Jess Bradley - government advisor and suspended NUS Trans Officer. Part iv

[Popchyk]

Previous thread:

Part 3

And an article written by Bradley's estranged wife:

www.sarahmcculloch.com/statement-jess-bradley/

Provides a lot of background and confirms that Action for Trans Health received a report of sexual assault and a further six reports of sexual misconduct of Jess Bradley.

www.sarahmcculloch.com/statement-jess-bradley/

"With ATH and NUS seemingly compromised, there is a third organisation conducting an investigation, the Proud Trust, an LGBT youth charity in Manchester who run the LGBT centre in Sidney Street among other things. I have spoken to them on the phone and they have said there are a number of safeguarding concerns which have been raised and they are receiving disclosures from any individuals who will be treated with confidence and respect, supported if they wanted the police involved but otherwise nothing will happen without the consent of the individuals involved unless they were under 18 at the time as they will have a statutory duty to disclose this".

I fail to see how a blog which consists entirely of pornographic images and videos of cis men means that trans women are threat to cis women in public spaces

Jess Bradley is a public flasher. Anyone who thinks it’s fine to allow a flasher to advise the government about whether it is safe for men to be in women’s spaces is..... not particularly rational???

A very interesting piece, thanks

That young woman is so deluded. All the overwhelming evidence that her friend/spouse is a common or garden flasher/groping perv and she clings desperately to the identities and the female pronouns and the casual demonisation of T**Fs. It sounds so hollow.

”trans-led efforts to create and maintain gender neutral public spaces”

If only that was where the pressure was being brought to bear. I don’t really understand the point she’s trying to make.

Dear lord. What a load of handwringing word salad.

Jess Bradley may not represent the entire trans community, but they absolutely represent the cavernous loopholes in what the trans community is demanding.

And moaning that people are using Bradley to expose either an agenda, or a loophole, only serves to highlight that the writer understands nothing of women's concerns, nor any safeguarding whatsoever.

Every time they open their mouth, they incriminate themselves further.

My browser (Firefox) is not allowing me to access the site. 'www.sarahmcculloch.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed.'

Jess Bradley is MARRIED?

It's like the script that abusers use. We need a Freedom Programme for women dealing with autogynaephiles.

I think the author of the article was at pains to say that they married for financial reasons.

"Our friendship ended messily and we are not on speaking terms".

I'm not sure that there was ever an intimate relationship between them.

Mind you, would you admit to shagging Bradley?

If they were a serious couple surely the contents of that blog of Bradley's would be grounds enough for divorce?
The penis pics were the least offensive part.

FINANCIAL REASONS?

He's a sugar mummy?

Chrome won't let me access it either, says it isn't safe.

Please could someone save it on the web archive (bottom right of page) so we can all see it?

web.archive.org/

I didn't think people married for financial reasons these days - that was what you did in the 60s and 70s

It's kind of hard to believe. How much is an office job at Labour these days? Presumably there was quite a lot of downtime, enough for one to get one's willy out.

The site seems to be gone. Did anyone save the text?

If you click the link at the top of the OPs second post, it seems to be okay. No dodgy messages.

Does this link work?

<a class="break-all" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190228231125/www.sarahmcculloch.com/statement-jess-bradley/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">web.archive.org/web/20190228231125/www.sarahmcculloch.com/statement-jess-bradley/

Second link works.
It seems to be chucking JB under the bus of their own making and aware that JB has given the 'TERFS' an example of what they're worried about.
It is another one of those 'wrong types of trans women' episodes.

She's actually saying that Bradley is the living, breathing example of how to exploit the very ideology that Bradley desperately promoting.

But seems to be knocking 'terfs' for recognising it.

#translogic

One may recall that in September 2017, following an physical attack on a TERF by an ATH member at an ATH counter-protest at Hyde Park corner as the TERFs were gathering for a public meeting,

I didn't know Tara Wolf was an Action for Trans Health member - did you all know that?

Can the ATH lead us to the other attackers on the video I wonder? Pony tail man, for example, is long overdue a visit from the police.

Yes- Bradley is everything ‘terfs’ are concerned about but it’s not nice to say it.
Trans logic indeed.

@howmanybiscuits Yes, re the Speakers' Corner confrontation: "It is believed the protesters were partly organised by campaign groups Sisters Uncut, Goldsmiths LGBTQ+ Society and Action for Trans Health London." - impeccable source of Pink News (which strangely never reported on Tara Wolf's conviction).
www.pinknews.co.uk/2017/09/17/woman-beaten-as-trans-exclusionary-radical-feminists-and-trans-activists-fight-in-speakers-corner/

Ugh. I can’t even with these utter creeps. Then NUS should be squeaky clean. Or should name change to become the national union of male students and people who aren’t actually students and sex pests and flashers.
How dare it not publicise its investigation into a staff member that has been accused of something so serious as this?

Does anyone know if the Govt bodies JB advised, have been made aware of their behaviour?