Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

David Walliams

561 replies

mrpenny · Yesterday 12:16

To Think it could not have been DW??

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Bloozie · Yesterday 19:37

CoffeeCantata · Yesterday 18:00

This is what I think.

It’s not so much due to its time - I didn’t watch LB when it went out. I’ve seen bits since then and what struck me wasn’t so much racism, sexism and misogyny (although they’re all there) as the nastiness of the sketches. Beyond the dated attitudes, I found it just left a nasty taste in my mouth. It makes sense now we know what a vile person DW is.

I can't stand cruel humour. It's a form of bullying.

Sartre · Yesterday 19:38

Sladuf1 · Yesterday 13:27

Must be taking tips from Huw Edwards on that score.

Wouldn’t be at all surprised, if this ends up going to trial, if we’ll see a similar outcome to that case. The reported judge’s comments when sentencing Edwards making reference to “mental health” seemed to me to be a classic example of hoodwinking.
It does a disservice to people who are genuinely unwell. Naturally your mental health is going to take a hit in a situation such as that which Walliams found himself. Doesn’t mean he has an actual mental health condition.

Let’s not forget the fact he went down the mental health route when he was removed from BGT as well. It appears to be a running theme with him when things go wrong. He thinks if he threatens to kill himself, people will leave him alone.

I hope schools remove his shit books. He only had one decent story anyway, Gangsta Granny. He was a Temu Roald Dahl.

Bloozie · Yesterday 19:38

ohyesiseethatnow · Yesterday 18:20

The Guardian article is not behind a paywall. You can read it.

Thanks for the heads up - I've been getting 'you reached the limit of your free articles' messages and assumed I'd get the same if I tried.

Sartre · Yesterday 19:39

CoffeeCantata · Yesterday 18:28

Actually- and I’m not just saying this - I always liked Matt. Somehow he didn’t give off the nasty vibes I got from DW. I know that sounds suspicious now!

I did enjoy the Vicki Pollard on trial in Thailand sketch with Dawn French as her mother. I probably shouldn’t have, but I did!

It doesn’t sound suspicious at all. I do not get those vibes from Matt whatsoever. I’m worried about Noel Fielding who I’ve always liked.

Bloozie · Yesterday 19:40

Firesidechatter · Yesterday 17:39

It’s not a paid site, anyone can read rhe guardian on line, just google.

I realise this now. You get 20 free articles a month if you're not a supporter or subscriber, and Ive reached my limit this month already so assumed the article would be swept up in that, but I CAN read it.

ohyesiseethatnow · Yesterday 19:45

DarkAngel23 · Yesterday 19:35

Does that really matter? He was a grown man, who positioned himself as a trusted adult to groom and sexually assaulted a minor. He wasn’t a 16 yr old boy having a sexual encounter with his close in age girlfriend.

It’s comments like these that make me know that I can never report the older man who drugged and manipulated me into sex at the same age.

He didn’t position himself as a trusted adult though.

He’s a celebrity. He wasn’t in a position of trust. He owed them nothing.

He was a man in his 30s who liked younger girls. Tale as old as time. By all accounts he was very much looking for a relationship.

Alex was as 17 and a half and told him she was 18.

The photographer girl was 18/19 when they met.

The models he was so keen on were generally early 20s, one of whom he married and had a child with.

He would try to chat up young girls, he work try to impress them, they would say no and that was that.

When I was 18 I was living in a house share opposite end of the county from my parents and having an amazing time. I don’t understand the need the infantilise these women.

I feel that the hype surrounding this and the “open secret” for so long has got people frothing at the mouth when there’s really only one issue here and it’s the 15 year old.

I can’t understand the relevance of the rest of it.

BadBadCat · Yesterday 19:50

David Walliams is obviously sleazy but Little Britain was huge in the early 2000s and it was hilarious! I was in my 20s and we all knew the catchphrases, they had high profile celebrity guests, and I never heard much complaint about people being offended. They targeted stereotypes from all walks of life not one in particular and it was the near the knuckle humour that made it funny! Comedy has to be risky for it to be actually funny! I thought the whole point of portraying people as such stereotypes is what makes them seem ridiculous, rather than reinforcing them?

