I despise the man and everything he stands for, in fact I had stated long before he was convicted that he was well known to be a vile unpleasant creep in the town where my ILs lived and was shouted down at the time. But I am dubious about the authenticity of this letter. Not that I don't think that he wouldn't have the capacity to voice such thoughts, but something about the fact that it's been written from prison, in a smug manner, sent to a friend who has then passed it to the daily mail just doesn't seem right.
If the friend was that appalled why did they not go to the police? the prison authorities? It would then have been easier to have RH stopped from writing this kind of stuff while in prison. Why go to the Daily Mail?
I can't help wondering whether this 'friend' wants to continue the victim blaming by having this letter published. Because the victims would read it and see the words, not the shock on its release iyswim.
It should never have been published IMO and if the friend was that appalled they wouldn't have remained anonymous - if someone I knew wrote that kind of crap to me I would want to personally distance myself. I'm not sure the friend is as appalled as they claim to be, and reckon they share rh's agenda.