GLP v EHRC judgement - Thread 2

[Another2Cats]

This is a continuation thread from here:

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5489699-glp-v-ehrc-judgement-is-coming-tomorrow?

Little hypocrite is back on X too

Good grief. It's sad, it really is.

Have you seen this. So much to unpack. He really is a loon.

Short of having "women don't have penises" tattooed across her forehead Bridget Phillipson could hardly be clearer about who she is choosing to stand with.

And it's the men's rights movement in drag that is transhate
^ https://archive.ph/Ul7g3^

https://bsky.app/profile/goodlawproject.org/post/3mf4yp4z6cs2k

People are agreeing with him!
Contagious loonyism
He's shocking

OMG. I just went for a little look at X, I like to see what Wings is posting.

And there is IW reposting the GLP. God he's thick. He hasn't even bothered to read why the GLP are "going to Strasbourg". It has nothing to do with trans people.

Hurray! The Euro Court will almost certainly order that UK trans people’s FULL recognition as the sex we transition to be FULLY RESTORED - and that toilet apartheid is illegal. As per what the UK was told 20 years ago. As is the norm across civilised Europe. Last week, the EU voted to fully recognise trans women as women.

@bphillipsonMP can avoid this embarrassment by simply restating the aim of the GRA 2004 - and over-rule the crooked UKSC ruling. Get in line with human rights. Ditch the hate. Come on our side Bridget. It’s the #RightSideOfHistory . Labour did it with flights to Rwanda. They can do it with this. Well done
@GoodLawProject

https://x.com/IndiaWilloughby/status/2024884272398541238?s=20

Oh he's such a idiot - every time he steps up to the keyboard he shows himself to be an utter fool.

What on earth is he doing to his eyelid?

What on earth is he doing to his eyelid?

I don't know, but he's doing as much heavy lifting as that filter is 😆

I am confused.
The GLP link is to a case that has nothing to do with Trans

Not as confused as IW clearly is 😄

What is the case about? (I'm appararently blocked from the GLP website.)

From the GLP website (not the full article)

We have taken the next step in our legal challenge by filing an application with the European Court of Human Rights. We are asking the court to rule on whether the decision of the English courts was lawful. This ruling prevents a six-year-old, legally known as D, from taking her mother’s surname and forces her to bear the name of the man who raped her mother.

Ah, thanks - totally unrelated then.

No idea how I got myself blocked from the website. I can still see their tweets. Perhaps it's going through an MN link that slams the portcullis shut.

😂😂 his face truly is a work of fiction

I want IW's filter; then I can truly look gorgeous too.
But I also need pouting lessons

I wouldn't describe Willy as gorgeous, even with those filters - many other words spring to mind, but gorgeous isn't one of them.

Unfiltered photos show the masculine jawline. I thought he'd had 'feminisation' surgery to his face? Apparently not.

And his brow

Someone should tell him to smile. He might find that validating.

And the hairline. The plugs are visible.

Oh yes well spotted😂

But..it’s true that women don't have penises. So is he saying that some women do have penises? The mind boggles, it really does at how unhinged people are over this issue.

Imagine if that wiz yer da.

Yes, his hairline is like one of those old fashioned Sindy dolls.

I don't usually make comments about someone's appearance, but IW is so utterly vile/ageist/misogynistic about women he doesn't like, that I'll make an exception.

I don't usually make comments about someone's appearance

Neither do I, my own appearance leaving much to be desired (weirdly, though I photograph astonishingly badly, looking like an escaped convict on a bad hair day, I’m considered quite attractive in RL), but that’s a mean, spiteful looking face.

Can someone help my understand the Fox Botherer’s reference to ‘the men’s rights movement dressed up in drag’.

I think I’ve been thrown by (1) interpreting this as potentially blaming men rather than women- although he may well think that the MRM is upheld by women (2) referencing drag in a way that what might be something other than 100% affirming of its positivity.

Can someone please explain his point.