Presumably those “great state schools” in your area existed when you decided to send your child elsewhere. But it’s a free country and you made your choice, though unfortunately for your child it might have been the wrong choice if you can no longer afford it and the “great state schools” in your area are unaccountably full. I wonder what the conversations were about between the parents when you made your choice?
Small classes. Latin. Better sports facilities. The new science block. The on site drama centre. Extra curricular activities. Extended days. Skiing trips. Smarter uniforms. Russell Group university destinations.
I doubt if they were voicing concerns for the children in the “great state schools” , not to mention those in not so great state schools, who couldn’t access the advantages some parents thought were worth paying for.
It’s a bit rich ( if you will excuse the term) to start a bit of a whinge when it turns out that you thought you didn’t need a safety net because you had bought your way out of danger but have now discovered that the holes in the safety net are much larger than you thought, and some children, hopefully not yours, are falling straight through.
And yes, I do know that parents paying private school fees are also paying for state education through taxation. As incidentally are all the other taxpayers who don’t have children in education.