Mail carry out investigation into Trans terror group Bash Back

[fromorbit]

Important;

Trans mob's plot to smash up the offices of senior politicians - including the Prime Minister and Wes Streeting
A transgender activist group is planning a series of attacks on senior politicians' offices, including the Prime Minister's, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

Militant group Bash Back has said its sights are also set on Wes Streeting - just months after vandalising his constituency office.

The gender warriors said: 'If you think we're done, you've got another thing coming.
'MP or PM, you've seen us once, we'll see you again.'

The group's conspiracy was uncovered by this newspaper after it urged members to form 'cells' and plot criminal damage offences against high-profile targets.

A list of other potential marks include the Free Speech Union (FSU) and feminist organisation Sex Matters.

Last night, we notified the Metropolitan Police and the parliamentary security services of our findings.

FSU founder Lord Young commissioned an independent security briefing about the group, which is calling for 'total transgender liberation'.

A transgender activist group is planning a series of attacks on senior politicians' offices, including the Prime Minister's

Militant group Bash Back has said its sights are also set on Wes Streeting - just months after vandalising his constituency office

The report, obtained by The Mail on Sunday, suggests British intelligence is monitoring the trans activist cells....

In a pamphlet obtained by this newspaper, Bash Back claims to target 'organisations that promote transphobic rhetoric - from banning hormones and puberty blockers, to confining us to or defining us out of categories of woman and man, to promoting conversion therapy and facilitating hideous harassment campaigns'.

It says they 'should come to expect us', adding: 'All of our targets have blood on their hands. We refuse to let them wash it off in peace.'

Bash Back's first public attack was on Mr Streeting's Ilford North constituency office in July, when it painted 'child killer' and smashed windows months after puberty blockers were banned for children on the advice of medical experts and the Cass Review of gender identity services.

Since then, the group has formulated an action guide - seen by this newspaper - for sympathisers to carry out similar attacks.

The document details how to avoid police detection as they plot criminal damage and steal equipment while filming their actions.

A security briefing on the group - also seen by The Mail on Sunday - reveals it has gone to extensive lengths to hide its identity, including removing internal metadata from public documents and using ultra-secure email systems.

The security memo says: 'Given the first attack was on the office of a HM Gov minister, almost certainly the group responsible will be investigated by security services.'

Activists engaged in criminal activity could be among the near 3,000 profiles following Bash Back across social media platforms, the security document adds.

Maya Forstater, the chief executive of Sex Matters - also included in the list of offices that are potential targets - said: 'After years in which police forces rolled out the red carpet for trans lobby groups and harassed women's rights campaigners, it's no wonder that Bash Back seems to believe it can cause criminal damage with impunity.'

A government spokesman said: 'Threats, harassment, and vandalism are not only cowardly, they're criminal and we will pursue anyone who targets politicians and their staff in this way, with the full force of the law.

'The rhetoric from this group is dangerous and only seeks to distract from our work to improve the lives of trans people.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15416739/Trans-mobs-plot-smash-offices-senior-politicians-including-Prime-Minister-Wes-Streeting.html

Many years after Trans groups started using political violence to silence women it seems the Police are actually investigating when male politician's property is under threat. Figures.

Supporting Violence and silencing women was always the main aim of trans stuff. The truth is coming out.

Mumsnet has been monitoring this group for a while.Previous threads
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5384285-trans-group-attack-wes-streetings-constituency-office

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5436532-trans-activists-vandalise-ehrc-who-want-labour-to-reject-supreme-court-ruling-guidelines-re-sex-biology

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5425523-welcome-to-a-new-era-of-trans-rage

Not to mention there is probably now some poor sod in GCHQ having to monitor online trans stuff for violent political extremism targeting British institutions. Rapid peaking position I would imagine.

“Admitted” is a strange choice of word there, or would be for most normal people.

”X admitted he had been injured when Y punched him.”

Yes it's a very strange choice of word. Almost trying to make the crime against them their own fault.

New article on Bash Back from the Times.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5513148-the-right-side-of-history-strikes-again

Not seen news about the supposed Police investigation into the group.

That picture with the balaclava looks very masculine.

Id wonder, if the security service is bothering with this, whether they'd view them as politically far left or far right, which seems to be the only way Prevent seems to be able to fathom groups. And whether they might see any crossover with Incels or Mens rights stuff.

The enthusiam for sticking labels like 'far left' and 'far right' on everything, which are merely a substitute for adult thinking, is one of the reasons we're in this mess. It's easy to identify your tribe, just look out for one of these buzzwords!

I had a poke about on Prevent and MI5 this morning. It largely is focussed on Islamism and Far Right. There's a bit on Incelism and confused or no ideology.

I think they added the confused/nihilist bit after it turned out Rudakabana had multiple referrals, but they never knew what to do with him because he didn't fit any of their neat ideological boxes.

Honestly, if you listen to interviews with American antifa types, it's hard not to conclude that these young men are mostly attracted by violence, and the ideology is just a way of making it socially acceptable (Chad, Portland, they/them: "yeah so I sucker punched this old dude who totally looked like a Trump voter, and that makes me the same as my great grandad who was in WW2") - if they'd been born in a different place, in a different social class, they might just as easily have been football hooligans or similar, and the NY Times and The Atlantic wouldn't be doing puff piece interviews with them.

The Prevent bods who insist that there must be a bad ideology behind extremism should just take a couple of hours and watch Fight Club.

It quite simple. If it happens to a woman it's not violent. If it happens to a trans person it's violent. Doesn't matter what the thing is, can be positive or negative.

As an example
A transwoman attacks a woman with a weapon so that the woman is hospitalised. This is not violent

A woman vaguely looks in the direction of a transwoman, this is violence and a direct threat to the transwoman's life.

I remember 1984, and all the opinion pieces in the papers saying, ha ha, Orwell got it wrong, we're nowhere near this (not saying 1984 was intended by Orwell as a literal prediction, but still). But now, we've got nearly the full suite: Newspeak, Doublethink, Thoughtcrime...