Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Did you hear about that woman who had a three month premture baby,but still went ahead with her wedding on the very same day??????

38 replies

FrankButcher · 28/09/2006 12:35

She must have been a major league Bridezilla!!

OP posts:
bluejelly · 28/09/2006 12:35
Shock
littleducks · 28/09/2006 12:38

she really wanted married name on birth cert?

FrankButcher · 28/09/2006 12:42

Here

OP posts:
CountessDracula · 28/09/2006 12:43

frank are you moondog?

hulababy · 28/09/2006 12:44

Link

desperateSCOUSEwife · 28/09/2006 12:45

why cd does moondog is heffer

hulababy · 28/09/2006 12:46

She even had the recption. At least the have cancelled the honeymoon!!!

I gather it was an easy birth, but even so, wasn't she worried about the baby being born so early? And to leave the baby just 4 hours after birth - I couldn't have done it.

FrankButcher · 28/09/2006 12:47

Yes Guv.
Why has my ability to do links vanished with old moniker??

OP posts:
JackRegan · 28/09/2006 13:15

because you are now a bumbling cockney twat?

DumbledoresGirl · 28/09/2006 13:19

Why has Moondog disappeared? Don't like this FrankButcher chap.

Moondog · 28/09/2006 13:32

Temporary silliness DG (or rather LM)
How's your mum????

DumbledoresGirl · 28/09/2006 14:07

Going to see her this weekend, so I can give you a better idea next week. Last I heard, she was getting some memory back and talking less gibberish

controlfreaky2 · 28/09/2006 14:22

agreed dg. frank butcher is not good name.

morningpaper · 28/09/2006 14:26

"Mrs Agar, who is now back in St Michael's hospital"

no surprise there!

divastrop · 28/09/2006 21:07

obviously losing the money they'd spent on the wedding would have been more unbearable than leaving their premature son!

marthamoo · 28/09/2006 21:14

I couldn't have left my baby so soon after giving birth - I know with preemies you do have to go home sometimes, as they can be in for months - but not four hours later...And in the newspaper (the Torygraph, so it must be true - have been buying it for the Roald Dahl tokens) it said she stayed at the reception til 10pm No, I couldn't have done it.

DumbledoresGirl · 28/09/2006 21:15

Oh don't be too hard on her; she didn't go on the honeymoon.

Blondilocks · 28/09/2006 21:18

Some people react to things by blanking them out. Perhaps carrying on as normal with her day was their way of coping with it all.

colditz · 28/09/2006 21:22

Perhaps she was in psychological shock?

Perhaps she is a selfish bitch?

We will probably never know.

Nemo1977 · 28/09/2006 21:26

I just couldnt have done that..especially so prem what would she have done if something had happened to the baby.

Blondilocks · 28/09/2006 21:27

Give the poor woman a break. Does it really matter? I hardly saw anything of my LO the first day of her life & I was in the hospital!

Frizbe · 28/09/2006 21:29

I couldn't have done it

beansprout · 28/09/2006 21:30

My god, wild horses wouldn't have dragged me from ds when he was born and he was late 'n' sturdy.

To be fair though, perhaps she was just in some sort of shock/denial.... or something. Most odd though.

hulababy · 28/09/2006 21:32

The baby was less than 2lbs - must surely have needed to be in SCBU. Why didn't she (and her husband) just want to be with him? Is a wedding really more important? And it wasn't just the wedding - she left to get to an 11am hair appintment, some 5 hours before the wedding, then went on to the reception afterwards!

If my baby had been born 3 months early, so tiny and frail, there is no way I would willing go out and be away from the child!

Hmmm,,,no doubt selling her story afterwards might have helped

hulababy · 28/09/2006 21:35

I hope it was shock/denial...but...would she then go on to sell her story and have it plastered all over the media? Once the shock had worn off, would she not then feel a bit bad about it rather than wanting the world to know?