Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

If you don't believe the Sussex children are real....

481 replies

SleepingStandingUp · 24/06/2026 12:14

... can you explain it to me? So many comments on media articles etc saying oh it's because the kdis aren't theirs, they're actors, they have no kids, they just rent them for photos.

Archie was born in England, the Royal family met him, she was photographed with a tiny baby.
Do you think it was a doll or someone was paid to hand over their baby for a photo?
Who are these people who rent our their kids for photos? Why don't they sell their exclusive story for millions?
Why has no one around her, or where the kids reportedly educated, done the same?
What happens when the "kids" become adults and can't reasonably be kept out of sight? Will they "kill" them off, come clean or adopt a couple of fake actors to play the role?

OP posts:
Bloodorangesoda · 25/06/2026 22:39

TooBigForMyBoots · 25/06/2026 21:11

It's no different to If you think the moonlandings were faked / earth is flat threads. And no one has to respond. @SleepingStandingUp is addressing people who believe this shit or are interested in people who believe this shit.

If that's not you, give the thread a swerve, instead of calling for the deletion of a thread others are interested in.🤷‍♀️

So you are interested in hearing conspiracy theories about the children, and you are no better than anyone else.

Gizimajob · 25/06/2026 23:23

jeffgoldblum · 24/06/2026 14:24

I think we all know why!!!
this is now the second thread started about the Sussex’s children!
obviously they are purposely being started to stir!
the question is why?
an attempt to get insults about them for harvesting?
or just good old fashioned click bait.

Are you saying the Sussexes may be deliberately trying to generate insults about their children - so they can harvest them - to use as proof that they are being unfairly badly treated?
So messed up!!

TooBigForMyBoots · 25/06/2026 23:42

MrsEmmelineLucas · 25/06/2026 21:25

You don't instruct people to "give the thread a swerve"?!
Perhaps people want to comment or respond to comments! That's the point of threads!

Exactly. Not come on them to request their deletion.

LipglossAndLies · 26/06/2026 10:37

Gizimajob · 25/06/2026 23:23

Are you saying the Sussexes may be deliberately trying to generate insults about their children - so they can harvest them - to use as proof that they are being unfairly badly treated?
So messed up!!

Yes there are people out there who really believe they do...scary insight into their mindset.

Arjan · 26/06/2026 11:01

Remember how the Sussex’s showed footage of paps as proof they were hounded, only for it to be revealed the footage was of paps at a Katie Price court outing and a separate film premiere, so I think people can be excused for suspecting there is no limit to the manipulation the Sussex’s are prepared to stoop to to make a point.

Ihateboris · 26/06/2026 11:05

Arjan · 26/06/2026 11:01

Remember how the Sussex’s showed footage of paps as proof they were hounded, only for it to be revealed the footage was of paps at a Katie Price court outing and a separate film premiere, so I think people can be excused for suspecting there is no limit to the manipulation the Sussex’s are prepared to stoop to to make a point.

Ha ha ha 😂..I remember this. Hilarious they thought they could get away with it to be honest 🤣

IAmATorturedPoet · 26/06/2026 11:11

Prince Harry/Harry Potter - easy mistake to make 😁

jeffgoldblum · 26/06/2026 11:12

Arjan · 26/06/2026 11:01

Remember how the Sussex’s showed footage of paps as proof they were hounded, only for it to be revealed the footage was of paps at a Katie Price court outing and a separate film premiere, so I think people can be excused for suspecting there is no limit to the manipulation the Sussex’s are prepared to stoop to to make a point.

Yes ! The other one was stock footage from a Harry Potter film premiere, artistically changed to black and white!

edit to add ! Cross post !😁

ThatCyanCat · 26/06/2026 11:13

IAmATorturedPoet · 26/06/2026 11:11

Prince Harry/Harry Potter - easy mistake to make 😁

I remember the Harry Pothead film posters...

IAmATorturedPoet · 26/06/2026 11:27

ThatCyanCat · 26/06/2026 11:13

I remember the Harry Pothead film posters...

😂
There have some very amusing memes that have come off the back of various Sussex blunders. The ones that followed the publication of 'Spare' deserve a special mention😂

Sarah2891 · 26/06/2026 11:29

Anyone who genuinely believes they don't have children needs to check into a psychiatric unit.

MrsEmmelineLucas · 26/06/2026 11:33

Arjan · 26/06/2026 11:01

Remember how the Sussex’s showed footage of paps as proof they were hounded, only for it to be revealed the footage was of paps at a Katie Price court outing and a separate film premiere, so I think people can be excused for suspecting there is no limit to the manipulation the Sussex’s are prepared to stoop to to make a point.

They are utterly shameless! It's not the only lie, but it's up there in their top 3.

MrsEmmelineLucas · 26/06/2026 11:35

jeffgoldblum · 26/06/2026 11:12

Yes ! The other one was stock footage from a Harry Potter film premiere, artistically changed to black and white!

edit to add ! Cross post !😁

Edited

It's like all those lies Meghan claimed about only being allowed to wear beige as a working royal - it took about 30 seconds with Google to find her wearing bright yellow, red, blue, green and purple.
So funny!

