Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
News
Original poster

Angelina 4 months gone? And all hail the Jolie Pitt name change.

43 replies

Piffle · 20/01/2006 10:53

Hmmmm
I know she is slim but even so, reckon maybe a little more than 4 mths...
I am bored today can you tell...
My Heat ban is killing me

zahara and maddox name change and photo of pregnant La Jolie Pitt

OP posts:
Enid · 20/01/2006 10:55

i would say five ish months

but she is soooo slim it would show earlier

Nbg · 20/01/2006 10:59

God

I look like that now at 10 weeks!

I find them 2 quite weird.

Albert · 20/01/2006 10:59

Ooo yes, I see what you mean. I think the child will be quite beautiful don't you? Are they actually married? I'm so out of touch since moving, I can't get any English junk gossip mags here at all and really miss not knowing what the celebs are up to - any good websites for this? Why do you have a Heat ban?

GhostofChristmasNatt · 20/01/2006 11:03

if you superslim and toned would show later, no? reckon 5 + mopnths on that basis, especially as first babay. needless to say i looked like that at 5 weeks....

Lacrimosa · 20/01/2006 11:06

MTV yesterday announced them as Bradjelina Pitts!

VeniVidiVickiQV · 20/01/2006 11:15

I looked a bit like that at 14 weeks

Mind you im about 3 times her size

VeniVidiVickiQV · 20/01/2006 11:15

Sorry, that should be 18 weeks. double

Flamesparrow · 20/01/2006 11:16

I'd say 5ish months too... she is way too toned and muscular to show very early with her first child...

shellybelly · 20/01/2006 12:36

sorry to jump in apparently news is saying she is expecting twins as she has had fertility treatment

kama · 20/01/2006 12:50

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Seashells · 20/01/2006 12:52

I heard it was twins too, due to fertility treament... they wernt together long before deciding to go for that!

Lakota · 20/01/2006 12:59

But the child could get all the worst bits - a baby with a square head, low brow and disproportionally large mouth and long bony fingers could be the result! Bet Jennifer hopes so...

Original poster
Piffle · 20/01/2006 13:03

twins ffs
fertility treatment
if she came onto mn and said I@ve met a man, he is married, he has left her, we are having fertility treatment and I have 2 kids already
We'd section her surely...
mental hospital not caesarean btw
I was that slim with my ds and very triathlete fit. I was still in my jeans at 6 mths. Did not look like that until 8 mths and then it all went BooooF!

OP posts:
Aloha · 20/01/2006 13:26

Why fertility treatment I wonder. Either Ms Jolie was adopting children despite being married because she wasn't able to concieve with husbands no1 & 2 (!) or Mr Pitt's little swimmers aren't all they could be, hence no babies with Jennifer and her fury at his allegations that it was her fault they didn't have kids...

munz · 20/01/2006 13:30

def more than 4 months, i'm PG with my first (started off slightly plump) but my bump was that big around 5 months ish - bit like katie holmes really her bump was big for 3 month.

pumpkin7 · 20/01/2006 13:59

I have to agree with nbg, they do seem a bit weird. I used to like Brad but he went down in my books the minute he cheated and now to announce he is going to be a dad 5 minutes after leaving his wife is a bit out of order. I feel so sorry for jennifer

I agree that the baby will be beautiful but I think the whole baby thing has happened too soon.

Twiglett · 20/01/2006 14:04

ha ..

the child will look like them BEFORE the plastic surgery

who knows what it will look like

Original poster
Piffle · 20/01/2006 14:09

Pls tell me shes not natural, that would knock her off dp's
"Who I'd f**k if I got the chance list"
then they'd be no one on it
Actually...
except me me me
probably more chance with La Jolie hee hee

OP posts:
mummytosteven · 20/01/2006 14:16

My bump was that size at 6/7 months! Maybe twins, or maybe just a very lot of amniotic fluid?

HappyMumof2 · 20/01/2006 15:42

Message withdrawn

Flamesparrow · 20/01/2006 15:45

Too soon That poor woman - not only does he leave you for another woman, but within hardly any time he has adopted her children, and had fertility treatment with her.

Kidstrack2 · 20/01/2006 15:45

I was also thinking twins a few weeks ago when the story broke, now its been reported in the papers, you tend to show quicker with second babies, and as this is her first I would of thought she could of hid it till nearly 5-6months.

pumpkin7 · 20/01/2006 16:38

Maybe I am in a cynical mood today but judging by their past relationships I will be shocked if they are still together in 5yrs time. When the reality of looking after 3 children under the age of 2 plus a 5yr old (and trying to hold down an acting career) hits them I think they will find the pressure too much and part. I hope im wrong for the kids' sake.

fuzzywuzzy · 20/01/2006 16:46

Will they feel the pressure of taking care of so many young children...surely that's the nannies' jobs???

Nickinha · 20/01/2006 16:52

If she really is four or more months on, that would mean she fell pregnant while he was still married

Swipe left for the next trending thread