Is Jennifer Aniston entitled to throw pity parties for herself?

[emkana]

According to Suzanne Moore this Sunday she should just get over it, because she's rich, young and good-looking and there are no children involved.
Quote "Being dumped for Angelina Jolie cannot be nice and could surely happen to anyone. But, Jesus, Jennifer Aniston talks about herself as though she has a terminal illness."

I think that's a very cruel and superficial way of looking at it. If Jennifer Aniston took her marriage vows seriously, why should she be over it and "moving on" only seven (? I think) months after the split?

She used to be an extremely good looking woman and when she wrote for the Guardian, she was one of the columnists I always read. Don't know what's happened to her at the Daily Mail, because I never read it. What days does she have her column there?

Message withdrawn

Ha! (no I don't ..Stop it Monkey!)

Cod, she doesn't look like a medium...more a large

hunker

Message withdrawn

Same could be said of la Burchill Caligula. But she was never attractive was she? Only to Tony Parsons, and he doesnt count.

Burchill was goodlooking in NME days. But she still had That Voice.

Oh Burchill was beautiful. If you see photos of her when she was young, she was really stunning.

Thus goes the way of all flesh....

Message withdrawn

Did someone take my name in vain?

Tony Parsons, however, has always looked like that. Poor love.

Ahh, Snafu, were you a fan in then days??

Oh frigg!

Urgh, worked for NME for about 5 mins. Bunch of idiots.

Message withdrawn

You cow!

She wasn't bad looking when she stripped for a living though!

Message withdrawn

I'll get you, hunker, you just see if I don't

She shoots...she scores!

Back of the net.

Etc

Message withdrawn

Well below!

Hunker, I feel I have passed the MN initiation! Thankyou

LOL!