Another load of regulars seem to have fekked off again.

[bibbitybobbityhat]

Thunderduck

Beanieb

TrillianAstra

Flatcap

I haven't been posting much lately and I did miss the end of the Daily Mail debate.

So, I come back after some time away - and its all gone funny. I guess lots of people have namechanged ...

Or did Boldies actually happen?

[JustineMumsnet]

What you on about women? No one was banned over the Daily Mail thing, unless you count me - I took a spell off in an institution.
We don't ban people for shouting at us as a rule, though there could always be a first time .

[AitchTwoToTangOh]

ah, good. it did sound unlikely, you wanker.

[JustineMumsnet]

Au contraire KM - we've never once deleted an attack on MNHQ - even when what's been said is completely untrue - but we do delete personal attacks on members.

[JustineMumsnet]

Ah x-posts again KM

[FimboFortuna]

Was Flatcap, Twinset?

[Ronaldinhio]

thank feck the dm stuff has gone away

vv boring imho

[NormaStanleyFletchachacha]

I am here

[Tortington]

completely with ronaldhinio

[1dilemma]

is twinset still around?
does anyone know if she managed to sort her house out?

[Morosky]

Yes she sold her house, eventually.

[1dilemma]

cool
glad for her

[beanieb]

oooh I made a list

I am still here but sticking to TTC with this username mostly. Didn't leave because of the DM thing.

[Bella27]

shiney I wasn't giving you incorrect information: I was blocked.

On 21 Aug 2009 I sent the following e mail to MNHQ:

'Please explain why I am blocked from rejoining mumsnet, and why any email address I use on my computer is blocked too?

Presumably you have a cookie installed in my computer - kindly remove it forthwith.'

I then must have received a reply from Catherine at MNHQ asking who I was, because I have sent another e mail later that day telling her I was Bella21.

I received no further replies from MNHQ.

I am only on here now because I rejoined on another computer.

Presumably Justine doesn't know about this, or it was just a technical hitch, but I have been telling the truth.

[Bella27]

Oh ,and I'm querying MNHQ on it - again.

Will let you know if I hear anything this time

[TrillianAstra]

Just want to say that if they had blocked you they wouldn't need to put something on your computer (and it's easy enough for you to remove cookies), they would be blocking your IP address, which is like digital signature saying which internet connection something comes from.

[CNyle]

shudder at bolding

[Flamesparrow]

"kindly remove it forthwith"

seriously???

I'd prob not bother replying to that either tbh

[Bella27]

If you read my post Flamesparrow you'll see that Catherine did reply, asking who I was. Once I had told her, I didn't get any reply as to why I had been blocked.

I don't care about getting a reply, I only wanted to prove that I was blocked.

Reckon I've done that

[TrillianAstra]

Hi Flame - I am trying to be on here more but the damn job keeps making me do work

[DoNotPressTheRedButton]

I've been banned from mumsnet and can tell you what it looks like



(I wasn't being punished, something else)

basically all you get is a title age with links; when you click the link it just goes round and round for ages then nothing happens or it comes up page not found.

Sounds like the other was a technical glitch, tbh

[Bella27]

I tried several times, over the course of several days, to rejoin.

Each time the registration page came back up again with an asterisk next to my email address, saying there was a problem with my registration. On another computer it worked straight away, no problem. I now understand about IP addresses - I didn't at first.

Perhaps tech can shed some light.