Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

GLP are going after Sarah Phillimore and are going to lose - Part Two

281 replies

fromorbit · 01/04/2026 05:23

The Story so Far

Part 1

The first thread
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5400132-glp-are-going-after-sarah-philmore-and-are-going-to-lose?page=1

Get the popcorn folks. GLP is getting ready to lose again.

They are going after barrister Sarah Phillimore for referring to a man as a man. They think they are going to lawfare her into silence.

Her blog:
Here we are now: Entertain us
I have had now 7 years and counting of the various tactics used to 'silence' those who won't comply with prevailing orthodoxy. How are those tactics holding up?
https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/here-we-are-now-entertain-us?

The only thing is other TAs have already tried this on Phillimore multiple times.

They went to the Bar Council their claims were dismissed. They all failed. More to the point this ‘Kate’ is the same guy complaining again who already failed. Sarah Phillimore knows the law and likes explaining it to TAs and making them lose. So she doesn't even resent the attempt.

As Sarah has stated "They pick on someone who not only enjoys this but has now a vast repository of knowledge about the law in this area."

Part 2

So the Fox Basher decided to tell massive lies about Sarah Phillimore now he faces a defamation action.

GLP's case against Sarah rested on evidence from "Kate" and this turned out to be the infamous man in a dress Sophie Sparkles. A guy who was too obnoxious, chaotic and threatening even for the Scottish Greens to tolerate. Even for someone as incompetent as the Fox Basher this plan seemed particularly bad.

A band of helpful gardeners assembled and planted a lot of seeds and soon Sarah's garden was blooming.

Sarah assembled a huge dossier of evidence about Sparkles showing his instability. She carefully built up her case using her excellent legal skills.

After giving the Fox Basher plenty of time to apologise Sarah took action for defamation in December and her blog outlines the story so far nicely:

Letter before Action
I publish here my letter to Jolyon Maugham. There is no freedom of speech to tell harmful lies about others.

For the background to all of this, please see my response to the complaint of the Good Law Project which they made to the Bar Standards Board on August 26 2025. Shortly after this complaint, Mr Maugham chose to assert to his many followers online that I had ‘led a campaign of harassment’ so wicked that it led a trans identifying man to attempt suicide. I deal with that claim at some length in my response. It is not true.

I asked via email on 30 August 2025 for Maugham to delete, apologise and make a donation of £5K to For Women Scotland. His refusal came a few days later in a series of videos posted to TikTok and Instagram where he was clearly excited about the (false) idea that JK Rowling would be joining me in legal action against him. Being able to tell his followers that he faced attack by the Nasty Billionaire Transphobe would clearly have more cachet and would attract more funds to the Good Law Project than a much less sexy tussle with a junior provincial barrister.

I am sorry to disappoint Mr Maugham. It’s just me. Well me, and the so far 990 very generous people who have helped me raise the money to be able to even contemplate this kind of legal action. My grateful thanks to every one of them. I do not think that anyone has ‘freedom of speech’ to tell harmful lies about another person and certainly not a senior member of a regulated profession, who will rely on his status to give his words power and cause harm.

https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/letter-before-action

Now the Bar Standards Board has decided that Sarah has no case to answer and released a letter explaining how the GLP had failed again. Details here:

Right Here. Right Now.

Another stunning technical victory for the Good Law Project shows that sanity is being restored to the public debate about gender identity, slowly but ever so surely.

On 27 March 2026 I received the welcome and to be honest not entirely expected news that the Bar Standards Board was not going to investigate further the complaint of the Good Law Project against me on behalf of trans identifying man Euan Weddell, aka Sophie Molly/Sparkles.

https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/right-here-right-now

GLP are planning to release a statement which will no doubt spin what has happened as much as possible in its usual style.

Will the Fox Basher's long history of misogynistic hatred for any women who has knowledge about biology and legal incompetence come back to haunt him again?

If he is defeated it will be a warning to all TAs that this type of bigotry and massive lies are not going to be accepted legally in a country where women and men are legally equal.

Whatever happen's Sarah's bravery once again will pay a significant part in restoring a world in which discussing the reality of the existence of male and female human beings is accepted.

Her garden still needs more plants, and harvest so far has been excellent and you can keep watching this thread for more proof of that.

Letter before Action

I publish here my letter to Jolyon Maugham. There is no freedom of speech to tell harmful lies about others.

https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/letter-before-action

OP posts:
Thread gallery
37
ArabellaScott · 01/04/2026 08:04
Salute Saluting GIF

Thanks, orbit.

Chersfrozenface · 01/04/2026 09:25

Any sign of the GLP's statement yet?

I could do with some comedy today.

