Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Man-Bashing, Bannings, Criticisms, Rules, Questions - Answers & Opinions please

253 replies

bobkford · 21/07/2011 11:21

After reading the site for a few months, due to my girlfriend using it (lurking usually), I decided to express my thoughts via a little animated short, and yesterday I joined up and posted a link to it here. It was soon removed and I was banned. Hmmm.

I won't post it again. You can find it on YouTube if you search 'Mumsnet No Menz' I don't think it was offensive. It was critical of Mumsnet in a humorous way... is that why I was banned? I looked in the rules and can find only 'Talk - all human life is there' and "Our policy is to keep intervention to a minimum and let the conversation flow. Having said that, we will remove postings that are obscene, contain personal attacks or break the law."

I don't see how the former is true if light-hearted critiques of Mumsnet are not allowed, but more so, my video was not obscene, did not contain any personal attacks or break the law' It did however raise some points, which I would honestly like Mumsnet or Mumsnetters opinions on. Please don't be too defensive (or indulge in 'personal attacks' of course) I think Mumsnet is on the whole a force for good, and one my partner and I may be seriously grateful for if and when a baby comes - but I also think it is not perfect and should not censor criticism. Such as

  1. The site is called Mumsnet, but it is subtitled By Parents For Parents. Yet fathers are at best a token presence here, as most have realized they are not free to debate on issues where they find themselves in disagreement with a woman/women. Men are constantly mocked and ridiculed - in the AIBU section for example so many threads ask 'AIBU to be fucked off with my useless husband...' and women line up to say 'your husband sounds like a total pillock, throw his dinner in the bin' - reverse the sexes and the man would be labelled a misogynist bully and shown the door. If women found a website where men talked about their partners like that they would be horrified. The website moderators do nothing to confront man-bashing, so men leave or end up banned if they begin to complain.
  1. I am not a Men's Rights Activist, nor anti-feminist (my gf is a feminist) but anyone who does not label themselves a feminist has their card marked. Any man that discusses an issue and does not agree with the 'feminist line' on the subject will be likely be labelled a troll and soon banned Hardly 'all human life is here'
  1. As my video said I DO think its strange or inappropriate that there is a feminist section (and quote a dogmatic one if I may add) on Mumsnet, where so many regulars of that section proudly claim NOT to be parents.
It seems strange that a father on a parenting site can be banned for disagreeing with a (childless) feminist, about parenting issues, or gender issues, or many things. And yes, I have seen many virulently anti-male things in that section, yet it's virtually off-limits to even some moderate feminists (like my gf) because she would disagree with some of the rad fem positions and get abused/banned. It also seems to serve little purpose because discussion is not welcome there, only agreement with the feminist view on the matter. My feminist gf feels the same way, the members should welcome a chance to debate, even if they have done it before many times, as they are 'ambassadors' for feminism, and there are people reading.
  1. I am not a father yet, but hopefully I soon will be. I don't want a Mumsnet AND a Dadsnet - I'd like Mumsnet to be more even handed with both sexes, or if thats not possible just admit its a site for mums/women and say men/dads aren't allowed. I'd much prefer the former of course. I want to do as much parenting as possible when I have children, and would hope I would be as welcome as any mother would be at Mumsnet, come the time I need advice help and support.
  1. And finally, banning. How about an explanation when someone is banned? The men's rights activists were quite obvious, and I suppose could be banned if 'here to cause trouble' - but then again why couldn't a father who also believes in men's rights activism post here at a site for parents, unless he breaking a rule? Is this site only for people with one set of opinions? I have read the site's originators say that the site has no party line, all voices are there - is that really true? Is criticism, even done in an allegedly humorous way like my video, or this post, unwelcome? Am I now unwelcome because I've returned after being banned? I have heard regulars say that they would like to know the reason why someone got banned, I think it would be useful too.

I hope that isn't too long, and that I don't come across as a 'trouble maker' - As someone who may be needing Mumsnet or similar soon, I'm very interested in asking these questions and raising these criticisms, hopefully constructively.