It's interesting that Matt Lucas seems immune from the criticism surrounding Little Britain.

Sartre · Yesterday 19:50

ohyesiseethatnow · Yesterday 19:45

He didn’t position himself as a trusted adult though.

He’s a celebrity. He wasn’t in a position of trust. He owed them nothing.

He was a man in his 30s who liked younger girls. Tale as old as time. By all accounts he was very much looking for a relationship.

Alex was as 17 and a half and told him she was 18.

The photographer girl was 18/19 when they met.

The models he was so keen on were generally early 20s, one of whom he married and had a child with.

He would try to chat up young girls, he work try to impress them, they would say no and that was that.

When I was 18 I was living in a house share opposite end of the county from my parents and having an amazing time. I don’t understand the need the infantilise these women.

I feel that the hype surrounding this and the “open secret” for so long has got people frothing at the mouth when there’s really only one issue here and it’s the 15 year old.

I can’t understand the relevance of the rest of it.

And the 15 year olds…? He sucked one of their breasts and wanted it to go further but she stopped, when she was 15! He additionally asked for sexual images from another 15 year old. On top of this, he groomed numerous other teenage girls including the very drunken one in the expensive spa who only didn’t get raped by him because her friend stopped it. Did you ignore all of this?

DarkAngel23 · Yesterday 19:56

ohyesiseethatnow · Yesterday 19:45

He didn’t position himself as a trusted adult though.

He’s a celebrity. He wasn’t in a position of trust. He owed them nothing.

He was a man in his 30s who liked younger girls. Tale as old as time. By all accounts he was very much looking for a relationship.

Alex was as 17 and a half and told him she was 18.

The photographer girl was 18/19 when they met.

The models he was so keen on were generally early 20s, one of whom he married and had a child with.

He would try to chat up young girls, he work try to impress them, they would say no and that was that.

When I was 18 I was living in a house share opposite end of the county from my parents and having an amazing time. I don’t understand the need the infantilise these women.

I feel that the hype surrounding this and the “open secret” for so long has got people frothing at the mouth when there’s really only one issue here and it’s the 15 year old.

I can’t understand the relevance of the rest of it.

He used his fame to groom and sexually assault a 15 yr old. You dont need to be in an ‘official’ position of trust to be a groomer. He messaged another 15 yr old, making her feel ‘special’ and was having sex when she was 17. There’s clearly a pattern here.

sunnybaros · Yesterday 19:57

stripes416 · Yesterday 12:32

I say this all the time! I don’t want it to sound like I’m saying all men are the same because obviously they’re not, but WHY do so many males as soon as they get power and money act like this?? It’s so terrifying to think of what so many men will do when they believe they can get away with it due to their status

Not always famous men though, just look at the case of Giselle Pelicot.

EmotionalSupportCuttlefish · Yesterday 20:00

Bobbieiris · Yesterday 14:37

Urgh why are some men so creepy? I remember when I was 16 and working at next I got a lot of inappropriate comments and touching from a man in his 40s. At the time I thought it was just another gross man to ignore and brush off but looking back it's just disgusting

Same. I was SA'ed by my first boss. I was seventeen, turning 18 a week into the job. He was 34. I only had to stay there a year for a training position and by the time I left I was a wreck. I had a mouth full of ulcers and couldn't digest my food. He harassed me the whole time I was there. I was supposed to then go to uni to study the subject but I deferred it for a year and then another year as, by then, I wasn't even sure I wanted to do the subject and I was a shadow of myself. I eventually qualified but he properly messed me up. I wasn't even raped. I can't imagine what state I would have been in if he had done. Unwanted sexual attention of any sort is so destructive.

MissHarlott · Yesterday 20:12

Freemefromic · Yesterday 12:26

Here we go then! Another predator to be investigated.

Little Britain is no longer available on BBC iPlayer. So Walliams will immediately lose any repeat royalties. Sadly so will Matt Lucas who is an innocent party in all of this. It would not surprise me if one of Russell Brand's co-conspiritors in the 'Sachgate' incident eventually gets their collar felt. There are a lot of sleazebags out there in the world of showbusiness and celebritydom.

nomas · Yesterday 20:13

It’s crazy how Britain’s Got Talent has become like Jim’ll Fix it.

