Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Angelina 4 months gone? And all hail the Jolie Pitt name change.

43 replies

Piffle · 20/01/2006 10:53

Hmmmm
I know she is slim but even so, reckon maybe a little more than 4 mths...
I am bored today can you tell...
My Heat ban is killing me

zahara and maddox name change and photo of pregnant La Jolie Pitt

OP posts:
HappyMumof2 · 20/01/2006 16:53

Message withdrawn

pumpkin7 · 20/01/2006 17:06

I cant beleive Brad didnt break the news to Jennifer before it leaked. As if he hadnt hurt her enough but then to hear he's going to be a dad from reading a paper is disgusting, and for him to say he had told her and she was fine with it just proves what an arse he really is.

ruty · 20/01/2006 17:11

they are never going to feel the strain of bringing up children - they'll have an army of top nannies.

ruty · 20/01/2006 17:11

but the strain of coping with each other's egos - that might be a different matter!

WideWebWitch · 20/01/2006 17:12

five or six months surely on that body?

pumpkin7 · 20/01/2006 17:20

You are probably right ruty, on both points.

Dont you just hate it though that these so called stars think they are too posh to actually look after their children. First they are too posh to push and then cant handle the stress of having a new baby to look after and get strangers in to do it for them. Its different for people when they have to work but stars dont even look after their kids when they are at home.

kama · 20/01/2006 17:58

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Piffle · 20/01/2006 18:12

I'm loathe to condemn them as who knows what his marriage to JA was really like.
She could be psycho woman for all we know
But it does seem abnormally... hasty...
marry in haste repent at leisure

OP posts:
ruty · 20/01/2006 18:16

er, it would be impossible to live the life she leads without childcare of some kind. Maybe she has a very understanding mother?

Seashells · 20/01/2006 18:19

What I don't get though, he only got divorced in Oct, so were they already getting fertility treament then? Seems so hasty! Perhaps the twins aren't even Brad's, maybe she was going it alone till he turned up to play daddy?

Aloha · 20/01/2006 19:47

surely the very fact that they got fertility treatment so early shows that at least one of them knew that they might have trouble getting pregnant...so who is it? Angelina Jolie who was adopting children alone while still married? Or Brad Pitt, who put it about that the reason his marriage failed is because his wife didn't want children...?

HappyMumof2 · 20/01/2006 19:49

Message withdrawn

busybusybee · 20/01/2006 19:52

A picture from another thread started by daisy1999 (I think!)

Ahem! weird arms

Piffle · 20/01/2006 19:53

Maybe JA did not want to undergo fertility treatment if there was a problem
Lets speculate
After watching Sky do this about the whale all afternoon I'm raging...
It seems really grrr as just before the Jen brad split, like 1 day before it was announced there was a lovely pic of them cuddled, sad but obviously close. I thought it would be nice kind break up...
I do think he's a smarmy shit though
I've never liked him much...

OP posts:
HappyMumof2 · 20/01/2006 20:09

Message withdrawn

HappyMumof2 · 20/01/2006 20:09

Message withdrawn

PeachyClair · 20/01/2006 20:37

Don't reckn they could fit both egos in the same house. It was way too quick for Jennifer's sake BUT the marry in hast thing somebody said?

Met DH in September at new job, ditched Fiance start december (had good reasons, mind you, and better before wedding), started with DH two weeks alter, moved in together Jan 16th (exaccerbated by me leaving fiance and MIL-to-be hating me visiting Dh there), engaged valentines day, Sam conceived March 11th (DH's birthday ), Sam born Dec 3rd, wedding March 11th.

We've been together over seven years now, OK nothing's guaranteed but I am happy, and it's been all worth it. Three kids now, BTW.

nulnulcat · 20/01/2006 21:19

she could be huge early on i had a noticeable bump at 10 weeks and was desperately trying to keep whole thing secret at work but was getting asked when due, im only a size 8 so think the slimmer you are the more you show

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread