Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Liberal Democrats are voting to scrap the EHRC guidance

40 replies

MyPearlViper · Yesterday 13:24

Once again Ed Davey shows he is no friend to women

From his Radio 4 interview this morning:

'The Supreme Court created something that we didn't expect.

'We've been working out how to make sure it's implemented properly and we've been waiting for this guidance – it's taken a long time.

'And we think, talking to businesses, they don't think it's clear enough or helpful enough. So we're responding to what other people are saying.'

Words can't express how angry this makes me. He has no idea how women are feeling, has he?

Please, any Lib Dem women still in the party, do what you can to overturn the vote this afternoon

Liberal Democrats are voting to scrap the EHRC guidance
OP posts:
Lottapianos · Yesterday 13:30

For the love of god. They're just pathetic.

'Restoring trans rights ' 🙄🙄🙄
Would be much more honest to say 'couldnt give a fuck about women's rights'

DialSquare · Yesterday 13:32

I wish someone would tell us which rights Trans people don’t have.

MyPearlViper · Yesterday 13:46

"The Supreme Court created something that we didn't expect"

Well no, Ed, it didn't. It clarified that in law (and indeed in the real world) men are men and women are women, and the one cannot magically become the other.

The fact that this was a surprise to Ed and his TRA advisors shows just how complacent those advocates feel - and how valuable the SC announcement truly is

OP posts:
rubyslippers · Yesterday 13:49

MyPearlViper · Yesterday 13:46

"The Supreme Court created something that we didn't expect"

Well no, Ed, it didn't. It clarified that in law (and indeed in the real world) men are men and women are women, and the one cannot magically become the other.

The fact that this was a surprise to Ed and his TRA advisors shows just how complacent those advocates feel - and how valuable the SC announcement truly is

Absolutely!!

yoursweetpotatoesarebland · Yesterday 13:51

It is unbelievable to me that he gave that r4 interview this morning.

The insane thing is that I worry people will vote for him anyway, I have left leaning friends who will not particularly agree with him but don’t really know a lot and dislike the tories so will vote Lib Dem. It’s terrifying, we will end up like Australia.

zanahoria · Yesterday 13:56

Ed did not expect it as he he takes legal advice from Stonewall

I for one was not surprised to find out that the law considers only females to be women.

ElenOfTheWays · Yesterday 14:03

So they wish to change the law to give a small cohort of people privileges that no one else has because...?

Vote Lib Dem ladies if you want to vote your rights away.

Fortunately I think both the LDs and the Greens will eventually disappear up their own arses in a shower of cognitive dissonance.
We can only hope

murasaki · Yesterday 14:10

Well they can vote as they like. As they have no chance of being in power, it's just virtue signalling stupidity, which is exactly what I expect from them.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 14:17

A left coalition is very concerning.

Shedmistress · Yesterday 14:19

They were given money from a company that makes puberty blockers.

At that moment they changed course and its probably in the small print that they have to keep on and on about this forever.

Arran2024 · Yesterday 14:29

yoursweetpotatoesarebland · Yesterday 13:51

It is unbelievable to me that he gave that r4 interview this morning.

The insane thing is that I worry people will vote for him anyway, I have left leaning friends who will not particularly agree with him but don’t really know a lot and dislike the tories so will vote Lib Dem. It’s terrifying, we will end up like Australia.

I live in a Lib Dem stronghold. It is interesting to ask friends why they vote Lib Dem - none of them can name any policies!! It just seems an option they can connect with.

MyPearlViper · Yesterday 14:33

Arran2024 · Yesterday 14:29

I live in a Lib Dem stronghold. It is interesting to ask friends why they vote Lib Dem - none of them can name any policies!! It just seems an option they can connect with.

It's a protest vote isn't it. A nice compromise. No-one I know believes me when I point out quite how much the Lib Dems (and the Greens) hate women

OP posts:
Arran2024 · Yesterday 14:36

MyPearlViper · Yesterday 14:33

It's a protest vote isn't it. A nice compromise. No-one I know believes me when I point out quite how much the Lib Dems (and the Greens) hate women

Exactly. And btw there is zero point to having a lib dem mp as no one in gov departments etc cares what they say.