OP posts:
AuntieMonica · 22/07/2011 13:25
Grin

but i did say up-thread, it's in jar Wink

swallowedAfly · 22/07/2011 13:26

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

WhereYouLeftIt · 22/07/2011 13:28

"I notice you namechanged in the exact time frame our strange friend found himself back online continuing his worthy crusade."
How do you notice these things, StayFrosty ?

Velvetunderground · 22/07/2011 13:29

I think its good to not have a profile in cases where the woman is seeking help in relationships for DV, the fact she could be anyone helps give courage to get the help they need. I would not want to take that away just cos some twat has a twisted agenda.

QueenOfFeckingEverything · 22/07/2011 13:47

Grin @ 'male sex organ away'

Profiles should not be compulsory.

I wonder about a nominal joining fee (10p or something) that had to be paid by credit/debit card or paypal - thus giving MNHQ a much better idea of who was trolling or using multiple accounts. But that would exclude those who had no card/paypal account - not sure how big a problem would that be?

WhereYouLeftIt · 22/07/2011 13:54

Good idea Queen. Probably quite a numerically small problem, but a huge one for those people it applies to (I'm thinking particularly of those suffering financial abuse). But MN could possibly find a way around that, e.g. extra ID details required, probationary term, etc.

swallowedAfly · 22/07/2011 14:15

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

AbsDuCroissant · 22/07/2011 14:22

You know how superman, or some such super hero had the thing "up up and awaaaaaaaaaaay!", maybe the loser superhero "menztrollz" could say "male sex organ awaaaaaaaaaay!!!" as he flies off the board to go and make youtube vidz about how MNerz are being MEAN to him

Lillabet · 22/07/2011 14:22

I like the idea of the invisible banning stratgey. Grin
I used to play on an online game server where if the moderator(s) didn't like what you were saying (and these were open minded mods) they would "Llama" you, this meant that whatever vitriolic dribble you spouted just showed up as "Llama Llama Llama Llama Llama Llama, Llama Llama!" to everyone else Grin. It was up to the moderators when you ceased to be Llama'd; a 12 hour stint usually did the trick and persistent offenders were banned for anything between 24 hours and lifetime! You couldn't rejoin either - not sure how that was achieved but I am sure my DH could explain! Hmm
I'm not a lady but I'm not a bloke! Grin

AbsDuCroissant · 22/07/2011 14:25

swallowed - is this the same group who are coming up with this "bringing down the patriarchy" malarky? Can I join? Pleeeeeeeeeeeeease?

swallowedAfly · 22/07/2011 14:31

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Velvetunderground · 22/07/2011 14:43

I have just got it - this guy thinks he is attacking MN and watching "us" when really the radfems were already watching him.

He should be afraid, very afraid Grin

Tortington · 23/07/2011 19:00

movie genius i am a genius

LadyOfTheManor · 23/07/2011 19:09

Is it bad that I read all of his posts in the weird robotic voice as in his video?

TheCrackFox · 23/07/2011 19:12

You are indeed a movie genius Custardo.

DuelingFanjo · 23/07/2011 19:12

the op of this thread posted all his op on some weird site and admits it contains lies about his personal life, I'm not sure I understand the point of it all.

Velvetunderground · 23/07/2011 19:14

ffs get a life.

DuelingFanjo · 23/07/2011 19:16

here

DuelingFanjo · 23/07/2011 19:18

and I wonder if this is the same person?

Tortington · 23/07/2011 19:24

thank you thank you

dan said i was an artist, thats all the acknowledgement i need

Velvetunderground · 23/07/2011 19:48

i vote for the llama translation.

CMNS sit on the sofa, have a cuppa and tell me where all this anger comes from dear xx

TheCrackFox · 23/07/2011 19:58

This is a quote from MumsnetSucks

"I think the video medium reaches a certain demographic that wouldn't necessarily be bothered with trawling through a lot of text. "

Or to paraphrase the thick people will like the video.

Tortington · 23/07/2011 19:59

s'why i did a video innit

Tortington · 23/07/2011 20:01

velvetunderground i think you meant 'hangar' and i have a Hangar to store my private jet sweetie.

aliceliddell · 23/07/2011 20:25

How much longer must this madness last? 175 posts and counting, all about some bloke who thinks feminism isn't fair to men?