Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

2y old paddling in sea - safety - opinions please

113 replies

Anoriginalusername2 · 06/08/2026 08:29

Opinions please. 2y old with no life vest paddling in very calm sea. Parent is 15m away, intermittently watching. Is this ok?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Octavia64 · 06/08/2026 08:30

15 minutes, miles or meters?

Mumsntfan1 · 06/08/2026 08:30

No

Oscillating · 06/08/2026 08:31

No. The child should be with an adult at all times. Preferably holding hands att all times too.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

SnowflakeSmasher86 · 06/08/2026 08:32

No. i wouldn’t be ok with that.

A 2 year old, I’d either be holding their hand or at least be standing directly next to them so that if they fell over I could scoop them up before a wave washed over them.

HatAndScarf33 · 06/08/2026 08:32

The paddling in calm sea without a vest is ok, but they should be watched the whole time and parent should be closer imo. Things can happen so fast.

Oscillating · 06/08/2026 08:33

Imagine asking this
"I leave my 2 year old alone in the bath, and I sit in my bedroom and go in and check every few minutes".

Would that be reasonable? Of course not.

Dermatologically · 06/08/2026 08:33

No. They should be holding a parents hand or arms reach at that age. The life vest wouldn't make it any better if they weren't within arms reach either

waitinginwonderland · 06/08/2026 08:34

The paddling without a vest is fine but parent shouldn’t be out of arms reach.

Neolara · 06/08/2026 08:34

It's absolutely fine if you're standing over them or very close (1-2 meters away).and watching them continually. 15 meters away is nuts.

SilkRoads · 06/08/2026 08:35

15m is a long way.

Gardenisablooming · 06/08/2026 08:35

Given how many dc have drowned recently def not from me.
Some were in with an adult.
Still weren't safe.

TrunkElliot · 06/08/2026 08:35

Does ‘intermittently watching’ mean the parent is mostly on their phone?

Candleflakes · 06/08/2026 08:35

Absolutely not. That’s horrific parenting stupid.

LathkillDale · 06/08/2026 08:35

No!

TeenToTwenties · 06/08/2026 08:36

You should be close enough to scoop them up instantly.

Sparrowsandbudgies · 06/08/2026 08:36

Dermatologically · 06/08/2026 08:33

No. They should be holding a parents hand or arms reach at that age. The life vest wouldn't make it any better if they weren't within arms reach either

This.

EwwSprouts · 06/08/2026 08:38

No. Intermittently is bonkers. Needs to have hand held.

arethereanyleftatall · 06/08/2026 08:46

No. Arms reach.

JLou08 · 06/08/2026 09:27

Of course it's not. I'd guess you know that, surely no one would be daft enough to ask it here. Child's father or grandparents did it?

WineAndBridgerton3322 · 06/08/2026 09:40

WTF. NO, not ok. Parent should be there holding their hand. Anything further than half a metre is too far.

INeedaDietcoke · 06/08/2026 10:25

The red flag here is 'intermittently' watching. No matter how close or far you are a parent should be alert and continuously monitoring, not intermittently. I have let my kids play in very calm water (no waves, minimal current, water up to ankles) with no life vest and been more than a couple of metres away, but have had my eyes on them at all times, ready to react.

Iocanepowder · 06/08/2026 10:26

Fuck no. My 2 year old is tiny. I would be next to her at all times.

IkaBaar · 06/08/2026 10:27

Not Ok, at that age they should be within arms reach. No need for life vest if parent should be within arms reach.

mtobrokeme · 06/08/2026 10:29

No. I would say if you can’t be arsed to get up and play in the sea with your 2 year old then the person shouldn’t have had children.

CatsMcGoo · 06/08/2026 10:43

No.

Swipe left for the next trending thread