GLP are going after Sarah Phillimore and are going to lose - Part Two

[fromorbit]

The Story so Far

Part 1

The first thread
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5400132-glp-are-going-after-sarah-philmore-and-are-going-to-lose?page=1

Get the popcorn folks. GLP is getting ready to lose again.

They are going after barrister Sarah Phillimore for referring to a man as a man. They think they are going to lawfare her into silence.

Her blog:
Here we are now: Entertain us
I have had now 7 years and counting of the various tactics used to 'silence' those who won't comply with prevailing orthodoxy. How are those tactics holding up?
https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/here-we-are-now-entertain-us?

The only thing is other TAs have already tried this on Phillimore multiple times.

They went to the Bar Council their claims were dismissed. They all failed. More to the point this ‘Kate’ is the same guy complaining again who already failed. Sarah Phillimore knows the law and likes explaining it to TAs and making them lose. So she doesn't even resent the attempt.

As Sarah has stated "They pick on someone who not only enjoys this but has now a vast repository of knowledge about the law in this area."

Part 2

So the Fox Basher decided to tell massive lies about Sarah Phillimore now he faces a defamation action.

GLP's case against Sarah rested on evidence from "Kate" and this turned out to be the infamous man in a dress Sophie Sparkles. A guy who was too obnoxious, chaotic and threatening even for the Scottish Greens to tolerate. Even for someone as incompetent as the Fox Basher this plan seemed particularly bad.

A band of helpful gardeners assembled and planted a lot of seeds and soon Sarah's garden was blooming.

Sarah assembled a huge dossier of evidence about Sparkles showing his instability. She carefully built up her case using her excellent legal skills.

After giving the Fox Basher plenty of time to apologise Sarah took action for defamation in December and her blog outlines the story so far nicely:

Letter before Action
I publish here my letter to Jolyon Maugham. There is no freedom of speech to tell harmful lies about others.

For the background to all of this, please see my response to the complaint of the Good Law Project which they made to the Bar Standards Board on August 26 2025. Shortly after this complaint, Mr Maugham chose to assert to his many followers online that I had ‘led a campaign of harassment’ so wicked that it led a trans identifying man to attempt suicide. I deal with that claim at some length in my response. It is not true.

I asked via email on 30 August 2025 for Maugham to delete, apologise and make a donation of £5K to For Women Scotland. His refusal came a few days later in a series of videos posted to TikTok and Instagram where he was clearly excited about the (false) idea that JK Rowling would be joining me in legal action against him. Being able to tell his followers that he faced attack by the Nasty Billionaire Transphobe would clearly have more cachet and would attract more funds to the Good Law Project than a much less sexy tussle with a junior provincial barrister.

I am sorry to disappoint Mr Maugham. It’s just me. Well me, and the so far 990 very generous people who have helped me raise the money to be able to even contemplate this kind of legal action. My grateful thanks to every one of them. I do not think that anyone has ‘freedom of speech’ to tell harmful lies about another person and certainly not a senior member of a regulated profession, who will rely on his status to give his words power and cause harm.

https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/letter-before-action

Now the Bar Standards Board has decided that Sarah has no case to answer and released a letter explaining how the GLP had failed again. Details here:

Right Here. Right Now.

Another stunning technical victory for the Good Law Project shows that sanity is being restored to the public debate about gender identity, slowly but ever so surely.

On 27 March 2026 I received the welcome and to be honest not entirely expected news that the Bar Standards Board was not going to investigate further the complaint of the Good Law Project against me on behalf of trans identifying man Euan Weddell, aka Sophie Molly/Sparkles.

https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/right-here-right-now

GLP are planning to release a statement which will no doubt spin what has happened as much as possible in its usual style.

Will the Fox Basher's long history of misogynistic hatred for any women who has knowledge about biology and legal incompetence come back to haunt him again?

If he is defeated it will be a warning to all TAs that this type of bigotry and massive lies are not going to be accepted legally in a country where women and men are legally equal.

Whatever happen's Sarah's bravery once again will pay a significant part in restoring a world in which discussing the reality of the existence of male and female human beings is accepted.