The industry said lessons had been learnt after Jimmy Savile but here we are again with David Walliams.

There is something rotten at the core of the TV industry which is still male dominated.

the80sweregreat · Yesterday 20:15

nomas · Yesterday 20:13

It’s crazy how Britain’s Got Talent has become like Jim’ll Fix it.

The industry said lessons had been learnt after Jimmy Savile but here we are again with David Walliams.

There is something rotten at the core of the TV industry which is still male dominated.

Edited

I agree. People enabled all this.
All for money.

nomas · Yesterday 20:15

MissHarlott · Yesterday 20:12

Little Britain is no longer available on BBC iPlayer. So Walliams will immediately lose any repeat royalties. Sadly so will Matt Lucas who is an innocent party in all of this. It would not surprise me if one of Russell Brand's co-conspiritors in the 'Sachgate' incident eventually gets their collar felt. There are a lot of sleazebags out there in the world of showbusiness and celebritydom.

Matt Lucas laughing along at the joke about Walliams sleeping with 15 year girls was pretty grotesque.

They all knew he was hiding in plain sight.

Thecows · Yesterday 20:18

Matt Lucas ok ?

MissHarlott · Yesterday 20:20

nomas · Yesterday 20:15

Matt Lucas laughing along at the joke about Walliams sleeping with 15 year girls was pretty grotesque.

They all knew he was hiding in plain sight.

A lot of people will laugh even though they do not find it amusing because they don't want to appear the odd one out. I've done it myself in the past, but you are quite right.

percypigss · Yesterday 20:23

ThatRedFish · Yesterday 17:18

I’ve always refused to buy his books, I never understood the appeal. They’re literal junk/ twaddle. They seem popular with the kids who watch a lot of junk usually online…..! Our primary school also got rid of them a few years ago, I assumed it was because they’re awful…. When things like this come to light, you wonder if so many people knew but didn’t report …. I’d like to think removed because the books are absolute crap.

How judgmental are you! Kids can have enjoyed his books without it meaning they watched a load of junk online.

BigSuse · Yesterday 20:23

Up until very recently it was just accepted that girls and women would be subject to inappropriate comments and touching at work, and in general, I’ve lost count of the times it happened to me and was minimised by various bosses, my parents and other people, I was constantly told I needed to get a thicker skin, I’m glad things are changing now and it’s not acceptable any more.

Arran2024 · Yesterday 20:25

Bloozie · Yesterday 19:38

Thanks for the heads up - I've been getting 'you reached the limit of your free articles' messages and assumed I'd get the same if I tried.

Just go to theguardian.com when you run out of free articles on the app. This is the international version and there is no limit on what you can read.

valentinka31 · Yesterday 20:31

mrpenny · Yesterday 12:16

To Think it could not have been DW??

Have you ever read anything he's written for kids, or looked at his face?
He is utterly repellent.
I literally had to stop reading a book to my daughter and we agreed we would not continue as it was so utterly unpleasant.
Of COURSE it is him.

mrpenny · Yesterday 20:32

valentinka31 · Yesterday 20:31

Have you ever read anything he's written for kids, or looked at his face?
He is utterly repellent.
I literally had to stop reading a book to my daughter and we agreed we would not continue as it was so utterly unpleasant.
Of COURSE it is him.

ANother one who missed the point….

OP posts:
Koalacanth · Yesterday 20:35

MissHarlott · Yesterday 20:12

Little Britain is no longer available on BBC iPlayer. So Walliams will immediately lose any repeat royalties. Sadly so will Matt Lucas who is an innocent party in all of this. It would not surprise me if one of Russell Brand's co-conspiritors in the 'Sachgate' incident eventually gets their collar felt. There are a lot of sleazebags out there in the world of showbusiness and celebritydom.

It was a very overrated show anyway.

TiredCatLady · Yesterday 20:35

ODFO OP

Stop it with the stupid caps and cryptic shite. Stop apologising for horrible fuckers and trying to divert attention.

nomas · Yesterday 20:38

mrpenny · Yesterday 20:32

ANother one who missed the point….

You don’t have a point. You haven’t made a single point.

Swipe left for the next trending thread