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 01/04/2026 09:57

You couldn’t make this lot up! When will Jolly FBs funders realise how lost his plot is?

SabrinaThwaite · 01/04/2026 10:08

Sarah’s response to Weddell’s claim to be taking his complaint further:

I remain very happy for this to go further. Let’s get it to the highest court we can. Let’s lance this ideological boil as soon as we can, in a legal fight where I am not liable for any costs!

You wanted this as public as possible to cause harm to my reputation and I assume my mental health. You will get what you wanted re publicity at least.

GLP are going after Sarah Phillimore and are going to lose - Part Two
KnottyAuty · 01/04/2026 10:15

Fabulous summary @fromorbit
🍿

MarjorieWestriding · 01/04/2026 10:17

I can almost hear her thoughts, 'Right mate, you've had it, let's go'.

Iamnotalemming · 01/04/2026 11:26

Brilliant summary @fromorbit
Looking forward to the updates.

QuornPlaster · 01/04/2026 12:37

I do agree with SM - there was a travesty of injustice against a woman.

GreyskySexRealistsky · 01/04/2026 12:45

I really enjoyed that opening summary @fromorbit 👏

BiologicalRobot · 01/04/2026 13:31

Thank you for the new thread. Interesting times ahead! 🍿

DialSquare · 01/04/2026 13:48

They really messed with the wrong woman didn’t they.

RedToothBrush · 01/04/2026 13:50

Man desparate for attention, gets the wrong kind of attention.

lcakethereforeIam · 01/04/2026 14:09
Serious Game Time GIF by Bombay Softwares

So many ,gifs.

SinnerBoy · 01/04/2026 14:54

Sarah's letter is a thing to behold!

Maaate · 01/04/2026 14:59

Sparkles:

GLP are going after Sarah Phillimore and are going to lose - Part Two
DrudgeJedd · 02/04/2026 10:48

Still no update by the GLP to their followers, I'm shocked! This is my shocked face 🤔
Does anyone know how costs are sorted when a crowdfunder is involved? Specifically if Sarah wins her defamation claim against Maugham and he is ordered to pay her costs, is she required to use the crowdfunder funds first & he just makes up any shortfall?
I donated and I wouldn't care but I would prefer that he is financially inconvenienced as much as possible for his unethical behaviour.

DrudgeJedd · 02/04/2026 11:19

Nothing to say about this to his 75000 followers on Bluesky. Promoting books about transgenderism to children under 10yo instead.

GLP are going after Sarah Phillimore and are going to lose - Part Two
fromorbit · 02/04/2026 11:55

Update Sparkles now claims on Bsky to have proof he attempted suicide in 2024 and to have provided GLP with it. Sarah responds asking to see the evidence pointing out inconstancies. It is almost as if Sparkles is a massive LIAR.

Sarah Phillimore
https://nitter.net/SVPhillimore/status/2039631942354600073#m

1h
My solicitors have now written to the Good Law Project to request disclosure of this proof, as was previously requested, it being central to what I assert is Mr Maugham’s defamation of me.

I remain intrigued as to why this attempt was not pleaded in complaints made in 2024.

As both Mr Weddell and the GLP chose to make their attempted trashing of my reputation public, my efforts to defend it will also be public and continuing.

Sarah Phillimore

Interesting. If he was moved to try and kill himself in 2024, why did that not form any part of the complaint he made about me in 2024? That complaint was simply that I ‘moved him to tears’. Nor did he mention it in his request for a review. It was not asserted until August 2025. While I hope that my rising anger and exasperation does not stop me feeling compassion for those so genuinely desperate they can see no other way out, I am not going to tolerate manipulative and false allegations/threats of suicide to shut down legitimate discussion of important issues. My solicitors have asked for this proof. I trust it will now be provided
https://nitter.net/SVPhillimore/status/2039634145324712383#m

OP posts:
Kiminki · 02/04/2026 12:10

fromorbit · 02/04/2026 11:55

Update Sparkles now claims on Bsky to have proof he attempted suicide in 2024 and to have provided GLP with it. Sarah responds asking to see the evidence pointing out inconstancies. It is almost as if Sparkles is a massive LIAR.

Sarah Phillimore
https://nitter.net/SVPhillimore/status/2039631942354600073#m

1h
My solicitors have now written to the Good Law Project to request disclosure of this proof, as was previously requested, it being central to what I assert is Mr Maugham’s defamation of me.

I remain intrigued as to why this attempt was not pleaded in complaints made in 2024.

As both Mr Weddell and the GLP chose to make their attempted trashing of my reputation public, my efforts to defend it will also be public and continuing.

