling out David Walliams preferences albeit in a jokey way JR is actually sending up a red flag - or is that too generous a reading for this thread !

Edited

Yes, it was a good natured bantery jibe at Walliams. Just what should happen to sex offenders. It shows "they" knew and did nothing.

newNannie2026 · Yesterday 19:30

totally agree. always found Ross creepy (not as much as Brand and Walliams) but he is up there on my radar

Redbags · Yesterday 19:31

Puppylucky · Yesterday 19:27

Along with his wife and 10 other people.

Yes, who would have all been aware of his behaviour around teenage girls. I have never said Ross was involved, only that too many people knew and did nothing.

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · Yesterday 19:36

Redbags · Yesterday 19:31

Yes, who would have all been aware of his behaviour around teenage girls. I have never said Ross was involved, only that too many people knew and did nothing.

And you know for a FACT that his wife and everyone in that photo knew of his behaviour, do you? Seriously?

Redbags · Yesterday 19:37

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · Yesterday 19:36

And you know for a FACT that his wife and everyone in that photo knew of his behaviour, do you? Seriously?

Well saw how he was behaving that evening. I don't need to know it as a FACT, to express the opinion that it seems likely they did.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · Yesterday 19:42

Redbags · Yesterday 18:52

Infantised or now recognised that all those oh so mature 16yos were acutely vulnerable?

I mean, it used to be OK to send 5yos up chimneys.

There's middle ground here. I get the sense that some children and teenagers now are not expected to do anything much independently and unsupervised. They have so little life experience that there has to be a risk that they're just not learning essential life skills that many of us acquired in childhood - social skills, character assessment, spotting the early signs that someone else is trouble and backing away. Yes, there were some huge risks in leaving children so much on their own in the past, but the risks in not giving children some independence are also considerable.

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · Yesterday 19:44

Redbags · Yesterday 19:37

Well saw how he was behaving that evening. I don't need to know it as a FACT, to express the opinion that it seems likely they did.

Edited

But you didn't say LIKELY, did you?

"Yes, who would have all been aware of his behaviour around teenage girls"

That's quite a difference. Legally, in particular.

Puppylucky · Yesterday 19:45

Redbags · Yesterday 19:30

Yes, it was a good natured bantery jibe at Walliams. Just what should happen to sex offenders. It shows "they" knew and did nothing.

If going home with a drunk 15 year old girl was seen as disgusting/ dodgy at the time - as it should have been - why is calling out that behaviour in front of DWs peers "good natured and bantery"

Puppylucky · Yesterday 19:47

newNannie2026 · Yesterday 19:30

totally agree. always found Ross creepy (not as much as Brand and Walliams) but he is up there on my radar

Sorry this "on my radar" comment that is becoming compulsory just makes me laugh! Is MN populated by a colony of bats?!

YourAmplePlumPoster · Yesterday 19:49

Redbags · Yesterday 18:52

Infantised or now recognised that all those oh so mature 16yos were acutely vulnerable?

I mean, it used to be OK to send 5yos up chimneys.

It also used to be OK for young people to take on responsibilities like work, providing for families and taking responsibility for their behaviour but now they're apparently too vulnerable.

JuliaBraverman · Yesterday 19:52

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · Yesterday 14:41

In the Victorian era it was very very commonplace that there were significant age gaps between men and women. Not saying it's right, just a fact.

I still can’t believe he got away with this after grooming her as a 13-year-old. I remember it well at the time being in the papers but it didn’t seem to have the shock value that it would have today.

Thisismetooaswell · Yesterday 19:54

ApplePumpkin · Yesterday 14:04

I have never understood why given he made those horrible calls to Andrew Sachs with Brand that he wasn't sacked by the BBC. How he is still working?
Those phone calls were pre-recorded and given the green light by BBC production staff. It beggars belief really.

He was sacked

Sweetandsours · Yesterday 19:57

He is so gross, a real creep IMO.
The age gap with his wife completely tracks.

Redbags · Yesterday 20:01

Puppylucky · Yesterday 19:45

If going home with a drunk 15 year old girl was seen as disgusting/ dodgy at the time - as it should have been - why is calling out that behaviour in front of DWs peers "good natured and bantery"

Exactly, of course it shouldn't be but that's how it was treated.

Puppylucky · Yesterday 20:12

So are you saying @Redbags that even if it was a genuine attempt by JR to call out David W it wasn't taken seriously? Which is very different from accusing him of colluding with the bad behaviour.

HairyToity · Yesterday 20:14

I'd always had Brand and Walliams down as creeps, Ross I have down as an idiot rather than creep.

Redbags · Yesterday 20:17

Puppylucky · Yesterday 20:12

So are you saying @Redbags that even if it was a genuine attempt by JR to call out David W it wasn't taken seriously? Which is very different from accusing him of colluding with the bad behaviour.

I'm saying it likely shows he was aware and if he was he should have reported it properly rather than making it a laughing matter.

NewMonsteraLeaf · Yesterday 20:21

Firesidechatter · Yesterday 13:57

I’m not sure you can make him guilty by association, and back when him and Jane got together, this age gap was common and not frowned on.

I don’t think this is true.

YourAmplePlumPoster · Yesterday 20:23

Jane is incredibly accomplished in her own right as a screen writer, film producer and author. She met JR when she was writing for a music magazine. She chose him and they have stayed together apart from a brief separation. And yet you are intent on painting her as a victim just because she was 16 when she met him in his mid 20s. What does this say about attitudes to young women now? Are they all victims who can only go out with a chaperone as in Victorian days?

JenniferBooth · Yesterday 20:42

There is an episode of 2 point 4 children where Jimmy Saviles radio show is mentioned
Jennys line was "i dont want him coming into my bedroom thankyou Obviously meaning over the radio but there was ambiguity there.
Some were using public mediums to sound warnings

YourAmplePlumPoster · Yesterday 20:51

No idea what this previous post is supposed to be about. The only thing I know is that Jane Goldman left school at 15 and forged an incredibly successful career for herself and married JR at 18 and hasn't claimed any complaints about being abused, vulnerable or powerless. Believe it or not, there are still women around who manage to do that. The only people I see working in my local shops and restaurants are young migrants who presumably don't feel abused, vulnerable and powerless and can't work. This country would probably collapse without the

YourAmplePlumPoster · Yesterday 20:52

Them was my last sentence.

Swipe left for the next trending thread