Rapists can no longer claim to be women

[fromorbit]

Wins coming thick and fast.

Rapists can no longer claim to be women
Police forces now expected to record sexual offenders by their sex and not preferred gender following Supreme Court ruling

https://archive.is/geM7Z

Bloody ridiculous that they could claim to be women in the first place. I'm totally done with this nonsense.

Finally some common sense

This really is good news. I found it so sickening to have mens crimes recorded as being committed by women. I assume shortly, no woman will have to call her rapist she

I imagine no man could ever understand that feeling

'Not a victory', hmm? Of course it's a bloody victory - a victory for common sense

Well, thank Christ for the return of some sense.

Excellent news!

That said, this is an area where I would actually still like the question of gender identity beliefs to be asked so the uncomfortable (for the TRAs) stat of sex offences being higher in the ‘trans identified’ population can still be recorded and discussed. It will continue to peak a lot of people.

They never bloody could! It's insane that the courts and press went along with it when there was NEVER any basis for it in law, the legal definition of rape is:

(1)A person (A) commits an offence if—
(a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,
(b)B does not consent to the penetration, and
(c)A does not reasonably believe that B consents.

I shall believe when I see it implemented.

The ideological capture is deep.

That said, Timor Kuran reports that when ideology or institutions collapse, it happens quickly (Private Truths, Public Lies). Like the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the USSR.

I’d like to think this is that moment but there are so many ideologues determined to maintain their oppressive structures and control.

I would like to see more of apologies like this from Ocado but I don’t expect it.

https://x.com/soniasodha/status/1913182381101510985

Any word on John Lewis et al on changing rooms?

Not yet, but as discussed on this thread it is another target for a win.
We cannot let our guard down. What next to protect women's rights?

Letter writing could help here. Just say it would be terrible if the company got sued over perverts now that women rights are back big time.

As pps have said, it's a travesty that it was allowed to be a thing in the first place anyway.

It's always boiled my blood when I have ever seen a headline saying 'woman rapes a 17 year old girl,' and you see a photograph of a man (wearing a blonde shoulder length wig,) with a five o clock shadow.

That is good news providing all police forces follow it.

Next step is to get mainstream media outlets and ipso to do the same.

Captured shops will just make all their changing rooms mixed-sex. Including Lingerie changing rooms. But won't bother with any signage to indicate this.

And it will be perfectly legal, because separating changing rooms by sex is legally permitted, rather than legally required.

Legal, but not logical.

Agree that I will only believe it when it is confirmed by a national body or individual that actually represents the police force. It’s only speculation in that article, though I dearly wish it wasn’t.

A swift collapse would be very welcome, but we’ve seen proof over and over of just how ingrained and embedded these lies have become.

That's a major one.

But a trans man can enter a woman’s toilet - a women with increased hair growth for a number of hormonal factors will now be asked to go to a man’s toilet

what a result

The headlines you hear about - very rare compared to the many MALE perpetuated crimes happening every second of every day that you don’t hear about

Hallelujah!

I don't care if it's only one headline a year (and it's not it's more) it is a LIE. It is a man who raped not a woman. And more than happy for crimes committed by men to be reported. Perhaps then there may be greater efforts to deal with it.

How ridiculous - never seen a woman asked to leave a woman's toilet. I've asked a man to leave though. He wasnt pretending to be a woman, just poor signage.

You have NO idea what is going on. We have an entire website listing these scumbags. Take a look. Sooo many... this is just the UK
https://transcrimeuk.com/

To be fair I suspect 90% of them would not have been seen as trans in the 90s but it was trans rights guys that all decided c 2005 that every criminal that ever put on a skirt was trans to the max and needed special treatment and was committing crimes while being a woman.

We just NOTICED this going on and got angry. Then we WON.

All you needed to do was just NOT support really evil men who probably never had a day in their life where they didn't enjoy being an awful man. Yet the trans movement made protecting crossdressing criminals ITS BIGGEST PRIORITY. Its leaders spent more time on stopping misgendering criminals and getting them into women's prisons than getting health care.

Interesting choice.

To be fair a whole bunch of the more reasonable trans types were against the whole "lets give trans support to every criminal we can find" plan. They got shouted down and ignored.

Remember the general public don't know about the full huge extent of the lets trans as many criminals as possible scheme. If they did trans popularity would be even lower.

Anyway we have sorted that problem for you. We have just made the trans community 100% safer by expelling all the criminals and making them all men again.

You can thank us later. And they say Terfs don't care about trans types.

Any thoughts as to what the BBC's take on this will be? Will they finally capitulate and stop referring to monsters like Scarlet Blake as woman/she?

(Not a rapist in this case, just a plain old violent male.)

Hmmm I wonder why a rapist would want to be classified as a woman and go to a woman’s prison… I can’t think of any obvious reason… 🤔

You really have no understanding of predators do you?