Sarah Phillimore

Interesting. If he was moved to try and kill himself in 2024, why did that not form any part of the complaint he made about me in 2024? That complaint was simply that I ‘moved him to tears’. Nor did he mention it in his request for a review. It was not asserted until August 2025. While I hope that my rising anger and exasperation does not stop me feeling compassion for those so genuinely desperate they can see no other way out, I am not going to tolerate manipulative and false allegations/threats of suicide to shut down legitimate discussion of important issues. My solicitors have asked for this proof. I trust it will now be provided
https://nitter.net/SVPhillimore/status/2039634145324712383#m

A reminder, Stonewall classified partners of trans identified men claiming to be suicidal as abuse towards the trans identified man.

Kiminki · 02/04/2026 12:13

DrudgeJedd · 02/04/2026 10:48

Still no update by the GLP to their followers, I'm shocked! This is my shocked face 🤔
Does anyone know how costs are sorted when a crowdfunder is involved? Specifically if Sarah wins her defamation claim against Maugham and he is ordered to pay her costs, is she required to use the crowdfunder funds first & he just makes up any shortfall?
I donated and I wouldn't care but I would prefer that he is financially inconvenienced as much as possible for his unethical behaviour.

If Maugham was ordered to pay costs (which I don’t think is very common) then he has to pay her costs, or whatever proportion of them he is instructed to pay. Any funding she has from any source only goes towards costs he has not been instructed to pay.

RedToothBrush · 02/04/2026 12:16

fromorbit · 02/04/2026 11:55

Update Sparkles now claims on Bsky to have proof he attempted suicide in 2024 and to have provided GLP with it. Sarah responds asking to see the evidence pointing out inconstancies. It is almost as if Sparkles is a massive LIAR.

Sarah Phillimore
https://nitter.net/SVPhillimore/status/2039631942354600073#m

1h
My solicitors have now written to the Good Law Project to request disclosure of this proof, as was previously requested, it being central to what I assert is Mr Maugham’s defamation of me.

I remain intrigued as to why this attempt was not pleaded in complaints made in 2024.

As both Mr Weddell and the GLP chose to make their attempted trashing of my reputation public, my efforts to defend it will also be public and continuing.

Sarah Phillimore

Interesting. If he was moved to try and kill himself in 2024, why did that not form any part of the complaint he made about me in 2024? That complaint was simply that I ‘moved him to tears’. Nor did he mention it in his request for a review. It was not asserted until August 2025. While I hope that my rising anger and exasperation does not stop me feeling compassion for those so genuinely desperate they can see no other way out, I am not going to tolerate manipulative and false allegations/threats of suicide to shut down legitimate discussion of important issues. My solicitors have asked for this proof. I trust it will now be provided
https://nitter.net/SVPhillimore/status/2039634145324712383#m

Oh haven't we had this one before and it's something Sparkly has claimed with various different people at different times only to turn up next day at a protest or something. The point being that he wouldn't be able to pin it on a single particular person because he's been blanket pissing the accusation. And wasn't it something like too many antihistamines or something which was really laughable in the first place.

I forget the details but it was talked about a while ago about how utterly ridiculous the claim was.

It strikes me as being as valid in terms of proof as getting someone to provide you with a certificate saying you have changed sex tbh.

anyolddinosaur · 02/04/2026 12:35

When the full proceeds of a crowdfunder have not been required for whatever reason they are normally donated to to another similar case. I've seen this happen sometimes when a large donation has appeared in the funding of another case. However the chance of Sarah recovering enough of her costs for this to happen seems pretty low. I have once been offered a refund of a donation - by Sharar Ali. Replied that he could keep it and use it for the next time Greens screwed up or donate to any other similar case of his choosing.

The defendants have tried arguing that crowdfunders should reduce costs in several cases I've seen. Judges have been quite insistent that source of the defendants funds is not relevant, so it wont affect what Maugham is ordered to pay. NHS Fife's barrister tried to find the source of Sandie Peggie's funds and were told the questions would not be answered. As this case never actually came to court I dont think they could have responded with "I refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v Pressdram".

SabrinaThwaite · 02/04/2026 13:03

DrudgeJedd · 02/04/2026 11:19

Nothing to say about this to his 75000 followers on Bluesky. Promoting books about transgenderism to children under 10yo instead.

Off topic, but that’s grim and hideously misogynistic.

Why can’t a girl like football without being transed?

DialSquare · 02/04/2026 13:11

SabrinaThwaite · 02/04/2026 13:03

Off topic, but that’s grim and hideously misogynistic.

Why can’t a girl like football without being transed?

It’s ridiculous isn’t it. I’m a season ticket holder (although someone else is using it at the moment) and have been going to games since I was 18 months old. Never thought I should have been a boy.

Swipe left for the next trending thread