I'll be interested to see their misogyny law, if it ever comes into being.
Because surely they'll have to be able to define what a "woman" is.
I mean, you can have a vague and wooly definition of "transgender", because it apparently just means giving yourself pronouns, and possibly wearing a cheap nylon wig, but "woman" is - in most people's minds - pretty specific. Perhaps they'll be forced to find the elusive definition that we've been asking for for years . . .
Sorry to be a pedant, but hasn’t Random Man misspelled ‘canon’ in that context?
As in, it should be ‘canon’ not cannon.
I assumed that he meant she was shooting the balls off IW and Co., one bollock at a time.
Edit for spelling