Wait, what!? The biggest threats to the monarchy ever are… Harry and Meghan, so why did King Charles cancel Andrew?!?

[TallerSally]

Tough times for Meghan and Harry anti-fans…

WTF just happened?? Did King Charles tick the wrong box on the prince cancellation form? Did his autopen slip?

Because we all know that whilst Andrew was never actually proven to be a nonce, there is ample evidence of M&H's appalling crimes. Take for example Meghan driving around Paris with her feet up in a limo - why oh why don't people understand, it's evidence that she orchestrated Diana's death! Then Harry, whose wife is 43% of Nigerian descent, was racist and misogynist towards the chair of Sentebale! And don't get me started on them trick or treating with their kids while swilling a bottle of AsEver vodka… Geez.

Judging from the millions of posts on these boards, these two have a rap sheet long enough to circle the world twice. It's only a matter of time before UK MPs, US congressmen, the Met Police and the FBI call them in for questioning, right? - in fact, I'm sure the news will break soon... very soon!

So why on earth isn't King Charles listening? Why go after Andrew, who, OK, is a tad arrogant and a bit of an oaf, as well as a liar, apologist of convicted paedos and child traffickers, befriender of Chinese spies and Kazakh dictators, cash for access salesman, hirer of 40 Thai prostitutes in 3 days, public purse freeloader, rent-free grifter, blocker of Palace statements of support for child sexual abuse victims, and so on and so forth, all of which are… er… excusable, according to some.

Well, breaking news, I know what happened! Remember when King Charles met the soon-to-be-cancelled traitor Prince Harry in September, who brought him some gifts? Odds are one was a jar of juju jam, prepared by that Witch of Montecito in her big cauldron. One scoop of that has had King Charles cancelling the wrong prince!

You read it here first 😂

(actually, I think Andrew's cancellation makes it LESS likely Harry's princedom will be cancelled too, not the other way 'round - sorry!)

awaits .....they did an interview. called someone racist...wrote a book.
good luck op the "fans" will be along soon.

By the way Lownie really has it in for the Nonce.

I have no doubt Lownie can substantiate everything in his book about Andrew.

I also suspect there has been an element of personal vindictiveness, given he described in his Times publicity interview (when the book was being serialised) hating Andrew so much when at school that they would 'give him a kicking' in rugby.

Oh God…it’s the Links Lady back again!🤣

I’m glad AMW has been exposed and demoted but Andrew Lownie strikes me as the creepiest man - a muck-raker masquerading as an investigative hero.

@TallerSally Who said the biggest threats to the Monarchy ever are H&M. ?

Oh dear ladies! , there was a reason nobody posted.

Great OP @TallerSally You have a way with words.

Montecito FTW. 😊

Alleged deeply corrupt alleged pedo vs privileged brats the gutter press dont like. It’s a tough call as to who is a bigger threat to the richest monarchy in the world.

Andrew must have done something really bad to be kicked out into the cold and not just be a newspaper villain of the royal family in the yah-boo pantomime.

Abject apologies - just got off a long train journey - befuddled 😊

❤️😉

No. Luxembourg is the richest monarchy.

The cobwebs in someone’s mind

In Europe, I should add. I think it's the House of Saud globally.
The House of Windsor is 11th in terms of wealth, I believe.

I think people aren't taking into consideration that H & M are inherently evil. Just evil, I tell you.

Andrew's foibles pale into insignificance beside them.
The King has unquestionably got it wrong!

Aren’t they all like actual reptiles or something like that you know yeah?

Yes! I've even seen it on YouTube...

Alleged deeply corrupt alleged pedo vs privileged brats the gutter press dont like. It’s a tough call as to who is a bigger threat to the richest monarchy in the world.

Andrew must have done something really bad to be kicked out into the cold and not just be a newspaper villain of the royal family in the yah-boo pantomime.

@Weefreetiffany hopefully you don’t mind that I crossed out a few of your words because the rest of your post is spot on.

I don’t know specific names, but multiple people thought them to be a big enough threat that royalists were calling for removal of their titles. We’ve seen now what it takes to remove a title - and it’s not telling on a few family members.

I Do think William could remove Harry’s title, thus Meghan’s would be gone, but imo he won’t touch the titles of Archie and Lili unless he removes Charlottes and Louis’s and they are all lifetIme titles only. The Sentiment of the members of the commonwealth countries matters too in this too.

The Sentiment of the members of the commonwealth countries matters too in this too

In what way? @BeeWitchy

I’m glad AMW has been exposed and demoted but Andrew Lownie strikes me as the creepiest man - a muck-raker masquerading as an investigative hero.

Oh absolutely. I've been a bit 🤔 about him previously, but everyone just said his credentials as a historian are impeccable, which is all very well. But I saw an interview with him yesterday on The Daily Beast and to my mind, he took great delight in describing the further woes coming Andrews way. It's as if he has a personal vendetta of some kind not limited to Andrew either, but the entire HoW.

There was also the claim of Andrew having 40 prostitutes in a weekend which was very shocking. I do not doubt a sleaze like Andrew would hire prostitutes, and the incident happened, but 40 seemed an oddly specific number and added to the shock factor and I wonder where the number came from. It had the flavour of a tabloid attention feature. It's not a detail that would be out of place on the cover of The Sun.

That said, no one seems to be filing against him. But on the other hand, if I had further skeletons in my closet that could come out, I wouldn't necessarily be pushing hard for libel either.

He's done a service in bringing some of these serious abuses of position by Andrew out, no doubt about it. Done a great service to the Epstein victims too. Not so sure about his motivations however.

@BeeWitchy "The Sentiment of the members of the commonwealth countries matters too in this too." There are 15 Commonwealth Realms which have KCIII as Monarch, out of 56 members. What do you actually think are the sentiments of the 41 countries that are not realms (I would presume indifference, but you may beg to differ), and what should their input be? Do they have any right, beyond idle interest, to be concerned about the titles held by anyone?

Thinking about it, Tonga might when it comes to their own king.

I was referring to the commonwealth countries that have the British Monarch as their HoS.

Not the Commonwealth of Nations that the British Monarch is head of - by agreement.

@BeeWitchy Yes, I'm sure you were.

Hen why did you ask?

Please excuse me if I am taking it the wrong way, but is the use of the word "hen" really approriate in this context?