Surely it hinges on the actual NHS policy around single sex spaces, and whether the correct processes were followed in :
a) allowing DU to enter, and
b) censuring SP for objecting.
And as part of b) clarifying whether the admonishment was fleshed out by a patient safety concern.
NC has already, IMO, ascertained that DU probably just went in the female change rooms because he felt he deserved to be there, rather than this necessarily being hospital policy. I wonder if the hospital policy changed or was interpreted differently as the investigation went on, hence the debate about the missing emails. All of this is still to come.
NC isn’t going to win SP’s case against the NHS by a back and forth with DU where she tells him he’s male and he denies it, whilst spouting TRA nonsense,