Because it doesn’t stack up.
I don’t believe that anyone on this thread is not well experienced enough to guard their personal identity. So the potential for getting personal information would be from someone who is very naive. And perhaps they should then not be on MN because it is known for begging scams etc.
But those people do benefit from the warnings and there has been more than one warning on this thread which is as it should be.
purple isn’t trying to ‘kill’ the story. If someone was attempting to kill the story, do you think that those of us who have indicated we support her would not see it? Maybe look at who is supporting and decide whether we are those who would miss such a blunt tactic.
The fact is, it would not have diminished the story to remove the identity of this poster, someone known to have a history on MN. I checked before it was changed. I saw a history there.
So it is not to kill the story or to even change it.
I think what is worse is that I saw yesterday and I don’t know when it was tweeted that Wings is discussing news of Douglas being a rapist being published soon. I am very concerned about that. Yes, Douglas should be exposed but not their victims. This should be handled with much care.
So, what benefit would Douglas be gaining from pretending to be their victim here?
I don’t doubt that Douglas has history on MN somewhere. It doesn’t take much. A long sleeper game. Have a profile that has a long history with single, often really short posts on very wide ranging topics (whatever is going on in active every few months or so). I would expect that would be the way to do it. I have reported trolls with that type of history and MN put up deletion messages that they were PBPs. Just playing the long game.
But to me, the logic doesn’t stack up that this poster in question is Douglas.
And casting doubt on her experience and legitimacy would be more Douglas’ style, in my opinion . Wouldn’t you all think?