Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Jonathan Ross

133 replies

Undahpressurah · Today 13:49

Is he next?

thought this could be a good place to discuss his ‘jokes’ about a 15 year old going home with Walliams. He clearly knew far more about Brand and Walliams than he let on.

Repulsive.

OP posts:
Redbags · Today 16:01

Willwetalk · Today 15:55

People have suggested he’s guilty by association. They were also posts here yesterday about Noel Fielding. As I said, I can’t stand Ross although I do like Fielding and if either of them are found to be guilty of a crime, put them away - I wouldn’t give a shit about them. I don’t like people casting aspersions at people because they don’t like them, or they’re weird’. There are people who make my skin crawl; it doesn’t make them perverts.

I don't think guilty by association but questioning what they must have known about the people they associate with.

trapdooragain · Today 16:01

Redbags · Today 15:34

The idea that a 16yo being with a 26yo was normal in those days is absolutely bonkers. I am exactly the same age as his wife. I went on one "date", as a 16yo with a man of 24. My Dad went absolutely wild and the man's friends told them what they thought of him too.

The Mandy Smith thing got a lot of publicity precisely because it was so weird...and becuase her Mother courted publicity. She later married Wyman's son. The whole things was very messed, up and that's what people thought at the time. It sold newspapers is the reason it got publicity, precisely because no-one thought it was normal.

You were lucky my mom encouraged me to date older men as I was immature she thought they would mature me faster again i was 16

ThatFinchWhoForgotHerLogin · Today 16:01

I recall him making a ‘joke’ about implying he’d had sex/anal sex with his wife while she was unconscious due to medication. Bleugh

Sartre · Today 16:03

Redbags · Today 15:00

I saw that, and at the time thought it was a jibe at the unattractive Brydon and Mitchell.

I actually thought that was a really entertaining show at the time. I clearly remember watching it with DH and enjoyed the nonsense of Brand and Fielding, which is shocking to me now.

Edited

It was an incredibly funny show at the time and I also don’t think Ross came across poorly in that particular skit. He was indeed having a jibe at the other four men there - two more sexually appealing than the other two who are clearly “sexless” dowdy sorts. Obviously Lily looked incredibly uncomfortable throughout which is important.

I’m not defending Ross on the whole, he has selected interesting company over the years shall we say. I hope nothing comes out about Noel Fielding.

zanahoria · Today 16:04

TheignT · Today 15:18

That was more extreme. She was 14 when they started dating and he was a lot older than 24. I don't know how he got away with that it definitely sent the wrong message.

I know how he got away with it. Mandy Smith wrote about it in her book. Wyman got the Rolling Stones lawyers to threaten Mandy Smith's mum that if Wyman got sent down they would make sure she did too for child neglect. I doubt it would have happened but it was enough to put the frightners on them

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · Today 16:04

Redbags · Today 16:01

I don't think guilty by association but questioning what they must have known about the people they associate with.

A previous work colleague used to regularly drink in the same pub with Fred West. He must have known what he was really like.

Additup · Today 16:06

Redbags · Today 15:26

No, you absolutely don't need solid evidence. If you have any concerns, especially about the treatment of children, it is your duty to report. You don't need evidence to report it, that's what the subsequent investigation is for.

But there is no evidence either RB or Noel Fielding have ever had a sexual interest in children.

Redbags · Today 16:06

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · Today 16:04

A previous work colleague used to regularly drink in the same pub with Fred West. He must have known what he was really like.

Did he joke very publicly about West burying young people under the patio, you know like Ross did about 15yos going home with Walliams?

disorganisedcrow · Today 16:06

ffoffpls · Today 14:21

He's just so gross. He says here "I was just backstage at THE URINAL chatting to Miranda Hart". That's so nasty, cruel and denigrating of women - implying that a noted and successful comedic actress and writer is a man in drag just because she is tall. She just laughs along no doubt to show she can take a joke. One minute in here:

The whole thing is pretty unpleasant so called comedy mainly insulting people just after he makes another supposed joke denigrating women (Saying they in their finery they all look like "the one you'd definitely sleep with on the apprentice") at about 2:50 Patricia Hodge is in the centre of the table looking very unamused.