JohnnyMcGrathSaysFuckOff · Yesterday 14:44

I cannot really articulate why, but of all politicians, I really dislike Ed Davey.

As a good centre leftie I shouldn't dislike him as much as say Farage. But I do.

I think it is his smarmy, privileged cluelessness that does it. His cosy certainty that he's a good guy as opposed to yet another bastard male politician.

Does anyone remember his ill-fated MN webchat? Must be years ago now

iwishitwouldstartraining · Yesterday 14:49

I genuinely don't know which is more worrying: that they want to scrap the guidance or that they think that there is a point to scrapping the guidance.

How can people paid to be legislators be so ignorant?

murasaki · Yesterday 14:52

JohnnyMcGrathSaysFuckOff · Yesterday 14:44

I cannot really articulate why, but of all politicians, I really dislike Ed Davey.

As a good centre leftie I shouldn't dislike him as much as say Farage. But I do.

I think it is his smarmy, privileged cluelessness that does it. His cosy certainty that he's a good guy as opposed to yet another bastard male politician.

Does anyone remember his ill-fated MN webchat? Must be years ago now

His whole 'I'm mad , me' shtick really irritates me.

iwishitwouldstartraining · Yesterday 14:53

MyPearlViper · Yesterday 14:33

It's a protest vote isn't it. A nice compromise. No-one I know believes me when I point out quite how much the Lib Dems (and the Greens) hate women

People have been voting Libdem in South West London (Ed Davey and Sarah Olney's patch) for decades. They appeal to people who don't quite want to vote Labour, but think the Conservatives aren't very nice.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 14:55

MyPearlViper · Yesterday 14:33

It's a protest vote isn't it. A nice compromise. No-one I know believes me when I point out quite how much the Lib Dems (and the Greens) hate women

The problem is they could easily be power sharing with Labour next time, and the Greens even. If we go backwards after the SC ruling it’ll be utter shite.

Pingponghavoc · Yesterday 14:56

Ed Davey is a middle class mr blobby running around in theme parks in an attempt to distract from the fact that he's inept and he has no policies.

I'll point out that if TRA dont want to be seen as sexual predators, they could do worse than lobby for something other than men following girls into changing rooms.

ArabellaScott · Yesterday 14:57

EasternStandard · Yesterday 14:17

A left coalition is very concerning.

Yes, indeed.

AdeleRochester · Yesterday 14:58

I stopped voting Lib Dem when Lynne Featherstone announced that the party didn’t want my vote.

Ed Davey has done nothing to make me revise my policy.

ArabellaScott · Yesterday 14:59

Pingponghavoc · Yesterday 14:56

Ed Davey is a middle class mr blobby running around in theme parks in an attempt to distract from the fact that he's inept and he has no policies.

I'll point out that if TRA dont want to be seen as sexual predators, they could do worse than lobby for something other than men following girls into changing rooms.

Davey had some decent policies on care. Probably because he has a personal interest in the subject.

But it's really sad to see how the rest of the party has just disintegrated and gone all to shit on these issues.

PronounssheRa · Yesterday 15:01

God, politics and politicians in this country are so painfully dim.

This isn't about guidance, it's about the law of this country. A silly little vote by a party of no consequence cant change that.

It does however give me real insight into which party's not to vote for.

If they want to change the law to lessen womens rights, let's have it out there in an open and transparent way. The Denton playbook doesn't work anymore.

iwishitwouldstartraining · Yesterday 15:02

It's just so brainless.

There is nothing in the Equality Act or the guidance that prevents unisex provision (whether or not anyone on this board would support it). The only thing you definitely can't do is create a service for women and then allow men to use it, because then it is no longer a service for women. This is not discrimination. It's just how logic and the material world work.

The Equality Act specifically says that people covered by the PC of gender reassignment must have provision, and if ED and SO genuinely cared about this they would be campaigning for more unisex provision. But they don't, so they come up with platitudes without bothering to engage.