So which is it?
The WBO should not be trusted when they say that Khelif is male?
Or WBO now miraculously should be trusted because they confirm that the report was false?
Or the WBO can be trusted with the accuracy of both statements?
I mean, I believe the WBO to be reliable in both statements they have made about this athlete. So I am going for the third option.
But only a short time ago there were many posters declaring the WBO was just as corrupt as the IBO, that they should never be trusted because they made a statement confirming that Khelif is a male during the Olympics. It kind of made some arguments lose their consistency.