That is so disgusting!! What an absolute nasty idiot Jobathan Ross is.

I’m not in the UK but just watched Traitors, and what a genuine and nice person Miranda Hart seems to be.

BeaRightThere · Today 16:07

Undahpressurah · Today 14:25

Why should we give him the benefit of the doubt?

That wise old mumsnet saying of ‘when someone tells you who they are, believe them’ would serve us well here.

Sure, I’m not saying he should be locked up (at least not without a thorough investigation and a fair trial) but do we have to suffer these rich and powerful men being given extremely well paid jobs? Can we just…stop enabling them by showering them with money and fame? When will they be held accountable?

What do you want him to be held accountable for? Having told jokes that are distasteful? Being friendly with two very famous men who turned out to be creeps? What about all his friends who haven't turned out to be creeps?

LastChristmasI · Today 16:08

I agree op.
He clearly knew a lot.
He was in a position of power.
Yet he gave these sleazy rapey men a platform instead of using his power for good

honeybeetheoneandonly · Today 16:33

I quite liked that Johnathan made those jokes. Brand and Williams were open secrets in the industry but very untouchable. They may have been shit jokes but it still drew attention to the fact RB/DW couldn't be trusted around women/girls. JR could have very easily not said anything and toe'd the line. Nobody else seemed to say it out loud. Can't get much closer to calling them out without calling them out. I can think of very few male celebrities who openly called them out.

ByKindOpalPoet · Today 16:36

MeowDoku · Today 15:41

You can't seriously be that rude

How was that rude? It wasn’t

i pointed out something you clearly couldn’t handle

the fact is there is a difference between your parents at 20 and 30 and JR and his wife at 16 and 26.

the fact that you can’t see that is on you

And yes using it was different times is a sick excuse

it wasn’t different times at all, it wasn’t acceptable for a 16 year old and 26 year old then just like it isn’t now

KidsDoBetter · Today 16:36

Redbags · Today 16:06

Did he joke very publicly about West burying young people under the patio, you know like Ross did about 15yos going home with Walliams?

Touché !!

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · Today 16:36

Redbags · Today 16:06

Did he joke very publicly about West burying young people under the patio, you know like Ross did about 15yos going home with Walliams?

I don't know - maybe he did, but who would have taken it seriously at the time? I recall lots of people making jokes about "burying X under the patio" when that same storyline was happening in Brookside decades ago.

My point is there is a often a jump to say "they must have known" about X or Y or Z and that "everyone is responsible" when there will have been people who worked with X or Y or Z who genuinely saw or heard nothing untoward. Guilt by association isn't always fair. Many rapist's or murderer's wives are totally shocked to discover the truth, after all.

None of which means Ross and others aren't a sleaze.

MeowDoku · Today 16:49

ByKindOpalPoet · Today 16:36

How was that rude? It wasn’t

i pointed out something you clearly couldn’t handle

the fact is there is a difference between your parents at 20 and 30 and JR and his wife at 16 and 26.

the fact that you can’t see that is on you

And yes using it was different times is a sick excuse

it wasn’t different times at all, it wasn’t acceptable for a 16 year old and 26 year old then just like it isn’t now

You disagree with me, that's fine. You started your post by calling me thick. That's rude.

ETA I see it's now been deleted! Not at my request, I'm happy for people to see how you engage with others.

ByKindOpalPoet · Today 16:52

MeowDoku · Today 16:49

You disagree with me, that's fine. You started your post by calling me thick. That's rude.

ETA I see it's now been deleted! Not at my request, I'm happy for people to see how you engage with others.

Edited

Because you have to be thick to not understand the fact that there is a difference between a 20 year old and a 30 year old who are both adults compared to a 16 year old and a 26 year old where one is a child by law and one is an adult

Redbags · Today 16:53

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · Today 16:36

I don't know - maybe he did, but who would have taken it seriously at the time? I recall lots of people making jokes about "burying X under the patio" when that same storyline was happening in Brookside decades ago.

