Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

2y old paddling in sea - safety - opinions please

113 replies

Anoriginalusername2 · 06/08/2026 08:29

Opinions please. 2y old with no life vest paddling in very calm sea. Parent is 15m away, intermittently watching. Is this ok?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
CousinBette · 06/08/2026 14:03

Youcancallmeirrelevant · 06/08/2026 13:06

For a 2 year old of course this is fine! In the sea is different to in the bath

Are you mad?

mtobrokeme · 06/08/2026 14:04

Youcancallmeirrelevant · 06/08/2026 13:06

For a 2 year old of course this is fine! In the sea is different to in the bath

oh my god!

CocoPlum · 06/08/2026 14:06

Nope. I almost drowned at that age when I was paddling and went under.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

hourspassed · 06/08/2026 14:09

No. A 2 year old (and any child for that matter) should be supervised in water constantly.

The sea and waves can change quickly, even a calm one! A boat going past even miles out, will cause an extra level of waves coming in that you can be unprepared for. Be holding hands or at least close distance so you can grab them quickly.

Deepstone · 06/08/2026 14:18

I’d say the parent should be within arms reach really.

When DC3 was a similar age to that, we were on the beach paddling. Very calm sea, beach with a gradual slope / no shelves. The sea was about knee deep on DC3 when he tripped and fell face first into the sea.

He made no attempt at all to right himself and get his head out of the water. He just lay there motionless floating face down. Because I was right next to him, I was able to grab him and pull him up and out of the sea, and he was fine.
I don’t like to think about what might have happened if I’d been sitting 15m away watching intermittently, I don’t know whether DC3 would have started trying to get up himself once the surprise at falling had worn off, or whether he’d have stayed still and drowned, but it’s really not something I’d have liked to test.

WhatNoRaisins · 06/08/2026 14:19

In my experience 2 year olds are unpredictable as hell and honestly capable of anything so no, I'd want them in easy reach.

hopspot · 06/08/2026 14:22

No way. I wouldn’t insist on hand holding in calm ankle deep water but I would be fully alert and close enough (standing right next to them) to reach down and scoop them up if there was a sudden large wave or they tripped.

spiderlight · 06/08/2026 14:22

Nope - the bare minimum here is arm's reach and full attention at all times.

WonderingAboutThus · 06/08/2026 14:33

Not okay at all. For us a parent would always be in arms reach at that age, and of course, at any age, BEHIND the children in the sea, so that if a wave sweeps out, the wave pulls back both the child and the parent.

Youcancallmeirrelevant · 06/08/2026 14:43

sittingonabeach · 06/08/2026 13:59

2yo shouldn’t be left in a bath on their own. Guidance normally says youngest age you could leave them is 5

So my child has been in school for a year but I'm not allowed to leave them in a bath for 2 mins here and there while I'm upstairs as well? Honestly some of this 'guidance' is ridiculous

Mumsntfan1 · 06/08/2026 14:51

Youcancallmeirrelevant · 06/08/2026 13:06

For a 2 year old of course this is fine! In the sea is different to in the bath

Yes, it's more dangerous!

Mumsntfan1 · 06/08/2026 14:59

Youcancallmeirrelevant · 06/08/2026 14:43

So my child has been in school for a year but I'm not allowed to leave them in a bath for 2 mins here and there while I'm upstairs as well? Honestly some of this 'guidance' is ridiculous

Children don't tend to drown at school.

Seawolves · 06/08/2026 15:12

No. I wouldn't leave a 2 year old unattended in the bath either, drowning is rapid and silent.

canuckup · 06/08/2026 16:36

Parent needs to manage to get off their arse and actually be next to their child.

I'd bet my life this is a man. And I'd also bet he's also holding a cellphone

Luckyforsome23 · 06/08/2026 19:22

Touching or touching distance only in the sea at age 2. If I had their hand I could look away. If I wasn’t touching them my eyes would be glued to them and I would be max 2m away.

mumumental · 06/08/2026 20:14

Intermittent? Bonkers.

Oscillating · 06/08/2026 20:55

Totaldramallama · 06/08/2026 13:09

That's entirely different so what is the relevance?

What's different about not watching your child from 15 metres away on a beach a not watching your child in bath?

Neither are a good idea and is why children drown.

PolkaDotPorridge · 06/08/2026 20:56

Jesus , surely nobody is that STUPID?! 🤦🏼‍♀️

Oscillating · 06/08/2026 20:57

Youcancallmeirrelevant · 06/08/2026 14:43

So my child has been in school for a year but I'm not allowed to leave them in a bath for 2 mins here and there while I'm upstairs as well? Honestly some of this 'guidance' is ridiculous

If you think your child won't drown and die if submerged in water for the "2 minutes" you leave them unattended.... Then you're a fucking idiot.

Whatever is SO important that you would intentionally risk your child's life.and leave a 3 year old unattended?

And what has school got to do with drowning?.

Oscillating · 06/08/2026 21:02

Youcancallmeirrelevant · 06/08/2026 13:06

For a 2 year old of course this is fine! In the sea is different to in the bath

is sea water not real water? Do you think children can't drown in the sea?

You feel free to allow your 2 year old to be in the sea alone anf you be 15 metres away and occasionally look up... If you don't mind the consequence of watching your child's dead body float to shore or are happy to experience the absolute and complete panic when you look up from whatever is so interesting and can't see your toddler because he's under the water and dead.... Come back and tell us how its just fine to do that....

.... But I won't risk my child's life like that.

DelphiniumBlue · 06/08/2026 21:08

NO.
They could easily get knocked over by a wave.
Why wouldn't the adult responsible for them be standing right next to them? What could they be doing that's so important that they'd put a baby in danger?

backformoreofthesame · 06/08/2026 21:12

At that age - holding hands only

clary · 06/08/2026 21:32

No no way. 2yo I would say holding hands with parent. When a bit older, parent deeper into sea. I am a strong swimmer (DH is not) and when the DC were paddling and bodyboarding aged say 5+ I was always further out than they were (in my depth of course). Agree a life vest not needed tho and tbh not going to help. You need a parent.

Youcancallmeirrelevant · 06/08/2026 21:43

Oscillating · 06/08/2026 21:02

is sea water not real water? Do you think children can't drown in the sea?

You feel free to allow your 2 year old to be in the sea alone anf you be 15 metres away and occasionally look up... If you don't mind the consequence of watching your child's dead body float to shore or are happy to experience the absolute and complete panic when you look up from whatever is so interesting and can't see your toddler because he's under the water and dead.... Come back and tell us how its just fine to do that....

.... But I won't risk my child's life like that.

Edited

People are misreading what I've said, I wouldn't leave a 2 year old unattended in the sea! I was replying to the poster who said it's the same as leaving them unattended in a bath, which to me isn't the same, the sea is a lot more dangerous

Youcancallmeirrelevant · 06/08/2026 21:43

Mumsntfan1 · 06/08/2026 14:51

Yes, it's more dangerous!

In the sea yes I agree, people aren't reading the post I was commenting on!

Swipe left for the next trending thread