Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

2y old paddling in sea - safety - opinions please

113 replies

Anoriginalusername2 · 06/08/2026 08:29

Opinions please. 2y old with no life vest paddling in very calm sea. Parent is 15m away, intermittently watching. Is this ok?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Octavia64 · 06/08/2026 08:30

15 minutes, miles or meters?

Mumsntfan1 · 06/08/2026 08:30

No

Oscillating · 06/08/2026 08:31

No. The child should be with an adult at all times. Preferably holding hands att all times too.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

SnowflakeSmasher86 · 06/08/2026 08:32

No. i wouldn’t be ok with that.

A 2 year old, I’d either be holding their hand or at least be standing directly next to them so that if they fell over I could scoop them up before a wave washed over them.

HatAndScarf33 · 06/08/2026 08:32

The paddling in calm sea without a vest is ok, but they should be watched the whole time and parent should be closer imo. Things can happen so fast.

Oscillating · 06/08/2026 08:33

Imagine asking this
"I leave my 2 year old alone in the bath, and I sit in my bedroom and go in and check every few minutes".

Would that be reasonable? Of course not.

Dermatologically · 06/08/2026 08:33

No. They should be holding a parents hand or arms reach at that age. The life vest wouldn't make it any better if they weren't within arms reach either

waitinginwonderland · 06/08/2026 08:34

The paddling without a vest is fine but parent shouldn’t be out of arms reach.

Neolara · 06/08/2026 08:34

It's absolutely fine if you're standing over them or very close (1-2 meters away).and watching them continually. 15 meters away is nuts.

SilkRoads · 06/08/2026 08:35

15m is a long way.

Gardenisablooming · 06/08/2026 08:35

Given how many dc have drowned recently def not from me.
Some were in with an adult.
Still weren't safe.

TrunkElliot · 06/08/2026 08:35

Does ‘intermittently watching’ mean the parent is mostly on their phone?

Candleflakes · 06/08/2026 08:35

Absolutely not. That’s horrific parenting stupid.

LathkillDale · 06/08/2026 08:35

No!

TeenToTwenties · 06/08/2026 08:36

You should be close enough to scoop them up instantly.

Sparrowsandbudgies · 06/08/2026 08:36

Dermatologically · 06/08/2026 08:33

No. They should be holding a parents hand or arms reach at that age. The life vest wouldn't make it any better if they weren't within arms reach either

This.

EwwSprouts · 06/08/2026 08:38

No. Intermittently is bonkers. Needs to have hand held.

arethereanyleftatall · 06/08/2026 08:46

No. Arms reach.

JLou08 · 06/08/2026 09:27

Of course it's not. I'd guess you know that, surely no one would be daft enough to ask it here. Child's father or grandparents did it?

WineAndBridgerton3322 · 06/08/2026 09:40

WTF. NO, not ok. Parent should be there holding their hand. Anything further than half a metre is too far.

INeedaDietcoke · 06/08/2026 10:25

The red flag here is 'intermittently' watching. No matter how close or far you are a parent should be alert and continuously monitoring, not intermittently. I have let my kids play in very calm water (no waves, minimal current, water up to ankles) with no life vest and been more than a couple of metres away, but have had my eyes on them at all times, ready to react.

Iocanepowder · 06/08/2026 10:26

Fuck no. My 2 year old is tiny. I would be next to her at all times.

IkaBaar · 06/08/2026 10:27

Not Ok, at that age they should be within arms reach. No need for life vest if parent should be within arms reach.

mtobrokeme · 06/08/2026 10:29

No. I would say if you can’t be arsed to get up and play in the sea with your 2 year old then the person shouldn’t have had children.

CatsMcGoo · 06/08/2026 10:43

No.