Her garden still needs more plants, and harvest so far has been excellent and you can keep watching this thread for more proof of that.

Garden now at 44,857 seeds up about 1500 from a few days ago.

I suspect if the case goes further it will be picked up by media like Telegraph, Mail etc. Reports on the Fox Killer makes for entertaining stories. This should increase support for Sarah, I imagine reports would have to pretty neutral though for legal reasons.

Jolyon Maugham has now adopted Bash Back as the paramilitary wing of the Good Law Project. Just when you thought this couldn’t get any crazier. Interesting to see Mumsnet identified that image as ‘sensitive’.

I can see the image is ‘under review’ - it’s the Bash Back cartoon of a man in a balaclava welding a hammer. Maugham has posted on Bluesky that this is a legitimate response regarding ‘trans rights’. I guess it is no mystery why men like Aida P think it’s ok to talk of splintery rolling pins.

They are working themselves up into a righteous tizzy.

While we can approach this in either an amused "look what idiocy JM has adopted now" or a "look how these guys are pathetically trying to edge terrorism", sooner or later one of these addle-pated, deranged fuckwits will cross from SM to the real world and some poor woman will be seriously harmed.

BB and JM's support for them is not acceptable.

100% agree. He's inciting violence.

Crikey! Just when you think you've seen it all.

I hate stereotypes, but it’s all just so … male, isn’t it?

”I’m going to keep being violent until you finally agree I’m female.” There’s so much testosterone floating around.

It's fine though, because he calls it non-violence.

Unlike words, which are literal violence in Upside-Down World.

Oh my word. This organisation which describes itself as a ‘non violent’ organisation but has a poster image of a balaclava clad man wielding a hammer. Those two things don’t really line up. Is their poster designer high?

Coincidentally Aida P was the first person to repost JMs message less than 4 minutes after it dropped. It was almost like Aida was expecting it?

Yes, surely that doesn’t reach the BSB standards that JM should be subjected to?

Although did I read that he’s not a proper barrister any more?

Does JM fall under the ambit of the BSB? Considering the robust way they dealt with Sarah P's case, I can't imagine they'd have much time for him.

Bit confused here, JM signs off his verbiage with the Spanish Civil War slogan '¡No pasarán!'

Roughly translated this means 'They shall not pass'

I thought that the whole point was that they do pass and no one can tell the difference

Arf! 😁But of course, it's insulting too; taking a slogan from a war where people were literally risking their lives for something they believed in, coming from someone like him? That they could imagine that they are heroes is pathetic beyond belief.

Where is the laughing reaction when you need it!?
Love this

I don't know why everyone is getting so worked up about the 'cartoon'

Clearly, it's cold outside and the chap in the balaclava is part of a DIY flash-mob that have dropped around to a neighbor's house to help out with home improvements.
One of the other flash-mobbers has already arrived and is beckoning his compatriot in with a friendly 'Join us!'.
Unfortunately all of the structural work is complete and they are on to the decorating so the tool that the new arrival has brought will be of little use.
Embarrassing

Are you Jane Russell in disguise?

What, 40's leading lady Jane Russell? She of 'The Outlaw', 'Gentlemen prefer blondes' and the underwire bra? - Nope, not me

Joke falls flat! Jane Russell KC. Been involved in several cases much followed on MN.

I really struggle with the hubris of people like Aida, who has equal rights with everyone in the UK, suggesting that trans people are oppressed in the same way as citizens of colonised countries. My Irish ancestors were prohibited from purchasing or leasing property in their own country and were not allowed to vote - in the land in which they were born - because of laws made by the British government of the time. To liken these laws with the Equality Act is absurd. To suggest this likeness justifies ‘non peaceful measures’ is indefensible.

It didn't fall flat - and I expect Disbelief did get it.

It's a running gag which helped keep us sane when listening to her interrupt Naomi for the 1000th time in Sandie Peggie.

Erm, even Jolly Old Mawks isn't so epically dim witted that he thinks that promoting violent intimidation is non violent.

Is he... ?

I'm not Jane Russell KC either - I am flattered though.

I've got no idea anymore - I'm coming to the conclusion that JM just lives in a parallel universe