I don't understand this obsession with her being forced into court. I used to be a criminal defence solicitor. It's not uncommon for defendants to refuse to come up to court, and everyone just rolls their eyes and gets on with it. There's no actual practical need for them to be there. If they miss hearing the evidence, that's their problem. If they miss the opportunity to give evidence, again, their problem. If they refuse to come up in order to enter a plea, the judge will assume a not guilty plea and proceed accordingly. It's a courtroom, not an episode of Jeremy Kyle.
She's going to prison for the rest of her life. That's the punishment. The calls for her to be dragged in, kicking and screaming, are just about the public feeling entitled to see her 'suffer.' It's just about the spectacle.
There are circumstances within the criminal justice process when it's necessary for force to be used to move a suspect or defendant - arresting someone, getting them out of the van and into the police station, taking them out of court and down to a cell if they're kicking off, moving them within the prison system. It's avoided where possible, because of the risk to everyone involved, and because it creates a hostile, aggressive environment which is of benefit to nobody. If someone is forced into court, you have no control over what they do or say. You could have security officers injured or having to hang onto a fighting prisoner throughout a lengthy hearing - because we don't do strait jackets and leg chains, disappointing though that might be for some people. You could have families of victims subjected to abuse and deliberate provocation - because we don't gag prisoners. You could have the court hearing disrupted to the point where it takes three times as long. And it makes everything about the perpetrator and their showboating, rather than about some sort of justice for the victims and their families.
With a case like this, it's particularly vital that the families are supported to give their victim impact statements, if they choose to do so, with as much sensitivity and calm as possible. No matter how much they might hate Lucy Letby, it's unlikely they'd find much solace in listening to her screaming or wailing while security staff pin her down.
Let the court get on with doing what they do, whether or not she engages with it. We've moved on a bit from sticking prisoners in the stocks and throwing rotten vegetables at them, or letting people into prisons to stare at the inmates. Also, it's not about what the public wants to see - it's about the families, and the process. She's been splashed all over the papers, and her name will be remembered for decades. No one will ever remember the names of her victims or their families. Wouldn't it be better to just ignore what she does, and let her be sentenced and taken away without anyone laying eyes on her or giving her a moment's more attention?