Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Shannon Matthews Mother arrested !!!!!

1002 replies

kay1981 · 07/04/2008 09:22

They have arrested her on perverting the course of justice - which i think means lying to the police under oath doesnt it?

Is it at all possible that they knew where she was all the time?

Perhaps cahnnel 4 should now re-show the documentary on shannons family and see how it is received knowing what we know.

OP posts:
Piffle · 10/04/2008 20:41

well Edam that's you told

There are some really hideous aspects to this thread.
Evil
I'm not sure I would classify anyone in this particular incident evil in judicial sense of the word.

Just stand back and think about the bloody kids and their upside down turned lives.
Have a shred of decency and instead of dining out on salacious tabloid header "facts" think about the human cost to that family and the people involved. Does Karen look evil FGS, no she looks like a rabbit about to be squashed dead in oncoming headlights. Yes she may be guilty of a crime indeed she may but that does not make her less human in feelings, she has lost all her kids and her boyfriend (however desirable he may not be to us, she obviously cared for him)

A feel so much more pity than hatred. For someone to think something like this could make things better for them? How shit must their starting point have been huh?

Trolleydolly71 · 10/04/2008 20:44

Message withdrawn

Monkeytrousers · 10/04/2008 20:46

was always something fishy here

policywonk · 10/04/2008 20:48

Trolley, it's a question of degree. If someone I knew was accused of child rape, I wouldn't let them babysit my child; nor would I stand in a public place proclaiming their guilt as though it were an established fact.

Furthermore, you and Cote and chocfest have little on which to base your fevered proclamations of disgust, other than reports in the shittiest tabloids, unsubstatiated rumour of the type kindly provided by ruddynorah, and frothing-at-the-mouth phone-in participants. Frankly, you know very fucking little about the 'truth' of the matter. What riles me is that you all consistently post as though you do.

Monkeytrousers · 10/04/2008 20:49

JMTPW

There has to be some sus of guilt to be charged and this suspecion (never been aboe to remember how to spell that) will be there until proven guilty...

Monkeytrousers · 10/04/2008 20:51

and that mum alwasy gave me the hebbie jeebies

very much screamed 'toxic' at me - for purely personal and sunjective reasons

Trolleydolly71 · 10/04/2008 20:51

Message withdrawn

Bubble99 · 10/04/2008 20:52

Are a child's wishes taking into account if the child wants to stay in foster care rather than return to his/her family?

Piffle · 10/04/2008 20:56

evil crime then
the yorkshire ripper was evil
so were Brady and Hindly
The Wests...
All declared so by a judge
You lumping Karen in with those illustrious murderous criminal predecesors?

Trolleydolly71 · 10/04/2008 20:58

Message withdrawn

Trolleydolly71 · 10/04/2008 21:00

Message withdrawn

kiskideesameanoldmother · 10/04/2008 21:00

this thread had no promise of redemption from the get go.

lay off.

Karen will be vilified forever even if what she has actually done turns out to be relatively minor in the eyes of the law.

the poor woman will need a new identity.

the attitudes of some on this thread is testament to that.

please let this thread die soon and no resurrection under another name.

policywonk · 10/04/2008 21:01

You can comment all you like. But if you comment on here you can expect other people to disagree with you quite strongly.

And, again, stating quite baldly that SM is guilty is not 'comment'.

shrinkingsagpuss · 10/04/2008 21:03

You say what she has done is evil - so please, tell us, WHAT has she done? Are you in some amazing position to hold all the facts about this case? Bloody hell, who needs police and a justice system? just read some of the posters on this thread, who clearly have a form of second sight, or something. We know what she has BEEN charged with - but not the detail of exactly what they claim she has done.

The child was not harmed. in any way apparently. Certainly no more than her apparently dubious upbringing had already harmed her. Did she even know she had been "kidnapped" ?

Not evil. Stupid stupid thoughtless brainless, daft, stupid. but not evil.

And as for letting an alleged paedophile near children. that it what the bail system is for. It assesses risk, to the accused and to the public, it assesses flight risk, livng circumstances.

Ever heard of men accused of rape? ever heard of men falsely accused of rape? Uh huh?

put the pitchforks down.

Monkeytrousers · 10/04/2008 21:24

hardly a good analogy

Trolleydolly71 · 10/04/2008 21:24

Message withdrawn

Monkeytrousers · 10/04/2008 21:28

Well you are entitled to your opinionj Trolly - there is more information about her bad parenting skills available (from a huge amount of sources) than any other.

Shannon and the kids are the real innocents here. The mother made a grave misjudgement that she is lucky to emerge from like this but is guilty of huge irresponsioblty and neglect.

figroll · 10/04/2008 21:34

"the poor woman will need a new identity."

Might I suggest that it would be Shannon Matthews who will need a new identity, not the person who arranged her notoriety.

May2December · 10/04/2008 21:36

What Shannon (and the other children involved) needs now are the facts and for the trial to go ahead. What they do not need is for this crazy witchhunt against their mother from outsiders. To be honest I think you are making things worse for Shannon and the other children and in view of charges being made should leave it alone and wait for the trial.

chocfest · 11/04/2008 07:55

Eh? We don't know Shannon or her excuse for a mother.

This is a mums forum to discuss and put forward our views and debate issues.

It has never been a jury, it is not a court room, and if that is the case then most of the threads and topics within mumset need to be removed.

Unfortunately within a forum you are going to get people who disagree. Its a fact of life.

In this case I for one have disagreed with quite a few others, I didnt come onto this thread to make KM into mother of the year because it would have been 'nice' or pc to do so.

Nope, I have said it how I see it, gasp, shock, horror and will stand by that fact right the waqy through to the conviction.

milliec · 11/04/2008 08:22

Message withdrawn

kiskideesameanoldmother · 11/04/2008 09:02

chocfest, you obviously have a lot of brain neurons but they are not all firing when they are supposed to.

a discussion like this just whips up hate and vigilantism.

of course she is not the mother of the year.

of course we will have strong feelings, mostly negative, from the pieces of the puzzle we have been allowed to see.

of course we are free to hold a discussion.

what many have done is come up with speculation based on nothing more than I know.

some of you are behaving a bunch of vultures already pecking at a not yet dead animal. I would be ashamed to know some of you in real life.

bunch of halfthinking fishwives.

as my mum would say, this story has grown a head and a tail and run off on its own.

shut up, grow up and go do something productive!

Monkeytrousers · 11/04/2008 09:24

Bet you hoped that was the 1000th post eh Milli?

Monkeytrousers · 11/04/2008 09:26

Oh I do wish people would stop trying to stop debate on this site. Gossip is a fact of life fgs. For better or worse. We are social beings and we learn by these things

edam · 11/04/2008 09:52

Cote - 'can you that for you love' was a quote from Claire Rayner. That's what 'copyright Claire Rayner' meant. Maybe you haven't come across the concept before?

You don't actually have any facts to back up your repeated assertion that KM is on benefits. You know perfectly well you don't have any factual basis for this belief, otherwise you would have mentioned any inside info by now. All you or any of us know is that her partner has a job so the benefits thing is unlikely, to put it mildly.

If you do have evidence, why not share it with everyone, rather than just repeating an unjustified assertion.

There is enough shit to throw at the woman without inventing anything.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread