Troll hunters and HQ.

[MiddletonPink]

If a poster is accused of being a troll on a thread numerous times and by more than one person then HQ pull the thread because of troll hunting shouldn't the accused be vindicated by HQ first?

Clear as mud, indeed!

Thank you Kate.

I suppose we have to read between the lines that it was a troll?

I'm assuming that's what you mean

The secret PMer was a troll then.

I wondered where you were usual.

I've just got home from work, Middleton.

The poster stopped posting at about 10 am this morning. Iiiiiiiinteresting. Or not, when you realise the whole pathetic-ness of emotional vampiry.

I just don't understand why HQ didn't say the poster wasn't genuine.

They have done in the past. Unless they weren't/aren't sure.

What i am wondering (out of pure nosiness), is whether hq thought it was the same person as the original OP, or someone else latching on to the story to feel important?

I think because they weren't technically the OP. And maybe they're not 100% sure but things are indicative. Maybe?

I mean the OP of the TAAT, not the original. Christ this is hard work.

I get you , want.

I love the way KateMumsnet always says 'Hullo.'

It's so Enid Blyton. :D

oops, smiley fail.

OVH you missed out the dead hamster...
Though that's not a subject to joke about.