Is Jennifer Aniston entitled to throw pity parties for herself?

[emkana]

According to Suzanne Moore this Sunday she should just get over it, because she's rich, young and good-looking and there are no children involved.
Quote "Being dumped for Angelina Jolie cannot be nice and could surely happen to anyone. But, Jesus, Jennifer Aniston talks about herself as though she has a terminal illness."

I think that's a very cruel and superficial way of looking at it. If Jennifer Aniston took her marriage vows seriously, why should she be over it and "moving on" only seven (? I think) months after the split?

Commiserations R&B. Take the veil instead! Go the way of righteousness!!

Yeah, I'll have a think. Which school? One modern, one classic?

Oh, but it's not what us women think is attractive that matters in situations like this. And she might have a lovely personality!

Monkey POV.

Isn't she supposed to radiate an air of total bonkersness, which some men do find incredibly attractive?

Message withdrawn

Message withdrawn

He likes that though doesn't he? Juliette Whatshername, anyone? Now he's got bonkers and big lips. Any mans dream! An epicfanny! (c/o Caligula) Oh, thats quite apt, isn't it!

Haven't read all of this thread BUT....Brad wanted kids BUT also admited that he didn't believe in fidelity. What would you do in JA's shoes???

And then along comes the Black Widow. (Sorry to any fans but I am not a fan of Ms Jolie).

JA is entitled to throw as many pity parties as she likes - however I reckon that comment was taken out of context. SHe is doing well BUT with down days. Normal I would have thought!