My point is there is a often a jump to say "they must have known" about X or Y or Z and that "everyone is responsible" when there will have been people who worked with X or Y or Z who genuinely saw or heard nothing untoward. Guilt by association isn't always fair. Many rapist's or murderer's wives are totally shocked to discover the truth, after all.

None of which means Ross and others aren't a sleaze.

I'm sure there are people who worked with Walliams and saw nothing untoward, we know Jonathan Ross (and his script writer) wasn't one of them because he told us.

And whilst it may well be that lots of people couldn't have spoken up, Jonathan Ross was absolutely someone who could have used his position to do so.

Puppylucky · Today 16:53

ffoffpls · Today 14:02

I have never understood why given he made those horrible calls to Andrew Sachs with Brand that he wasn't sacked by the BBC. How he is still working?

Jonathan Ross is revolting. He has that sort of sleasy air about him - I can't quite put my finger on why but there is something a bit vile there. Maybe it's because he gives an impression of thinking he's ultra actractive to women when he obviously isn't. Or on his chat show sometimes laughs along an inappropriate jokes.

Like this when Aisling Bea takes on an inappropriate question and runs with it to make them all uncomfortable. Romesh Ranganthan also not impressed with Ross. It's grotesque.

Seriously I am not seeing what you think you are seeing. The Only Fans question was a joke which was asked of all three guests and Aisling Bea clearly used it as a jumping off point for a little routine (which she had probably written pre the show). No one was disgusted or offended and it wasn't sleazy. Hate the man if you want but stop lying about things you think he has done.

Additup · Today 16:59

Whether marrying a 16 year old is moral or not it is completely legal in the UK for 16 year olds to have sex and marry. Yes it can be sleazy but there is nothing illegal about it unless the older person is in a position of responsibility eg teacher.

BattFace · Today 17:03

I’ve posted this on a couple of previous threads and I’ll preface it by saying it’s very obvious anecdotal and well … gossip?

I worked for a media company years ago. In London. I can remember a time when one of our journalists went to JRs house, no idea why now. Linked to parties he would throw but I honestly can’t recall the details

anyway he came back to the office FULL of stories about JR but what stuck with us all was the tale of snuff movies that JR apparently had. I’m sure he wasn’t openly watching them or anything like that and err aren’t they an urban myth? - but regardless, I’ve heard from what I’d say is a reliable source , a link between JR and really gross content

again, will end by saying it’s just something I was told and annoyingly I can’t fill in further details but JR next?

probably

Aluna · Today 17:09

Sartre · Today 16:03

It was an incredibly funny show at the time and I also don’t think Ross came across poorly in that particular skit. He was indeed having a jibe at the other four men there - two more sexually appealing than the other two who are clearly “sexless” dowdy sorts. Obviously Lily looked incredibly uncomfortable throughout which is important.

I’m not defending Ross on the whole, he has selected interesting company over the years shall we say. I hope nothing comes out about Noel Fielding.

More sexually appealing? NF and RB?? 😝

Aluna · Today 17:12

Additup · Today 16:59

Whether marrying a 16 year old is moral or not it is completely legal in the UK for 16 year olds to have sex and marry. Yes it can be sleazy but there is nothing illegal about it unless the older person is in a position of responsibility eg teacher.

In England you need parental consent to marry at 16 which is why people went over the border to elope at Gretna Green where you don’t.

Redbags · Today 17:25

Aluna · Today 17:12

In England you need parental consent to marry at 16 which is why people went over the border to elope at Gretna Green where you don’t.

You haven't been able to marry at 16, with or without parental consent, in England and Wales since 2023.

researchers3 · Today 17:26

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · Today 14:22

He's already stated he didn't write the script. Most award presenters don't, they just read it.

Whether he could have refused to say it is another matter.

Oh come off it. It's clearly written for his persona, based on who he is.

He's a massive creep, never got the hype.

Swipe left for the next trending thread