ThatCyanCat · 26/06/2026 11:37

Given that they clearly do want to make a living by using their titles and being photographed at events, I can no longer understand why they didn't stay as working royals. I'm sure they could have split their time between the US and UK if they wanted to.

Bloodorangesoda · 26/06/2026 11:48

Arjan · 26/06/2026 11:01

Remember how the Sussex’s showed footage of paps as proof they were hounded, only for it to be revealed the footage was of paps at a Katie Price court outing and a separate film premiere, so I think people can be excused for suspecting there is no limit to the manipulation the Sussex’s are prepared to stoop to to make a point.

Don’t forget the made up news headlines that had to be cut from the UK broadcast of the Oprah interview.

Gizimajob · 26/06/2026 11:57

ThatCyanCat · 26/06/2026 11:37

Given that they clearly do want to make a living by using their titles and being photographed at events, I can no longer understand why they didn't stay as working royals. I'm sure they could have split their time between the US and UK if they wanted to.

I suspect they wanted to pick and choose which activities/events they took part in as working royals.
They were also probably hoping that they could have a lucrative “non royal working life” (in addition to be working royals) ie make money out of their titles. This was not allowed so they left.

MrsEmmelineLucas · 26/06/2026 12:03

Bloodorangesoda · 26/06/2026 11:48

Don’t forget the made up news headlines that had to be cut from the UK broadcast of the Oprah interview.

Oh yes, the racist "UK publications" which turned out to be nothing of the sort.

MrsEmmelineLucas · 26/06/2026 12:04

ThatCyanCat · 26/06/2026 11:37

Given that they clearly do want to make a living by using their titles and being photographed at events, I can no longer understand why they didn't stay as working royals. I'm sure they could have split their time between the US and UK if they wanted to.

They were carried away by their own popularity. They didn't realise it was because they were royal, not that they were Harry and Meghan. They saw dollar signs.

ThatCyanCat · 26/06/2026 12:04

Gizimajob · 26/06/2026 11:57

I suspect they wanted to pick and choose which activities/events they took part in as working royals.
They were also probably hoping that they could have a lucrative “non royal working life” (in addition to be working royals) ie make money out of their titles. This was not allowed so they left.

I was actually a supporter of theirs when they left. I thought it was a shame but there were a couple of absolutely awful racist articles about Meghan and I didn't blame them for wanting to sack it all off and they were talking about financial independence. I thought Harry would focus on the Invictus Games and Meghan would use her industry contacts to start up a production company or talent agency or something. Something different and lower key.

But it's become obvious that they don't want to escape the press or do something different or lower key at all and it's really burned through my goodwill for them.

Gizimajob · 26/06/2026 12:35

ThatCyanCat · 26/06/2026 12:04

I was actually a supporter of theirs when they left. I thought it was a shame but there were a couple of absolutely awful racist articles about Meghan and I didn't blame them for wanting to sack it all off and they were talking about financial independence. I thought Harry would focus on the Invictus Games and Meghan would use her industry contacts to start up a production company or talent agency or something. Something different and lower key.

But it's become obvious that they don't want to escape the press or do something different or lower key at all and it's really burned through my goodwill for them.

Yeah, same.

jeffgoldblum · 26/06/2026 12:46

Bloodorangesoda · 26/06/2026 11:48

Don’t forget the made up news headlines that had to be cut from the UK broadcast of the Oprah interview.

Yes I believe it was either photoshopped or from Australian and American publications!
however I question why it was decided to cut our broadcast?
to protect us from the truth? ( which didn’t work anyway with sm being global)
or to protect the Sussex’s?

NotTalkinBoutTheLinen · 26/06/2026 13:00

Meghan wrote a letter to her father intending to leak it, did so via friends, then sued when the remainder was published. She was then reprimanded for lying in court about their collaboration on Finding Freedom.

It’s very sad but shows her ability to be deeply manipulative in an attempt to protect and defend herself. She must have felt extremely alone and unprotected. That doesn’t make it less shocking.

wordler · 26/06/2026 16:32

jeffgoldblum · 26/06/2026 12:46

Yes I believe it was either photoshopped or from Australian and American publications!
however I question why it was decided to cut our broadcast?
to protect us from the truth? ( which didn’t work anyway with sm being global)
or to protect the Sussex’s?

Because it was false - the voiceover claimed it was all British press headlines - so once it was pointed out that wasn’t true - after it had been broadcast in the US they had to edit it.

jeffgoldblum · 26/06/2026 16:41

wordler · 26/06/2026 16:32

Because it was false - the voiceover claimed it was all British press headlines - so once it was pointed out that wasn’t true - after it had been broadcast in the US they had to edit it.

Edited

Was this ever brought up or pointed out to Netflix or America?

wordler · 26/06/2026 18:49

jeffgoldblum · 26/06/2026 16:41

Was this ever brought up or pointed out to Netflix or America?

Sorry we might be talking about two different things - the ‘racist’ headlines was the Oprah interview - it was definitely brought up to the Oprah production company which is why they made the edit.

Re the wrong video footage in the Netflix doc I don’t know but I’m sure whoever sourced the footage and mistook paps at Sussex Crown Court for paps chasing the Sussexes and photographers at the Harry Potter prem must have been very embarrassed when they realized their mistake!

Wonder if it was a work experience person who put photographers + Sussex into the search engine?